Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or Democrat: The Game

hogjack said:
Maybe the Newtster is banging the current US Secretary of State, too?

The White House swing rooms are busy!


No, he's on the radio in Atlanta today...

Can't we just Moveon?
 
Joaquin1975 said:
Ahh, yes. Remember it is for peaceful purposes. In the meantime, Syria and Israel remain mum on the details, and speculation ensues. I do not have an answer as to say if it is all true or not, but it is a Zionist conspiracy nonetheless.

As for Democrats, Hillary said she backs the strike by Israel, in a hypothetical sense of course.

My head hurts.

Yes, but she refused, refused to say she would strike Iran's facilities, instead she wants direct talks (because Bush refuses to do that). But when Obama said he would engage in direct talks, she took him to task for being naive...

I honestly don't think she remembers what she says from audience to audience.

Alzheimer's?
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

According to his website Ronald Reagan is one of his political heroes.

Maybe "Mahmoud" is Persion for The Gipper?
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
They ration lesbians?

Isn't Lesbos traditionally a part of the Persian Empire...

:D
Heh. I meant ratio. Although . . . the rationing of Lesbians is a good idea. I'll take two please.
 
Paendragon said:
Heh. I meant ratio. Although . . . the rationing of Lesbians is a good idea. I'll take two please.


:D :D :D

I know, and you took it like a man.

You can have Pookie and kbate.

I have to go...
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
That's too easy. Democrat...


;) ;)

The truth hurts doesn't it?

Otherwise, you wouldn't resort to an ad hominem attack, would you? :D
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
Yes, but she refused, refused to say she would strike Iran's facilities, instead she wants direct talks (because Bush refuses to do that). But when Obama said he would engage in direct talks, she took him to task for being naive...

I honestly don't think she remembers what she says from audience to audience.

Alzheimer's?

It's hard to say. I have only been keeping up with the six-party talk process, and the Syria/DPRK connection is vague. Now how does that have anything to do with Iran? There were reports Kim Yong Nam went to have a nice talk in Iran and Syria went to Pyongyang.

It could all be a coincidence. I do not know.

Again, as for the Democratic/Ahmadinejad connection, I am not well-versed enough to play the game.
 
If I cared to, I could dig up antiwar quotes from Republicans at the time of Kosovo, and embarrass the wingnuts who have been trying to sell us on the idea that opposition to war is always unpatriotic. But I don't care to.

GiannaF, the so-called libertarians here outnumber the genuine variety, but I see you're already discovering that.
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
:D :D :D

I know, and you took it like a man.

You can have Pookie and kbate.

I have to go...
Pookie and kbate . . . nice.

(Porn has taught me that all lesbians really want to have sex with men as part of a threesome. Porn wouldn't lie, would it?)
 
So, nobody watched the debate.

This is why Hillary feels free to say she would engage in direct talks with Iran after telling Obama that would be a very naive thing to do. She knows you're going to vote for her no matter what she does or says. She knows you want Bill back.

Republican anti-war quotes from Kosavo? Probably fewer than current Demcorats who voted for the war before being against it as the polls went, but certainly zero quotes on how we were defeated as we have from Murtha, Reid, Pelosi, Durbin, Rangel...

Even Osama hasn't gone there!
 
Back
Top