DeluxAuto
AntiSocial Extrovert
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2010
- Posts
- 23,591
Like using extraneous ellipses?But still wrong on every level...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Like using extraneous ellipses?But still wrong on every level...
Now go back and trace down why Lord Faucci went against EVERY bit of advice from pretty much anyone who is involved with infectious diseases that shutting down/locking down is NOT the thing to do. He changed his mind in less than two months. With no explanation to this day as far as I can see.You're right, I conflated COVID-19 and 2019. Let's go this route...
'It's going to disappear':
A timeline of Trump's claims that Covid-19 will vanish
View attachment 2514955
Is it the opinion of the NYT?Wait, isn't a published opinion from someone else just as good as yours? Or mine? Or...?
I mean how difficult is it, really, to get off your ass and do the googie woogie for yourself?
Scientists change their position as the data changes. Ya know, because science.Now go back and trace down why Lord Faucci went against EVERY bit of advice from pretty much anyone who is involved with infectious diseases that shutting down/locking down is NOT the thing to do. He changed his mind in less than two months. With no explanation to this day as far as I can see.
You can post President Trump’s quotes all you want but remember who was advising him.
Help us out, who was advising him?Now go back and trace down why Lord Faucci went against EVERY bit of advice from pretty much anyone who is involved with infectious diseases that shutting down/locking down is NOT the thing to do. He changed his mind in less than two months. With no explanation to this day as far as I can see.
You can post President Trump’s quotes all you want but remember who was advising him.
It's an opinion about what they perceived as the NYT opinion.Is it the opinion of the NYT?
IndividualIs it the opinion of the NYT?
Yup, not the NYT. Hopefully he’ll have better luck next time.Individual
You know damn well who was advising him. The point is Lord Fauc didn’t “follow the science” and went rouge, We still don’t know why…well, we have a good idea, but HE hasn’t explained it. That’s the tell.Help us out, who was advising him?
And please also let us know who hired him and who was his boss while he was doing all these things you think were stupid?
So you have no idea who was advising him. Thanks, glad we can agree on that.You know damn well who was advising him. The point is Lord Fauc didn’t “follow the science” and went rouge, We still don’t know why…well, we have a good idea, but HE hasn’t explained it. That’s the tell.
How'd I fuck up? You're not dead, just broke.So you, like Dick's Asshole, fucked up and thought you were clever while doing so?
Saying amazing isn't strong enough...
How'd I fuck up? You're not dead, just broke.
lol, you're were too broke to pay your internet. I'd be embarrassed too.You fucked up by ASSUMING something without any actual information yet treating it like a fact.
And then you doubled down on that turd.
lol, you're were too broke to pay your internet. I'd be embarrassed too.
And the OP gets everything backwards and WRONG. (MAGAt Bizarro World behavior, once again.)
THE MAGAts are the ones who IMMEDIATELY went to PROMOTING / DECLARING AS FACT the racist conspiracy theory of the lab leak, using “Wuhan flu” and “Kung flu”, etc, to describe the virus.
And, ultimately:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy8095xjg4po.amp
Hope that ^ helps.
![]()
By the way, there is no definitive evidence of the origins of the virus. It could have come from a lab and it could have come from the market. Those who claim either are a lie, simply are leaping to conclusions based on their bias.
Incorrect. There is still, to this day, not enough evidence to confirm either. That includes the information you say was dismissed.Lol.
Wrong. There's a ton of evidence but it was dismissed as "misinformation" by those who preferred censorship in the name of free speech. Read the article and understand how wrong you are. And were. And continue to be.
Incorrect. There is still, to this day, not enough evidence to confirm either. That includes the information you say was dismissed.
Which specific lab did they find the evidence in? How much of the virus did they find?who were the scientists involved?Wrong. Fauci even explained this but then tried to claim that he wasn't involved even though he was the guy who gave the go ahead for the ILLEGAL funding of Covid research in Wu Han.
We know where it came from. The entire world knows where it came from. Not speculation, not politics, WE FUCKING KNOW.
Then there's people like you who refuse to accept it because it wrecks your entire worldview. You're wrong. You were wrong then, you're wrong now, and you'll continue to be wrong until you change your mindset and accept that you've been lied to because you were a gullible fool.
Which is difficult to do and the reason why you (and all the rest of the Left progressives) are hanging on so tightly to your fantasies.
Which specific lab did they find the evidence in? How much of the virus did they find?who were the scientists involved?
There is evidence of a lab leak. There is evidence of it coming from the wet.marker.
Youve made your conclusions based on your bias.
I have and I accept them. You're the one who hasn'tYou need to read more on the subject. Your refusal to accept the truth is mired in your acceptance of censorship of the facts. The facts are actually out there, you just do what you always do and sit on your ass instead of going to find them.