one woman and twenty men decide for all women in the USA

It's far from all that I "got," but it all I'm willing to expend in contemptuous dismissal.

All you have is incoherent (often manufactured) outrage & contemptuous dismissal.

In the four years I've interacted on the Lit forums, I've yet to see you produce anything else.

To be fair, most of the threads you've started are C&P and so not interesting enough to bother. Of course, neither are your so-called contributions to other people's threads.

The only value you seem to bring is some comedic amusement from reading your responses in which you consistently fail, fall back into ad hominem attacks, then finally run away. I mean strategically advance to the rear.
 
Questionable. We fags get a lot of hate in the name of 'family' too.

Also... that whole story is fucked up. I'm so sorry. I feel like I should ask if you're ok, but then I worry that that's condescending, so I'm just going to ramble awkwardly until I can figure out how to stop typing and hope that you get the gist of the emotional support that I'm trying to convey.

Well, the thread was about women's repro health. At least the states are legislating for gay marriage. Not that I'm saying that LGBT issues are a non-issue, or that the GOP isn't using LGBT as part of their "family values" platform. And I hear you about the hate. As some of the comments show, women's repro rights and gay rights are still considered something to ridicule and be contemptuous about. Because the old white men still think their opinions are the only ones that matter.

I don't need any emotional support. The stillbirth was 32 years ago. It's almost like it happened to someone else. It's just part of why I feel so strongly about women's reproductive rights. I do appreciate your empathy though.

:rose:
 
Maybe women should run for office and elect other women to make these calls.

Oh wait....they would rather not....and even when they do other women don't vote for them. So it seems they would leave it up to guys and just bitch about it instead.

You elect male religious whack jobs to office on the right and male inverts on the left...you do it to yourselves so STFU and own that shit with pride.
 
Maybe women should run for office and elect other women to make these calls.

Oh wait....they would rather not....and even when they do other women don't vote for them. So it seems they would leave it up to guys and just bitch about it instead.

You elect male religious whack jobs to office on the right and male inverts on the left...you do it to yourselves so STFU and own that shit with pride.

I don't vote for these religious whack jobs. You seem to think women who don't like these nut jobs voted for them. And you wonder why no one wants to argue with you. Geez.
 
Well, the thread was about women's repro health. At least the states are legislating for gay marriage. Not that I'm saying that LGBT issues are a non-issue, or that the GOP isn't using LGBT as part of their "family values" platform. And I hear you about the hate. As some of the comments show, women's repro rights and gay rights are still considered something to ridicule and be contemptuous about. Because the old white men still think their opinions are the only ones that matter.

I don't need any emotional support. The stillbirth was 32 years ago. It's almost like it happened to someone else. It's just part of why I feel so strongly about women's reproductive rights. I do appreciate your empathy though.

:rose:

On both the issues I kinda just wish they would name it something else. The "family" title is weird. Maybe use "morality" or something? I mean that's not great but it's better.

I'm glad that you're ok.
 
On both the issues I kinda just wish they would name it something else. The "family" title is weird. Maybe use "morality" or something? I mean that's not great but it's better.

I'm glad that you're ok.

It's about labeling the product to make it more consumer (i.e. voter) friendly.
 
I don't vote for these religious whack jobs.

Someone did!! IF it were really that big of an issue these dick bags wouldn't be in office doing the things they are doing. They would be fucking fired.

You seem to think women who don't like these nut jobs voted for them.

No I seem to think women who don't like these nut jobs didn't vote for someone else better. There is a difference between actively supporting shit stains and just standing by and letting it happen. IF these scum bags really were unanimously shitting in womens post toasties as you claim then those it conserns need to get together, FIRE that mother fucker and elect someone that better represents their interest. That's how shit works in this society.....

If all women got out there and voted for other women? It would be a 100% US government take over...the only penises left would be generals, supreme court justices, peons and coffee bitches. If just 1/2 of all women got out and voted for other women it might not be a 100% take over but you would fucking slaughter in the elections.

That is to say WOMEN HAVE THE FUCKIN' POWER TO CHANGE IT....but they don't so they can stfu with their "I'm such a victim of my vagina because I elected men to call the shots." bullshit. Because it's bullshit, if it's not bullshit then these folks won't survive the next election. There will be a female takeover of the USG, you can come back on the GB snap it off in my ass and I'll tell you I was wrong as fuck as it apparently was THAT a big deal. But I bet if any of them give up their seat it will take a lot more heat than this and most if not all stay right where they are at because the women of Kansas, B'ama and other hillbilly shit holes all across the bible belt love these nutty fuckers and wouldn't vote for a woman if you paid them, that's tew Pee Cee liburhul.

And you wonder why no one wants to argue with you. Geez.

