Milo Yiannopoulos flames out

[yukonnights]

As I mentioned on another thread, the first time I heard of this guy was on the Rogan podcast in question. (I was a frequent listener at that time.) In the section in question, he was bragging about being fucked and sucked by adults when he was 13, and about being gangbanged when he 15 or so. I thought, "This dude was raped" when I heard it, and Rogan did too because he said, "This sounds like abusive molestation" (or something around those lines). Milo then explained why he wasn't a victim, that it's normal for older gay men to do this sort of thing. Those are the "pedo comments" which took him down. It's a cheap take down and untrue if you heard the whole thing, as he was clearly justifying his own abuse.

But since the has spent the last year or two touring the country as a semi-professional troll this is to be expected. And this is a step towards getting Bannon... ultimately leading to Trump.

It isn't a coincidence that WaPo published this article seemingly hours before the Milo take down. Note the article leads with Milo... why? It's pretty obvious this was orchestrated.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/bannon-molded-breitbart-into-a-far-right-sledgehammer-how-it-will-be-wielded-in-the-trump-era/2017/02/19/422fbed2-f704-11e6-be05-1a3817ac21a5_story.html?utm_term=.c4fc302e819d

The thing overlooked is that he believes pedophilia is normal and he made that clear in his comments. That's fine if he wants to believe that, but people who place themselves in a position to have a national voice of influence do not get to hold such ideas...at least not yet, thankfully.

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

The thing overlooked is that he believes pedophilia is normal and he made that clear in his comments. That's fine if he wants to believe that, but people who place themselves in a position to have a national voice of influence do not get to hold such ideas...at least not yet, thankfully.

That was not overlooked. That's the whole news cycle. Were you not paying attention? The "he is pro pedophilia" IS the story, how are you claiming it's been overlooked?

(Though technically he wasn't talking about pedophilia. He was talking about hebephilia and ephebophilia.)

 

[phrodeau]

https://www.facebook.com/myiannopoulos/posts/851263248344905

Oh, I guess his words were misunderstood. It's a shame he can't earn a living as a journalist anymore.

 

[BotanyBoy]

It's a shame he can't earn a living as a journalist anymore.

LOL, how in the fuck do you figure?

 

[neci]

Resigns from Breitbart



http://money.cnn.com/2017/02/21/media/milo-yiannopoulos-downfall/index.html


Can he blow this off and suck it up?

he can, if he can get away with a tell all of his personal coming of age story. the next lolita?

 

[neci]

*r**t*art the will eat it up, because it will reinforce the ultra conservative position on homosexuals and their portrayed threat to children. one step closer to putin's america. send him off to finishing school and marry the fucker off. that or chop of his cock for the good of society. i would leave the balls. i wonder if they'd wither.

 

[Hard_Rom]

The quotes I read from him describe him being a bit older. Old enough for age of consent in the UK but not for the US. But he discussed having a 29 year old lover. Gay or straight, UK or US, 29 is way to old to be banging those still in teens. That is just gross and sad.

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

*r**t*art the will eat it up, because it will reinforce the ultra conservative position on homosexuals and their portrayed threat to children. one step closer to putin's america. send him off to finishing school and marry the fucker off. that or chop of his cock for the good of society. i would leave the balls. i wonder if they'd wither.

I like the way you think.

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

The quotes I read from him describe him being a bit older. Old enough for age of consent in the UK but not for the US. But he discussed having a 29 year old lover. Gay or straight, UK or US, 29 is way to old to be banging those still in teens. That is just gross and sad.

I heard the actual show being referenced. He was 13. It was pretty disgusting to tell you the truth. He sounds like a drug addict. Poor judgment.

 

[Disgustipated]

He reminds of eeyore.

 

[irksomesauce]

He reminds of eeyore.

...slobbered the quivering Catholic priest from his knees.

 

[Disgustipated]

...slobbered the quivering Catholic priest from his knees.

Stop it. I'm about 32 years too old for you.

 

[KingOrfeo]

No he was simply speaking of the typical gay male lifestyle. Older men fucking younger ones, "teaching" them the ropes.

Well, maybe so, but how often does "younger" mean 13?!

