Now Egypt; again

First, I have never met the mustard that needed to be cut . . . unless it gets mouthy, in which case you might as well just shoot it.


Second, what's wrong with "bitches just hate each other?"


It tells the tr000th and makes a point.
 
Two Churches hit on Palm Sunday. Dozens killed.


It's interesting the coinciding of egypt's president WH visit.

See, there's a theory here. Obama did not give the attacks replies? Seems to have deterred further offensives.

When retaliation is offered, then the beast will get excited and seek more attention for it's cause.

The paradox of this context is cruel.

This would get you a 'D' at best in any English writing course and an 'F' in any logic class.

The word is its, for example...

A paradox cannot be cruel, for another.
 
First, I have never met the mustard that needed to be cut . . . unless it gets mouthy, in which case you might as well just shoot it.


Second, what's wrong with "bitches just hate each other?"


It tells the tr000th and makes a point.

I't about cutting the mustard seed and is very old.


JBJ once wanted to battle me to the death over the phrase because he conflated that phrase with the other old standard, "doesn't pass muster,' and came up with 'doesn't cut muster...'


;) ;)
 
I see an end solution as many people here have been pointing out. Abandon our ally Israel and force them to nuke, murder and kill or accept a second genocide in less than the span of one century. But, as simple as that sounds, it would not stop the clash of cultures any more than the election of President Obama solved our own domestic culture clash...

And yes, some of our interventions did have positive effects, but because of our own internecine battle over the course of our culture and reemergence of the "its none of our business" mindset, we abandoned several Muslim allies and left them friendless in their own internecine battle for the heart of their culture.


Still not seeing an end solution for bringing a lasting peace to the region.

What positive military interventions are talking about?
 
Still not seeing an end solution for bringing a lasting peace to the region.

What positive military interventions are talking about?

Where has lasting peace in any region been achieved?

This is tantamount to a "those people" type of comment...

;) ;)

All due respect, it might sound somewhat snide, but really, has any form of government found a way to abrogate human nature?
 
We know some do -- mainly religious minorities who fear what might happen to them under any other regime -- but it's fairly obvious most don't.

But that's not true. Go to the pipeline wars thread, check the videos of huge pro Assad rallies, and tell me it's wrong.

Oh wait, you don't like being proven wrong.
 
But that's not true. Go to the pipeline wars thread, check the videos of huge pro Assad rallies, and tell me it's wrong.

Oh wait, you don't like being proven wrong.

Of course there are huge Assad rallies. There were huge Trump rallies. It is no proof of majority support, only of some support.
 
Of course there are huge Assad rallies. There were huge Trump rallies. It is no proof of majority support, only of some support.

No that's not a proper comparison.

The only few protests against Assad were a few hundred bearded men coming out of mosques.

In any case, why do i care if you agree. :)
 
You need to do a little research on ISIS in the Sinai and the ongoing violence against the Copts that exploded when President Obama decided that Mubarek was a very bad man and he had to go...


The fact that they ordered an attack with no prior planning or intent, based upon a Holy Day, shows either a disrespect for their intelligence and determination or an ignorance founded in your distaste in who the American People chose as their leader.

I agree.ISIS attacked the Coptics many times over the years
 
Maybe if we quit meddling in the Middle East they wouldn't be pissied off at us. ?

It's been a while since I've heard anyone utter that kind of liberal stupidity. If we were nicer to those medieval savages they wouldn't want to kill us. Guess what, Shemp, are they killing, torturing, and raping hundreds of thousands of their innocent countrymen - Christians and Muslims - because they hate US?

What was their excuse before the US even existed?
 
Let's face it, it it weren't for the religious angle, no one would be paying attention to their violence. I've lived long enough to to have seen violence in just about every region of the world and have studied enough to know how it has been part of every region of the world.

As the home of three of our planet's religions, whatever happens is paid attention to by significant parts of the planet especially when Islam rears its ugly head and decides to decimate members of the other two religions of the book.

Currently they are doing to the Christians that which they so dearly desire to do to the Jews and if we listed to those angry voices among us who want us to do the Pontius Pilate and wash our hands of Israel and turn our back to its execution, it surely will be attempted and we might end up with a major nuclear conflict on our hands...
 
It's been a while since I've heard anyone utter that kind of liberal stupidity. If we were nicer to those medieval savages they wouldn't want to kill us. Guess what, Shemp, are they killing, torturing, and raping hundreds of thousands of their innocent countrymen - Christians and Muslims - because they hate US?

What was their excuse before the US even existed?

Well, American intervention has not improved matters much, has it?
 
Back
Top