Obama legacy: "The US has not been in worse racial condition in 60 years"

[hashtag4]

The edits seem like cover ups. Most here could care less where you are from or what you look like. Being lied to is different, not sure if I can define why. Your changing story line(s) are flakey.

You and your ilk of Blurt thread male posters keep pooping out all these nonsensical conspiracy theories about
- men who pretend to be women on the GB because they lust after and want to catfish the oh so sexy Blurt thread males (newsflash, honey: I don't find any of you idiots to be appealing, so why would I even try to catfish you? Even if I were a gay male)
- indians and pakistanis who pretend to be from Southern Europe,

Not only that you keep coming up with these jaw - dropping theories, but you also harass posters for months or even years on end because of that.


I sometimes wonder whether I give you Blurt thread douchebags too much credit by assuming that you're xenophobes and homophobes (you keep trying to convince me that xenophobia is not what's driving your bizarre paranoia).
Instead of just plain fucking idiots

 

[Queertag45]

Sure. Why not?

You have edited out every one of your original posts about being a dude, being in a relationship with a dude, living in India, then in Pakistan, being a tranny, and then finally being a woman.

What part of your bullshit story should we believe? The one you desperately try to make real or the one(s) that you have hidden, lied about, and edited away?

Amen, Brother!

 

[hashtag4]

And even if, let's hypothesize, I, Ann and many in the long line of posters whom you idiots harassed and cyberstalked
were men pretending to be women, what's the big deal? That role play didn't harm amyone, as far as I know.

Newsflash, petey: few or maybe none of the women who post on the GB want to cyberfvck you, Rob and his alts, Disgustipated and Emerson. They just see you as their gal-pals.

It's just you who confuse their friendship with something else, and let it get to your head.
So you assume that you're hot commodities on the market, hence all these "men pretending to be women" in order to get into your pants.

 

[Saint Peter]

You and your ilk of Blurt thread male posters keep pooping out all these nonsensical conspiracy theories about
- men who pretend to be women on the GB because they lust after and want to catfish the oh so sexy Blurt thread males (newsflash, honey: I don't find any of you idiots to be appealing, so why would I even try to catfish you? Even if I were a gay male)
- indians and pakistanis who pretend to be from Southern Europe,

Not only that you keep coming up with these jaw - dropping theories, but you also harass posters for months or even years on end because of that.


I sometimes wonder whether I give you Blurt thread douchebags too much credit by assuming that you're xenophobes and homophobes (you keep trying to convince me that xenophobia is not what's driving your bizarre paranoia).
Instead of just plain fucking idiots

You are the one switching teams and editing posts. Don't be so paranoid.

A jaw dropping theory would be that AJ makes you to present as a female so his republican buddies will accept the two of you have a thing going on and leaving you free to cybersuck each others cocks.

Just a theory.

 

[hashtag4]

You are the one switching teams and editing posts. Don't be so paranoid.

A jaw dropping theory would be that AJ makes you to present as a female so his republican buddies will accept the two of you have a thing going on and leaving you free to cybersuck each others cocks.

Just a theory.

Why are you so preoccupied with my genitals?

Wanna cyberfvck?

 

[Queertag45]

http://moroccantimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/man-anal-sex-Morocco-cuncumber.jpg

 

[Queertag45]

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/32/1d/8c/321d8cc28bd33e183ed52da5b0a6976d.jpg

 

[Queertag45]

3.Is it true?

http://www.dailyxtra.com/sites/default/files/blog/img/gay_drill.jpg

 

[magicalmoments]

I suspect that when USA was enslaving an entire race of people i.e. Before Martin Luther King jr that it was worse.

 

[Queertag45]

I suspect that when USA was enslaving an entire race of people i.e. Before Martin Luther King jr that it was worse.

The OP hates blacks, he has expressed this sentiment many times, so to him those were the good old days.

 

[Conager]

I suspect that when USA was enslaving an entire race of people i.e. Before Martin Luther King jr that it was worse.

Yes. The day that Martin Luther King issued the Emancipation Proclamation was a good day indeed.

 

[Saint Peter]

I suspect that when USA was enslaving an entire race of people i.e. Before Martin Luther King jr that it was worse.

I would agree. Each decade seemed to get better, at least from my limited viewpoint, than the decade before. More acceptance. It is nothing to see a mixed race couple now with mixed race children.

Kickback. Protests. Now a leader that wants to build walls and fill the supreme court with conservatives. What seemed to be going so well today is looking bleak.

 

[Tigersman]

Legacy

Obama's legacy has nothing to do with racial relations. Racial tension can be laid at the feet of law enforcement agencies whose officers have either killed or beaten blacks. These officers were for the most part found innocent of any wrong doing because the investigation was done by the law enforcement agency thet worked for.

