LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Ooops, Racist Democrat Didn't Get The Memo To Join Republican Party

Contemporary leftists, on the other hand, view their opponents as people you send off to the Gulag, unworthy of any respect, deserving of any kind of low blow, no matter how foul. So you accuse Goldwater of insanity, slander Justice Thomas as a sexual monster, casually publish plays, books, and films calling for the assassination of President Bush, and assault the first serious Republican female candidate at her weakest point -- her family. And of course, you scream to high heaven if any form of turnabout occurs in your direction, as in the case of the Obama family, which was declared "off limits" early in the presidential campaign, at the same time that Palin's family was being stretched on the media rack.

This style of political loathing has become effectively innate. It has been systemized to such a degree as to become integral. Modern liberalism cannot do without it. An entire structure has been erected on the basis of political hatred, and from that structure a whole new strategy has arisen.
J.R. Dunn
 
Another good Democrat:

"There is an old saying, in the days of slavery. There were those slaves who lived on the plantation, and there were those slaves who lived in the house. You got the privilege of living in the house if you served the master, do exactly the way the master intended to have you serve him. That gave you privilege. Colin Powell is committed to come into the house of the master, as long as he would serve the master, according to the master’s purpose."
Harry Belafonte
 
Socialism, like the ancient ideas from which it springs, confuses the distinction between government and society. As a result of this, every time we object to a thing being done by government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all. We disapprove of state education. Then the socialists say that we are opposed to any education. We object to a state religion. Then the socialists say that we want no religion at all. We object to a state-enforced equality. Then they say that we are against equality. And so on, and so on. It is as if the socialists were to accuse us of not wanting persons to eat because we do not want the state to raise grain.
Frédéric Bastiat
 
“Let’s say somebody were [in the White House] and they wanted to destroy this nation, I would create division among the people, encourage a culture of ridicule for basic morality and the principles that made and sustained the country, undermine the financial stability of the nation, and weaken and destroy the military. It appears coincidentally that those are the very things that are happening right now.”
Dr. Ben Carson
 
Dances With Falsehoods said:
“Let’s say somebody were [in the White House] and they wanted to destroy this nation, I would create division among the people, encourage a culture of ridicule for basic morality and the principles that made and sustained the country, undermine the financial stability of the nation, and weaken and destroy the military. It appears coincidentally that those are the very things that are happening right now.”
Dr. Ben Carson
Click to expand...

I'm glad you've finally found a quotable token Negro to replace Herman Cain. I was concerned that you might have to fall back on Thomas Sowell again. Carson is a much more effective scold.
 
"Just think, if AJ's birthsquaw had delivered him in Tennessee or North Carolina, he'd be a bastard."
ThrobDownSouth, this morning...

This is how they all think, even if they restrain themselves.

None of them put him on ignore and they all treat him like he is a rational person because he holds the same beliefs as self-evident.

"Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche

If you quietly accept and go along no matter what your feelings are, ultimately you internalize what you're saying, because it's too hard to believe one thing and say another. I can see it very strikingly in my own background. Go to any elite university and you are usually speaking to very disciplined people, people who have been selected for obedience.
Noam Chomsky
 
Mitt Romney's disappointing 2012 defeat has unleashed an orgy of GOP self-reflection aimed at winning in 2016. Alas, nearly everything entails "outreach" and "inclusion" to assorted minority groups plus ending the alleged Republican "war on women." Disbelievers should enter "GOP pandering" into Google--1.6 million hits as of March 24th.

But of all this pandering, the most important is the official100 page Growth and Opportunity Project issued by the Republican National Committee Chairman and its chair Reince Priebus. RNC researchers spoke with some 2,600 people both inside and outside of Washington, lots of voters, technical experts, party members and elected officials, an assortment of pollsters, some 600 Hispanic voters and former Republican voters who thought the party was either too little or too conservative. Some 36,000 people also contributed their thoughts online.

...

