1sickbastard
Seriously?
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2010
- Posts
- 26,724
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
great opportunity for the pizza place next door that does
Yes, a business should be allowed to refuse service to any customers they want.
http://abhmuseum.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/WeWashForWhitePeople.jpg
Or did the US decide there was a problem with that?
"The Good Wife" did a mock trial on this issue last night. Interesting stuff.
Yes, a business should be allowed to refuse service to any customers they want.
http://abhmuseum.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/WeWashForWhitePeople.jpg
Or did the US decide there was a problem with that?
The Congress and POTUS decided in 1964 there was a problem with that. However, the law that was passed says nothing about sexual orientation.
It Begins: Restaurant owner says he won't provide pizzas for same-sex weddings
A pizza place is backing Indiana Governor Mike Pence for signing the state’s controversial Religious Freedom Act.
Of course liberuhls would be against freedom and religion.
Indiana has crap pizza.
I believe that Last Supper painting shows a passover meal.
The Congress and POTUS decided in 1964 there was a problem with that. However, the law that was passed says nothing about sexual orientation.
The point is that the very same arguments were made to justify refusing service to black people that are being made to justify refusing service to the LGBT community.
Same bigotry, different target.
"The Good Wife" last night included a segment on this where a mock court was set up on the Christian baker business. A wedding planner (they moved from the case of baker, who they decided had less of a leg to stand on than a wedding planner, to a case of a wedding planner). The wedding planner testified on how providing planning services for a gay wedding would put her at odds with the Bible. She was asked if she'd planned weddings for people who had been divorced. Yes. Then she was told there were zero instances in the Bible of condemning same-sex marriages, but three of condemning divorce.
The point is that the very same arguments were made to justify refusing service to black people that are being made to justify refusing service to the LGBT community.
Same bigotry, different target.
Except that's not true. Same sex unions existed then, certainly in the period covered by the new testament.Of course that would be because homosexuality was such a intolerable sin in the bible that it could never even be conceived of back then that they could get married.
I'm fairly certain you missed the point.The Congress and POTUS decided in 1964 there was a problem with that. However, the law that was passed says nothing about sexual orientation.
"The Good Wife" last night included a segment on this where a mock court was set up on the Christian baker business. A wedding planner (they moved from the case of baker, who they decided had less of a leg to stand on than a wedding planner, to a case of a wedding planner). The wedding planner testified on how providing planning services for a gay wedding would put her at odds with the Bible. She was asked if she'd planned weddings for people who had been divorced. Yes. Then she was told there were zero instances in the Bible of condemning same-sex marriages, but three of condemning divorce.
Yeah, well, the religious right, including the leaders of the Catholic Church, have turned Christianity into being anti gay and anti abortion and not much else.