KimGordon67
Rampant feminist
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2014
- Posts
- 8,395
I think that this is an amazing statement! The end comes down to everyone doing what they feel is right for them and their children. I don’t judge anyone for the decisions that they make to stay or go (my parents were divorced and for the most part I turned out pretty good - okay no comments on that statement from any of you). The problem I see with this discussion is people often offhandedly judge ME for staying in a marriage that I’m not super happy in (or that is even really a marriage at all these days but more of a coparenting roommate situation). The remark “you deserve to be happy too” is one I’ve heard sooo many times. And it’s not that I think myself a martyr...I’m just not unhappy enough to change things so drastically in my kids lives. Is it the right decision? Who knows? Will my kids one day blame my staying in a marriage that wasn’t fulfilling on some failing of their own? Probably. But they’d blame me divorcing on it too...
My point is, judging people for the decisions they make with all of the knowledge they have is never okay. We each need to do what we can to survive and hope that in the end we send smart and semi well adjusted kids out into the world to make their own mistakes and learn from them.
Pretty much this is my whole thought process as well...and until something changes? I always have my little naughty corner of the Internet here at LIT![]()
I think part of the problem is that we end to assess the situations of others through our own 'lens' (for want of a better word), and based on our own experiences, and often on our own moral parameters. For me, getting married was never likely to be a 'forever' thing, and we were aware of that going in - nothing we said to each other when we got married implied 'forever'. Some people might say that suggested a lack of commitment ... but by the time we got married, we'd already had a kid and bought a house together, which for me were much larger indicators of committing to something. And I can quite categorically say I'll love my (now ex) husband 'for ever' ... but the 'type' of love has changed.
Also, I guess when we decided we didn't want to be together any more, we were, and still are, very committed to continuing to be a family. We still spend birthdays and Christmas together, and we all spend time together at other points as well - I stayed at my ex's house for a couple of nights just the other week because we were going to see a band together. When my ex is having arguments with our kid, he'll often call me and put me on speaker phone so I can contribute to whatever argument they're having.
We never really thought about the fact that we were distinguishing between us as a couple - which finished - and all of us a family - which is still very strong. But maybe if people were able to do that a bit more, it would be easier for some people? Possibly it's helped here by the legal situation - when couples separate here, the only ongoing financial responsibility is for the child. We don't have alimony. And, as I discovered (sort of to my surprise), you can do everything without getting lawyers involved. We just divided up the money and the stuff, we considered the wellbeing of each other as well as ourselves, I pay an amount of child support that we both agreed was reasonable, and we revisit the financial situation ever now and then to make sure it's still equitable.
So I don't think us breaking up suggested a 'lack of commitment' either - it was a full year between making the decision and the final act of selling the house, and that length of time was mostly about making sure we started our separate households the best we could. There was actually a huge level of commitment to making sure each of us was OK (financially and otherwise) and that we were setting up a post-separation situation that would work well for our child - basically, we just put his happiness and wellbeing at the centre of everything, and all the decisions we made flowed from that.