So, why the Report's glaring omission? Let me suggest that appealing to whites as "an ethnic group" is now taboo, and the prohibition exists regardless of the appeal's economic allure or similarity to appeals made to other demographic groups.. Such electoral rhetoric automatically certifies the advocate as racist, a nutcase, xenophobic and, worst of all, hateful.
Click to expand...
Robert Weissberg
http://www.americanthinker.com/2013...at_dare_not_speak_its_name.html#ixzz2OpYzCaYv

Oikophobia

Xenophobia is fear of the alien; oikophobia is fear of the familiar: "the disposition, in any conflict, to side with 'them' against 'us', and the felt need to denigrate the customs, culture and institutions that are identifiably 'ours.' "

The oik repudiates national loyalties and defines his goals and ideals against the nation, promoting transnational institutions over national governments, accepting and endorsing laws that are imposed on us from on high by the EU or the UN, though without troubling to consider Terence's question, and defining his political vision in terms of universal values that have been purified of all reference to the particular attachments of a real historical community.
The oik is, in his own eyes, a defender of enlightened universalism against local chauvinism. And it is the rise of the oik that has led to the growing crisis of legitimacy in the nation states of Europe. For we are seeing a massive expansion of the legislative burden on the people of Europe, and a relentless assault on the only loyalties that would enable them voluntarily to bear it. The explosive effect of this has already been felt in Holland and France. It will be felt soon everywhere, and the result may not be what the oiks expect.
Roger Scruton, British philosopher
 
4est_4est_Gump said:
There it is again. Condoning a poster who just used a racist slur, because squaw is, I guess, okay, because it is a small word from a small mind...
Click to expand...

Ok. Totally unaware squaw is a racist term. I am not condoning anything, mate.

I think you're just trying to change focus here.
 
the_kuntess said:
Ok. Totally unaware squaw is a racist term. I am not condoning anything, mate.

I think you're just trying to change focus here.
Click to expand...

No, I am still working on the same point, the one being implied by vette. If a Republican had said that, thee would be 15 threads on page one of shocked outrage and gleeful victory dances that once again, we have absolute proof of racism.

But because it is a Democrat, nothing was going to be said, and if anything is said, then it is because Republicans are racists and the proof is that they do not have the empathy to understand why a black man would speak in such a manner.

This, then is what affirmative-action and most debate has come down to; because we are Democrats, we always fight for what is right and against anyone who does not believe in right, you can say, or do, anything you want to them.

And Throb's posse proves that on a daily basis.

They condone this sort of language and will not condemn it, but instead they will go on the attack against anybody who dares to even notice it.
 
4est_4est_Gump said:
No, I am still working on the same point, the one being implied by vette. If a Republican had said that, thee would be 15 threads on page one of shocked outrage and gleeful victory dances that once again, we have absolute proof of racism.

But because it is a Democrat, nothing was going to be said, and if anything is said, then it is because Republicans are racists and the proof is that they do not have the empathy to understand why a black man would speak in such a manner.

This, then is what affirmative-action and most debate has come down to; because we are Democrats, we always fight for what is right and against anyone who does not believe in right, you can say, or do, anything you want to them.

And Throb's posse proves that on a daily basis.

They condone this sort of language and will not condemn it, but instead they will go on the attack against anybody who dares to even notice it.
Click to expand...


People generally don't give a fuck about unknown state reps around here. The fact is shitloads of Republican state reps say racist and sexist things but it's not newsworthy.
 
4est_4est_Gump said:
That is exactly how they would reply.

Not the content of what is posted, but the source.
Click to expand...

I have examined and read AT several times and my comment relates to the fact it is NOT an impartial source of information. It has an agenda and it publishes only information that helps advance that agenda.
 
Huh.

A black man says something vile and racist.

And a democrat, to boot.

Not the first time, won't be the last.

It's offensive. And wrong.

It's just as despicable as the stuff Busybody posts. Amicus, too.

I wonder when Vette will make threads about that?
 
4est_4est_Gump said:
http://c9.nrostatic.com/uploaded/pic_giant_121812_C.jpg
When do merc, UD, zip and Petey start high-fiving him?
Backslaps and guffaws all around for their big debate win...
Click to expand...

When I condemned Rob for making racist comments about your daughter, you got mad at me and said you didn't want me defending you.

So clearly you are aware that I totally rebuked him (and have continued to do so) about going after your family and making racist comments about them.

Which makes this post nothing more than a hpyocritical personal attack against me.

You and Rob are both hypocritical racists. How ironic. :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Rightguide
The Democrat Party Is Dead Forever?
Replies
16
Views
455
ll74
ll74
Rightguide
The Democrat Party Is A Domestic Terrorist Organization
2 3
Replies
51
Views
963
Hel_Books
H
Rightguide
70% Of Americans Think The Democrat Party Is Out Of Touch
3 4 5
Replies
113
Views
1K
briancamdudetenger2018
B
Rightguide
Republicans Move To Impeach Judge Boasberg
2 3
Replies
52
Views
778
HisArpy
HisArpy
Rightguide
Who Is left For The Democrat Party To Represent?
Replies
20
Views
405
YDB95
YDB95
Back
Top