My two Sterling threads.

Ishmael

Literotica Guru
Joined
Nov 24, 2001
Posts
84,005
Yup, my first and my last.

Arguing over the legality of how the tape was obtained is pointless, it's out there and it's not going away.

Sterling was a known bigot for 30 some years. He was allowed to buy indulgences from various and sundry organizations, including the NAACP. So why does this set up, and that's what it is, appear now? Who did he fail to pay off? Who wants the team?

re. The fine. Peanuts, who cares?

re. The suspension. Symbolism over substance. He's the owner, he makes the decision as to when the check is written, to who, and for how much. Does the NBA really think they can appoint some third party to have unfettered access to Sterling's checking account?

re. The forced sale based on a vote of owners. Not going to happen. Sterling will prevail in a court of law over this one. You can not sign your constitutional rights away. This is settled law. This is roughly akin to the Home Owners Association voting to force you to sell your condo. They can vote it in, but enforcing it is a whole different matter.

And lastly, Sterling is a nobody from nowhere. What he does, or doesn't do, is of no lasting consequence to anyone. The world is filled with assholes, any quick scan of the GB will disabuse you of any notion you may have to the contrary. You can react to them, or ignore them. But either way you aren't going to change the nature of the asshole and the sun will still rise tomorrow morning.

Ishmael
 
Oh thank goodness. I've been waiting with bated breath for you to come in with your superior logic and knowledge to set us all straight on this issue. We can all sleep better now that you're on the job.
 
Yup, my first and my last.

Arguing over the legality of how the tape was obtained is pointless, it's out there and it's not going away.

Sterling was a known bigot for 30 some years. He was allowed to buy indulgences from various and sundry organizations, including the NAACP. So why does this set up, and that's what it is, appear now? Who did he fail to pay off? Who wants the team?

re. The fine. Peanuts, who cares?

re. The suspension. Symbolism over substance. He's the owner, he makes the decision as to when the check is written, to who, and for how much. Does the NBA really think they can appoint some third party to have unfettered access to Sterling's checking account?

re. The forced sale based on a vote of owners. Not going to happen. Sterling will prevail in a court of law over this one. You can not sign your constitutional rights away. This is settled law. This is roughly akin to the Home Owners Association voting to force you to sell your condo. They can vote it in, but enforcing it is a whole different matter.

And lastly, Sterling is a nobody from nowhere. What he does, or doesn't do, is of no lasting consequence to anyone. The world is filled with assholes, any quick scan of the GB will disabuse you of any notion you may have to the contrary. You can react to them, or ignore them. But either way you aren't going to change the nature of the asshole and the sun will still rise tomorrow morning.

Ishmael


Good summary to this thread: http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1024438
 
It looks like a conspiracy to steal the Clippers from Sterling to create a team with black owners. Use his racism against him by fucking his old lady and provoking a reaction that's recorded. Al and Jesse and Oprah are on hand for a payday.
 
It looks like a conspiracy to steal the Clippers from Sterling to create a team with black owners. Use his racism against him by fucking his old lady and provoking a reaction that's recorded. Al and Jesse and Oprah are on hand for a payday.


Quoted for hilarity.
 
You CAN sign your constituional rights away.

It happens all the time when criminals waive the right to have an attorney present during an interrogation or when a criminal enters a plea agreement and waives the right to a jury trial and to an appeal.

Confidential settlement agreements stifle free speech rights.

Regardless, surely the waiver has to informed. It has to be express and knowing.

Seems to me it's unlikely that the owners' agreement has an express waiver of free speech and free association rights.
 
sorta kinda funny

who sat in front row of Silver's assassination of Sterling

SPIKE LEE.....who a month ago said NO WHITES SHOULD LIVE IN HIS NEIGHBOORHOOD:cool:
 
we have reached a point in this country

where what you say IN YOUR HOME

can get your STUFF taken away

BTW, the GAZE are goin after the owners that are ANTI GAY MARRIAGE

Land of the FREE:rolleyes:
 
Back
Top