 

[renard_ruse]

Fake news article. Did anyone by chance listen to his actual press conference? Suggest doing so rather than believing the MSM's distortion of what happened.

First off he said explicitly he was voluntarily leaving Brietbart so as not to distract from their message. Secondly, he appologized for choice of words that could be misinterpreted. He was referrring to a relationship he had as an of age (in Britain) 17 year old with a 29 year old man.

Thirdly, he made very clear, he is not going away. On the contrary he has already lined up a new publisher for his book, and has another campus speaking tour planned, although he said he would go after "both left and right" in the future.

Although I wasn't sure what to make of the him, if you dig into this some more, you see that the professional "conservatives" at CPAC (do nothing full time "conservatives" who make a living off being "conservative") appear to not like his homosexuality, it made many of them "uncomfortable." There are always videos of this or that that are out there somewhere that can be trotted out to get rid of someone as needed, which appears to be the case here.

None of this in any way justifies the efforts to censor him, or the behavior of the intolerant PC thugs at Berkeley or the growing climate of tyranny and censorship from the left and the establishment today.

 

[renard_ruse]

The quotes I read from him describe him being a bit older. Old enough for age of consent in the UK but not for the US. But he discussed having a 29 year old lover. Gay or straight, UK or US, 29 is way to old to be banging those still in teens. That is just gross and sad.

No, its not. If people are of legal age and like each other, its none of your concern.

 

[renard_ruse]

The thing overlooked is that he believes pedophilia is normal and he made that clear in his comments. ..

He made no such thing "clear" in his comments, listen to his actual press conference.

 

[phrodeau]

LOL, how in the fuck do you figure?

Because he can't do words right.

 

[phrodeau]

Milo wasn't Swiftboated, and he wasn't O'Keefed. The videos are all him, unedited.

 

[JawnKarTurr]

Now liberals care about the age of consent? Lena Dunham comes to mind, but then so does that creep the Salon felt the need to give a forum too.

 

[Not Normal]

Apparently even Breitbart has its limits.

Who'd a thunk it?

 

[BotanyBoy]

Because he can't do words right.

Hasn't stopped him yet.

Now liberals care about the age of consent? Lena Dunham comes to mind, but then so does that creep the Salon felt the need to give a forum too.

Anything goes as long as you're for the cause!!!

 

[Hard_Rom]

No he was simply speaking of the typical gay male lifestyle. Older men fucking younger ones, "teaching" them the ropes. George Michael sang about this.

Gay men have no more predilection to fucking young things than straight males do. May not be saying much for either orientation though.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

I've never paid him any mind and never discussed him.

...

Like many corrupted by liberalism, Milo Yiannopoulos has been ill served by the liberty he enjoys, because it seems that most of what he "pleases to do" is vile and vulgar (and, with the loss of his job at Breitbart, his book deal, and his CPAC invite, has recently cost him dearly.)

I've never been impressed with Yiannopoulos. His penchant for what is vulgar has always turned me off. As is the case with a foul-mouthed musician or comedian, if you have to resort to regular use of cursing and crude sexual references to make your point, I'm just not going to pay attention. In light of that, I've never understood the fascination of some conservatives ("so-called" in many cases, I'm afraid) with a swearing, sex-crazed, unrepentant homosexual.

Yes, Yiannopoulos has boldly taken a stand for free speech and bravely confronted the ignorant, safe space-seeking "End of Discussion" mob that dominates U.S. campuses. However, he's done so devoid of "morality and religion" and with few "civil and social manners." Thus, as Matt Walsh recently pointed out:

[Yiannopoulos] is not equipped nor qualified to be a spokesman for the conservative cause. He never was. He was always a spokesman for his own cause, his own cult, and even before his foray into pederasty-promoting, his cult never had very much to do with anything resembling conservatism.​

...

Trevor Thomas





http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/02/milo_needs_moral_chains.html#ixzz4ZPc9HJAr

 

[Lancecastor]

Laurel owns Simon & Schuster and Brietbart?

Nice!

 

[Conager]

Milo wasn't Swiftboated, and he wasn't O'Keefed. The videos are all him, unedited.

So, you acknowledge the validity of the O'Keefe videos? That's uncharacteristically candid of you.