jomar
chillin
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2006
- Posts
- 27,845
I don’t watch international play, but was surprised how much the refs let them play at the Olympics. Rugby came to mind.The foreign players / teams have some built in advantages:
1) They are the hunters, the U.S. teams are the hunted. (And foreign players seem to play extra aggressively against the U.S., and international refs seem to allow it.)
As a general rule I don’t doubt you’re right. And it makes sense.2) The American professionals are generally the top stars, so they always seem to be more risk averse in international games. (I don’t see the all out effort, which is related to my first point: There is a very real risk of an injury that could end a career.)
I was impressed that Diana Taurasi sat the final final out without protest knowing the US needed its best on the court.3) As you mentioned, the foreign players have more time to “gel”, but they are ALSO more open to “gelling “ (imho) than the American stars. There is undoubtably more ego management on Team USA than on the foreign teams. (See: Jayson Tatum, etc.)
Yes4) FIBA rules and refereeing are waaaaay different than the NBA / WNBA. They even use a different ball. (I would definitely like to see the FIBA rules, reffing, court size, and ball mirror the NBA /WNBA , but that isn’t going to happen.)
Ultimately, the talent gap is closing while the standard disadvantages the U.S. teams have to deal with remain intact.
It is what it is.
![]()