Obama's legacy will show he failed to accomplish much during his term in office but that can be laid at the feet of the Republican controlled Congress who fought anything Obama wanted to do. The GOP no longer stands for the Grand Old Party but rather Greedy Old People. As a republican I hope the GOP is laid to rest soon.

 

[LincolnDuncan]

The rich get richer but the poor get more powerful. The Arab Spring in 2010 showed the world that there is strength in numbers. No matter if the protests were right or wrong, we say kings toppled and leadership changed. The 99% people picked up on this. The reaction to perceived heavy handed law enforcement was fueled by this. Years ago you would watch to cops pull somebody out of the car (no matter of guilt or innocence) and you would keep walking down the street. Today you pull out your cell phone and start recording.

I do not blame Obama for the Arab Spring or the protests on Wall Street. It happened on his watch, but so did my cat dying. The cat was old. Obama had nothing to do with it.

But do you have any evidence that Obama didn't kill your cat.

I've been hearing things

I don't know but people are saying

 

[hashtag4]

1.The rich get richer but the poor get more powerful. The Arab Spring in 2010 showed the world that there is strength in numbers. No matter if the protests were right or wrong, we say kings toppled and leadership changed. The 99% people picked up on this. The reaction to perceived heavy handed law enforcement was fueled by this.

2. Years ago you would watch to cops pull somebody out of the car (no matter of guilt or innocence) and you would keep walking down the street. Today you pull out your cell phone and start recording.

3.I do not blame Obama for the Arab Spring or the protests on Wall Street. It happened on his watch, but so did my cat dying. The cat was old. Obama had nothing to do with it.

I agree with everything that you said. Just a few comments:

1.2 As you clearly implied, this "mass awakening" has to do (among other things) with the widespread availability of the internet (and of information and of means of communication between laypeople ) and technology (cellphones and so on).
They're both instruments of manipullation for some, and of 'awakening' for others.

3.Indeed.
Not his fault, he didn't create the problem which once developped just snowballed , like all problems do.
But did he try to do anything to stop it? Or did he unknowingly feed into both
- the racist attitudes against blacks,
- and the splitting between whites, latinos and blacks
and worsened the problem?

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Which is why I often shake my head and roll my eyes at those who call me and others "racists", just because we didn't like Obama as a president
(not Obama as a man of course, because there's much to admire from that point of view as in looks, sophistication and class. Such a contrast to your other presidents Bush, Clinton and Trump lol)

He clearly doesn't identify with his black heritage other than being aware that he too was subjected to prejudice and possibly discrimination because of it.
(If he did, he would have been more emotionally attached to the cause and more active in lobbying for blacks, instead of running and avoiding the issue, but for the occasional touchy- feely discourse).

He seems to identify a lot more with the other part of his upbringing: his privileged background and his Ivy League Yale education. He seems to be more loyal to them than to the working class or even middle class individual, regardless of their colour.
Because he showed again and again that he chose to be on the side of Corporations whenebpver he had to choose between the two.

 

[Emerson40]

Which is why I often shake my head and roll my eyes at those who call me and others "racists", just because we didn't like Obama as a president

That is not why you are, and many have called you, a racist.

But, nice try.

 

[hashtag4]

Remove user from ignore listEmerson40
This message is hidden because Emerson40 is on your ignore list.

Obama's legacy will show he failed to accomplish much during his term in office but that can be laid at the feet of the Republican controlled Congress who fought anything Obama wanted to do.

On the other hand I just read this, which one or two other posters mentioned as well in the past.
And for me it puts an entirely different spin on this entire fiasco. (as in what caused it or more likely, what maintained it).

How much power does an american president hold, or does the Congress hold a lot more power?

 

[BotanyBoy]

I would agree.

Of course you would, people today are totally enslaved by the evil white man.

Each decade seemed to get better, at least from my limited viewpoint, than the decade before. More acceptance. It is nothing to see a mixed race couple now with mixed race children.

And nothing about that has changed.

Kickback. Protests.

Most of which were all about economy and not race. Unless (D)'s out killing cops and beating up white people for being white. The vast majority of racism and political racism has been on the left.

Now a leader that wants to build walls and fill the supreme court with conservatives.

Oh noes not border security and Constitutionalism!!! That would just be fucking horrible for the Socialist agenda!

What seemed to be going so well today is looking bleak.

Sorry your racist political bullshit got shut down. Lucky for you Germany seems bound and determined to self destruct so you can have that as a consolation prize.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Obama's legacy has nothing to do with racial relations.

LOL then you are willfully blind.

Beating up elderly white people for being white is now considered "peaceful protest" by the social justice Democrats.

Racial tension can be laid at the feet of law enforcement agencies whose officers have either killed or beaten blacks.

