Obama admits he has no strategy on ISIS

[Sean Renaud]

President Obama isn't up to the job. The next President will have to take care of it.

He's more than up for the task, whether or not he'll complete it is anybody's guess but I'd agree probably not. That doesn't answer the question though. After what happened last time and the amount of face we lost and damage we did why would you want us to go alone instead of building a coalition with the ability to do the job "properly" or at least better than was done last time?

 

[IrezumiKiss]

He's more than up for the task, whether or not he'll complete it is anybody's guess but I'd agree probably not. That doesn't answer the question though. After what happened last time and the amount of face we lost and damage we did why would you want us to go alone instead of building a coalition with the ability to do the job "properly" or at least better than was done last time?

Why are you asking questions that are clearly beyond Vette's cognitive reach? You'll short-circuit the old boy with that!

*twirls villainous moustache* Oh, I see your game. You're a devious sort, aren't you, Master Renaud?

 

[unregistered]

 

[Beco]

Vette and the next President know how to solve the Middle East.

Wait, because our President goes on TV, says he doesnt have a strategy for the middle east, now he will outline his strategy on Wednesday night. He failed at peace talks with Israel and palestine, took out gaddafi, drew a red line, moved the red line....and struggled to get stuff done over there, so now its..... lets see if you can do any better???

 

[Sean Renaud]

Wait, because our President goes on TV, says he doesnt have a strategy for the middle east, now he will outline his strategy on Wednesday night. He failed at peace talks with Israel and palestine, took out gaddafi, drew a red line, moved the red line....and struggled to get stuff done over there, so now its..... lets see if you can do any better???

He didn't say he didn't have a strategy for the Middle East. He said specifically that he didn't have a strategy for ISIS in Syria. Likely because he's not sure if we should help the Syrian government put down the rebels who are ISIS. The same rebels that this time last year the RWCJ was blaming Obama for not supporting more openly and aggressively. Now maybe you guys were right. Maybe if Obama had stpped in and helped ISIS win quickly and definitively they'd be happily working with us right now to secure Iraq.

Everybody in modern history has failed at peace talks with Israel and Palestine. I mean sure he did, but you might as well give him shit for the fact that he's never beaten Tiger Woods in golf despite all the hours he plays.

Took out Ghadaffi, mostly people agree that's a good thing, drew a redline, moved it. Not exactly what happened but sure. Whatever. It's still not "lets' see if you can do any better." It's sarcasm that Vette thinks Obama isn't up for the task given his track record.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Sean Renaud]

So far he hasn't been up to the job, so there's no reason to believe he ever will be. "He's a little man in a great big job."

That's your opinion, plenty of us disagree and think he's done the best job possible with the available tools.

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[Sean Renaud]

It's the opinion of a majority of the country. He has all of the tools he needs, but he's afraid to use them. Too weak to protect the national interest. Not up to the job, simple.

He does not and has never had the support, even in spirit of the Republican Party, so no he doesn't have all the tools he needs. As you so often bring up when Bush wanted to go to war Democrats fell inline like good little boys and girls and presented a united front to the world. Because up until President Blackenstien that was what we did. We presented a unified front. If the next president is Republican you're probably right, we'll fall in line like good little boys and girls, if it's a Democrat you'll continue to sabotage the country because you hate us more than you love the country.

ISIL vs ISIS is important? Sure. . . keep up that dividing!

 

[lovecraft68]

Good. Why do you want anything different after our last debacle?

If this was his first term he would go for it. Second term" he'll let someone else try to do his dirty work while he tries to salvage Obamacare, the immigration.....

I think Isis would be easier.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

The last l they don't want to stand for Syria."

Wut?

Chuck Todd having seizures now, or is this another standard Vettefail®?

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxpj6grFIe1qcaomb.gif

 

[Sean Renaud]

If this was his first term he would go for it. Second term" he'll let someone else try to do his dirty work while he tries to salvage Obamacare, the immigration.....

I think Isis would be easier.

I don't see why which term he's on has anything to do with deliberately fucking up. Going alone was a dumb plan twelve years ago and it's a dumb plan now. There's nothing to salvage of Obamacare, it seems to be working more or less as advertised with a few glitches but nothing he would be wise to bother with. He'll probably work on immigration though.

 

[unregistered]

 

[BotanyBoy]

He himself has said he has no strategy, so what is it that Republicans have to agree with, his incompetence? His inability to decide what to do? It's up to Obama to lead, he's the CinC. So why can't he lead?

Obama is the one who is dividing the issue into two convenient sectors, so he can avoid dealing with the source.

You keep avoiding the question........

What is it he's supposed to be leading to? Another endless holy war in the middle east?? We all know why you have such a boner for that idea, welfare queen, but back in the real world most of us find that and you quite appalling. Not to mention dumber than fuck to go blow such a huge amount of money for absolutely no return.

What strategy should he have beyond keeping them the fuck out of our backyard?

We know you can't answer that because it would shit all over your delusional position....so just keep ignoring reality and living in your Alex Jones style crazy land.

 

[Sean Renaud]

He himself has said he has no strategy, so what is it that Republicans have to agree with, his incompetence? His inability to decide what to do? It's up to Obama to lead, he's the CinC. So why can't he lead?

