Now don't y'all get mad at me or blame Bill Clinton or Al Sharpton

crazybbwgirl said:
I am not righteous. I rarely respond to BB's threads. But I almost always respond to yours. Besides - you should be the bigger man...
Correction - you have the most credibility and integrity where I'm concerned.

Well of course I've never known bisexplicit to be phony either, but I haven't known her as long.

I'll offer my apologies to you two.
 
LovingTongue said:
Correction - you have the most credibility and integrity where I'm concerned.

Well of course I've never known bisexplicit to be phony either, but I haven't known her as long.

I'll offer my apologies to you two.

Graciously accepted.

What the hell goes on in someone's life to make them go out and shoot 50 something people? Damn... I"ve had some rough times - but I've never been tempted to take out the McDonald - or whatever.... damn....
 
crazybbwgirl said:
Graciously accepted.

What the hell goes on in someone's life to make them go out and shoot 50 something people? Damn... I"ve had some rough times - but I've never been tempted to take out the McDonald - or whatever.... damn....
It's called insanity. Raging insanity. And now that the shooter is dead, there won't even be much justice.
 
crazybbwgirl said:
I am not righteous. I rarely respond to BB's threads. But I almost always respond to yours. Besides - you should be the bigger man...
:confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :( :( :(
 
RawHumor said:
That's part of it... I guess that, unbeknownst to myself, I had come to put LT on a higher level than I had put BB.

I didn't even realize it until today.

Way to prove my subconscious wrong. LOL

Just so this post wasn't missed at the bottom of the page...

The sad thing is, before today, I was actually starting to get along with LT and BB on occasion.
 
RawHumor said:
Just so this post wasn't missed at the bottom of the page...

The sad thing is, before today, I was actually starting to get along with LT and BB on occasion.
You actually agree with MOST of what I say

You are a COWARD and afraid to say so, often

Cause your "friends" here wont "like" you!
 
RawHumor said:
Just so this post wasn't missed at the bottom of the page...

The sad thing is, before today, I was actually starting to get along with LT and BB on occasion.
RH,
Ease up a bit. Neither one of them was trying to do what their posts read.
Everyone makes mistakes in judgment.
 
LovingTongue said:
Correction - you have the most credibility and integrity where I'm concerned.

Well of course I've never known bisexplicit to be phony either, but I haven't known her as long.

I'll offer my apologies to you two.

Thank you.

I'm glad to know that you aren't actually as dismissive as you make it appear like you are in your first post.
 
bisexplicit said:
Thank you.

I'm glad to know that you aren't actually as dismissive as you make it appear like you are in your first post.
Please be nice to me as well














































:D
 
bisexplicit said:
Thank you.

I'm glad to know that you aren't actually as dismissive as you make it appear like you are in your first post.
Especially considering the wide and random spread of killing sprees across the US... :eek: :(
 
busybody said:
You actually agree with MOST of what I say

You are a COWARD and afraid to say so, often

Cause your "friends" here wont "like" you!

When I agree with you, I state it.

But you're largely racist, and quite often boring and cartoonish... a living stereotype.

That's why I didn't read your thread.
 
RawHumor said:
When I agree with you, I state it.

But you're largely racist, and quite often boring and cartoonish... a living stereotype.

That's why I didn't read your thread.
If advocating the MASS EXTERMINATION of Mooseshits is racist, I AM!

I am boorish, but rarely BORING!

If you dont read my shit, its YOUR loss!
 
Daily Standard: The Problem of the Lone-Wolf Terrorist
By Daveed Gartenstein-Ross

Last week, I blogged about why, even if Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar's explanation that he ran down nine people at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in retaliation for U.S. foreign policy is an accurate description of his motives, he cannot be prosecuted for a terrorist offense or receive a sentencing enhancement due to his motivations. Today an expanded discussion of this issue appears in the Daily Standard. An excerpt:

REGARDLESS OF TAHERI-AZAR'S TRUE MOTIVE, this case points to a real legal problem: Even if his statements trumpeting jihadist motivations are true, authorities can neither charge him with a terrorist offense, nor seek a sentencing enhancement based on his terrorist motives. This points to a significant blind spot in dealing with terrorism in the United States.

Taheri-azar is being prosecuted in state court, and North Carolina doesn't have an applicable terrorism offense that can be brought to bear against him. The state only has two statutory provisions dealing with terrorist incidents. One bans weapons of mass destruction, while the other amends the murder offense. The amendment to the murder offense doesn't apply here--not only because Taheri-azar didn't murder anybody, but also because it only applies when the murder was performed with a nuclear, biological, or chemical weapon.

The federal sentencing guidelines do contain a sentencing enhancement in �3A1.4 for offenses intended to promote a federal crime of terrorism. In turn, 18 U.S.C. � 2232b(g)(5) sensibly defines the predicate intention for a federal crime of terrorism as actions "calculated to influence or affect the conduct of government by intimidation or coercion, or to retaliate against government conduct." While this provision may seem at first glance to apply to Taheri-azar, it doesn't provide federal courts with independent jurisdiction. Rather, the terrorist intentions must be coupled with an independent federal crime.

Quite simply, prosecutors would have trouble getting Taheri-azar into federal court because it appears that he committed no federal crime. The prosecution could argue that there was a federal civil rights violation because this was carried out on the basis of religion. But Taheri-azar didn't target his victims on the basis of their religion. He may have been motivated by religion, but federal civil rights laws really only come into play when the victim is targeted because of his religion. And Taheri-azar's SUV didn't discriminate between Muslim, Jew, Christian and Hindu. Federal hate crime laws seem inapplicable for the same reason.
 
busybody said:
If advocating the MASS EXTERMINATION of Mooseshits is racist, I AM!

I am boorish, but rarely BORING!

If you dont read my shit, its YOUR loss!
Thanks for proving my point.
 
LovingTongue said:
*taps fingers*

You know, the only person I really honestly believe is righteous here is CrazyBBWGirl. You might be telling the truth here but I just ain't feelin' it.

You are obviously entitled to your opinion, you and I have had our run ins, but I don't think I have ever been accused of being a liar or two faced.
 
LT, please (dont) kill yourself

but


So the killer wasn’t a typical gun-crazed American after all.

What a bitter disappointment for our watchdog media.


:D
 
busybody said:
LT, please (dont) kill yourself

but


So the killer wasn’t a typical gun-crazed American after all.

What a bitter disappointment for our watchdog media.


:D
It wasn't one of your hated MOO SLAMS either. Pity for Fox News.
 
Back
Top