Do you not know who the chief law enforcement officer over the whole USA is?


http://a5.files.biography.com/image/upload/c_fill,cs_srgb,dpr_1.0,g_face,h_300,q_80,w_300/MTE4MDAzNDEwNzg5ODI4MTEw.jpg

 

[hashtag4]

Obama's legacy will show he failed to accomplish much during his term in office but that can be laid at the feet of the Republican controlled Congress who fought anything Obama wanted to do. The GOP no longer stands for the Grand Old Party but rather Greedy Old People. As a republican I hope the GOP is laid to rest soon.

On the other hand I just read this, which one or two other posters mentioned as well in the past.
And for me it puts an entirely different spin on this entire fiasco. (as in what caused it or more likely, what maintained it).

How much power does an american president hold, or does the Congress hold a lot more power?

ETA

On the other hand, I remember someone else (AJ, I believe) saying that the reason for both the US and international (since the US is still The empire with the most power) fiasco lies in the fact that the press (very important tool for democracy, since it informs the public of any wrongdoings) and other power brokers were loyal to the Democratic party which Obama represented.
((Democratic/Liberal parties who many in Europe and US know already , have betrayed their mantra and their constituents and now cater mostly for Corporations and the Elite.))

And that's why AJ was hoping for a republican president. To tip the scale a bit more and even the balance of power.

I'm obviously not versed in political matters espec. the US, but I'm still understandably and seriously confused.
Whose pov is more valid?

 

[Saint Peter]

Of course you would, people today are totally enslaved by the evil white man.

White men have power, weapons, and money that many others cannot equal. It does not automatically make us king of beasts.

And nothing about that has changed.

There has been a change. The masses have been awakened. Theirs is a strength of numbers and faceless hoodies. They do not wear red uniforms and march in straight lines. This is going to get worse before it gets better.

Most of which were all about economy and not race. Unless (D)'s out killing cops and beating up white people for being white. The vast majority of racism and political racism has been on the left.

Bullshit. Race has everything to do with the rough rides. It is not the left creating this. It is born of generations of conservative white dudes laying the heavy hand. Paybacks are a bitch.

Oh noes not border security and Constitutionalism!!! That would just be fucking horrible for the Socialist agenda!

I never said that. I have been in favor of better border control since you were pooping yellow. Donald waving his sword and claiming that Mexico is going to pay for it? Yeah, that is going to happen! It was a lie, like numerous lies (steel plants reopening in PA? Really??) to get votes. Plenty were sucked in by the fervor.

Just like Germany.

http://orig12.deviantart.net/8655/f/2012/216/e/9/nuremberg_rally_3_by_themistrunsred-d59tgv3.jpg

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Petey thought his team was going to win the Superbowl this year too...



Reality is a harsh mistress.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Those people who keep crowing about the greatness of Obama have still not grasped the totality of his political defeat even as he angles in his last days for the UN "President of the World" post...

 

[hashtag4]

I started another thread about it, but I'm also throwing it in here, in case it ties in with what some posters are discussing :

Top Ex-White House Economist Admits 94% Of All New Jobs Under Obama Were Part-Time
by Tyler Durden. Dec 25, 2016 10:34 AM
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...ts-94-all-new-jobs-under-obama-were-part-time

1."We predicted (… ) that in light of the underlying changes resulting from the second great depression, America is shifting from a traditional work force, one where the majority of new employment is retained on a full-time basis, to a "gig" economy, where workers are severely disenfranchised, and enjoy far less employment leverage, job stability and perks than their pre-crash peers.

2.Fast forward 6 years, when a report by Harvard and Princeton economists Lawrence Katz and Alan Krueger, confirms exactly what we warned. In their study, the duo show that from 2005 to 2015, the proportion of Americans workers engaged in what they refer to as “alternative work” soared during the Obama era, from 10.7% in 2005 to 15.8% in 2015.

Krueger, who until 2013 was also the top White House economist serving as chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers under Obama, was "surprised" by the finding.
“We find that 94% of net job growth in the past decade was in the alternative work category,” said Krueger. “And over 60% was due to the [the rise] of independent contractors, freelancers and contract company workers.” In other words, nearly all of the 10 million jobs created between 2005 and 2015 were not traditional nine-to-five employment.

3.While the finding is good news for some, such as graphic designers and lawyers who hate going to an office, for whom new technology and Obamacare has made it more appealing to become an independent contractor. But for those seeking a steady administrative assistant office job, the market is grim.
It also explains why despite an apparent recovery in the labor market, wage growth has been non-existant, due to the lack of career advancement and salary increase options for this vast cohort which was hired over the past decade."

 

[Saint Peter]

Petey thought his team was going to win the Superbowl this year too...



Reality is a harsh mistress.

I never said that. The greatest QB of all time retired and left a vacuum. Writing was on the wall.

Those people who keep crowing about the greatness of Obama have still not grasped the totality of his political defeat even as he angles in his last days for the UN "President of the World" post...

Obama bad!

We get it.