Obama is the one who is dividing the issue into two convenient sectors, so he can avoid dealing with the source.

No, he has not said he had no strategy. That's a lie. However the Republicans should be making suggestions and they clearly have not. It is up to him to lead, but it's also up to you to follow and you haven't.

Obama is not the one dividing, you've been attacking him since before he even stepped into office.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

He himself has said he has no strategy, so what is it that Republicans have to agree with, his incompetence? His inability to decide what to do? It's up to Obama to lead, he's the CinC. So why can't he lead?

Obama is the one who is dividing the issue into two convenient sectors, so he can avoid dealing with the source.

All this no strategy no leading bullshit is why two main terrorist biggies were taken out this past week. But yeah, you and your geriatric pussy glee club didn't make any whine n' bitch threads about them, didya?

Thought so. Keep yelling at the clouds, Methuselah.

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxpj6grFIe1qcaomb.gif

 

[Amberchgo]

That's your opinion, plenty of us disagree and think he's done the best job possible with the available tools.

In his handling of foreign policy, President Barack Obama has record-high disapproval ratings according to the latest Wall Street Journal-NBC News poll released Tuesday.

Sixty-percent disapprove of Obama’s job on foreign policy, the president’s worst rating on the issue, the paper reported. Only 36 percent approve of Obama’s handling of foreign policy.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/...inks-foreign-policy-109743.html#ixzz3Cg7vJfen



Yes. 36% think he's doing a fine job on foreign policy.

 

[unregistered]

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Please inform CNN of your superior knowledge of what Obama said:

Obama on ISIS in Syria: 'We don't have a strategy yet'
By Chelsea J. Carter, Catherine E. Shoichet and Hamdi Alkhshali, CNN
updated 6:34 PM EDT, Thu September 4, 2014

http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/28/world/meast/isis-iraq-syria/


I've attacked him as being unfit for the job. He himself has proved me right beyond all expectation. His numbers are the lowest of his presidency, so the majority is with me, not you and the other toe sucking embarrassments to common sense.

http://mgoblog.com/sites/mgoblog.com/files/1f6ec6a15815_A33C/oldmanyellsatcloud_thumb.jpg

 

[unregistered]

 

[BotanyBoy]

It's time to school SeanR again on who is the "problem." Read for a change and understand that Obama refuses to listen to his own party, let alone any Republicans:


BOB WOODWARD: OBAMA HAS COMPLETELY ALIENATED SENATE DEMOCRATS


on BREITBART TV 7 Sep 2014, 1:53 PM PDT

On "Fox News Sunday," The Washington Post's Bob Woodward described what he called "one of the untold stories," in Washington D.C., which is the "alienation between Obama and Senate Democrats" because according to Woodward "he is not engaged" and refuses to listen.

Woodward said, "Well, he's got to engage in the process. and he is not engaged."

He continued, "For instance on Tuesday he's going to have the congressional leaders down to the White House. Is it going to be everyone states their point of view and the meeting lasts an hour, maybe two hours? He needs to have some head to head discussions with people."

"The president needs to learn to listen," Woodward said. "These people have points of view and there are ways to work. I mean, he won't do a deal on lots of things. This is something -- this is a serious ISIS, serious national security threat. Talk to the intel people and they are trembling about it, and so it's not something you can just do all by yourself. You need to get the congress and you need to get the public involved."

"What's interesting is how out of touch the White House is with the Senate Democrats," he added. "One of the untold stories here is the alienation between Obama and Senate Democrats. They meet and they talk, but you talk to people who are there and they say there isn't much communication."

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-...ats?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

No where in there is a plan from the RWCJ to deal with the ISIS issue. LOL fucking moron.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Obama has completely alienated Senate Democrats. . .says Brietbart. Find a source that isn't known for lying.

-snip-


Yes. 36% think he's doing a fine job on foreign policy.

Sounds fine to me honestly. We know how divided the country is. So basically a little more than half of people giving him a chance think he's just fine. I'm not at all worried.

Please inform CNN of your superior knowledge of what Obama said:

Obama on ISIS in Syria: 'We don't have a strategy yet'
By Chelsea J. Carter, Catherine E. Shoichet and Hamdi Alkhshali, CNN
updated 6:34 PM EDT, Thu September 4, 2014

http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/28/world/meast/isis-iraq-syria/


I've attacked him as being unfit for the job. He himself has proved me right beyond all expectation. His numbers are the lowest of his presidency, so the majority is with me, not you and the other toe sucking embarrassments to common sense.

So ISIS within the borders of Syria is the entire Middle East? I'm curious, if your wife doesn't know if she should serve the red wine or the white does that constitute not having dinner plans in your world?

 

[Amberchgo]

Obama has completely alienated Senate Democrats. . .says Brietbart. Find a source that isn't known for lying.



Sounds fine to me honestly. We know how divided the country is. So basically a little more than half of people giving him a chance think he's just fine. I'm not at all worried.

LOL ... Looney left math ... 36% = 50%

 

[Sean Renaud]

LOL ... Looney left math ... 36% = 50%

Of the people who are giving him a chance. That's an important detail. No president is going to get much north of 60%, that's just where we are as a nation these days. Whether that's good or bad isn't really up to me, we're also a nation of haters. And haters gonna hate.