I do???:confused: Since when?
 
Last edited:
The woman appeared to be between 20 and 25 at the time of her death, which may have been caused by the unusual arrangement of her twins when she tried to deliver them.

One of the babies was in an incomplete breech, or feet down, while the other was in a normal head-down, or vertex, position. Even today, this happens in only 20 percent of all twin deliveries and is considered to be high-risk, the researchers wrote in Antiquity.

The twins may have been locked together, or one might have had its head trapped in the birth canal. As a result, "all three individuals appear to have died together from complications associated with childbirth," the researchers wrote.


Here we are, living in the year 2015, and the Republicans are happy to rip away coverage for prenatal care.

This tragic triple death happened 8,000 years ago.

Why should that kind of suffering and tragedy, happen today, in this day and age ?

http://www.livescience.com/49680-siberia-grave-mother-twins.html
 
Men, who do not understand anything about the medical conditions of women, are deciding what women can, and cannot do for their health and well being.

MONDAY, FEB 23, 2015

Republican Rep. Vito Barbieri asked if a woman can swallow a small camera for doctors to conduct a remote gynecological exam.

Barbieri sits on the board of a crisis pregnancy center in northern Idaho.

Barbieri: You mentioned the risk of colonoscopy. Can that be done by drugs?
Madsen: Mr. Chairman, Rep. Barbieri, it cannot be done by drugs. It can, however, be done remotely, where you swallow a pill, and this pill has a little camera, and it makes its way through your intestines, and those images are uploaded to a doctor who's often thousands of miles away, who then interprets that.

Barbieri: Follow up, Mr. Chairman.

Chair: Rep. Barbieri.

Barbieri: Can this same procedure then be done in a pregnancy? Swallowing a camera and helping the doctor determine what the situation is, with the ...

Dr. Madsen: Mr. Chairman and Representative, it cannot be done in pregnancy simply because when you swallow a pill, it would not end up in the vagina.

[laughter]

Barbieri: Fascinating! That certainly makes sense, doctor.

*gsgs comment_What are these well informed men making a decision about ?*

"Physician Physical Presence and Women Protection Act" -
A bill that would ban doctors from prescribing abortion-inducing medication through telemedicine.
 
Men, who do not understand anything about the medical conditions of women, are deciding what women can, and cannot do for their health and well being.

Sounds like women should get out and vote more......but they wont!!!
 
State Representative Vito Barbieri

"Retired attorney, practicing in California for 20 years. Incumbent state representative. Barbieri owns a catering business and the “Vap-It” electronic cigarette store in Post Falls. In his two terms in the House, he’s been an outspoken tea party supporter and opponent of Medicaid expansion and civil rights protections for gays. Barbieri is board chairman of the Open Arms crisis pregnancy center and clinic in Coeur d’Alene. A home-schooling advocate, he’s called on Christians to pull their children out of Idaho’s “Godless” public schools."

Vito Barbieri is defending a statement posted on his re-election campaign website in which he called on Christians to pull their children out of Idaho’s “Godless” public schools.

In a debate on TV Channel 19 between Barbieri, R-Dalton Gardens, and his Democratic challenger Cheryl Stransky, also from Dalton Gardens, Barbieri was asked about this statement posted on his website regarding public schools: “One more thing: If you accept Jesus Christ as Lord and God, then pull your kids out of that Godless institution.”

Barbieri told questioners from the Coeur Group that he stands by the statement. “My words exactly,” he said.


What Rep. Vito Barbieri wants-

Under HB154, abortion-inducing medication could not be administered through telemedicine —which does not currently happen in Idaho— and requires doctors to make "all reasonable efforts" to schedule a follow-up visit.
The bill is backed by the anti-abortion group Idaho Choose Life.

What Rep. Barber's had to say, after his remark was noticed-

"I was being rhetorical, because I was trying to make the point that equalizing a colonoscopy to this particular procedure (abortion) was apples and oranges,” he said. “So I was asking a rhetorical question that was designed to make her say that they weren’t the same thing, and she did so. It was the response I wanted.”

"This isn’t the first time Idaho lawmakers have drawn attention while debating abortion legislation."

"In 2013, Republican Rep. Ron Mendive of Coeur d’Alene drew audible gasps in a committee when he asked if the American Civil Liberties Union-Idaho’s pro-abortion stance also meant they supported prostitution. A year prior, Republican Sen. Chuck Winder of Boise drew national criticism after he suggested on the Senate floor that a doctor should ask a woman who says she was raped if her pregnancy could have been caused by “normal relations in a marriage."

http://m.spokesman.com/stories/2015/feb/23/idaho-reps-question-abortion-bill-draws-national-a/
 
Back
Top