Pete B for the win :)

Or living rent-free in the heads of homophobes everywhere.

Yes. I hope Pete enjoys the angst he causes all those homophobes who so richly deserve to suffer over his success and well-grounded life.
 
Yes. I hope Pete enjoys the angst he causes all those homophobes who so richly deserve to suffer over his success and well-grounded life.

The funny thing is, he didn't impress me at all when he ran for president (although I could've done without Sen Klobuchar making it her personal mission to destroy him), and I didn't think he'd particularly earned a cabinet spot. But I've had no complaints about the job he's done there, and I can't help but love knowing what he does to the deplorables just by virtue of being there.
 
https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/news/f...sedgntp&cvid=1b818e1c2029470faf73f0e76a897a9a

Pete's husband, Chasten, posted a tongue-in-cheek tweet about kavanaugh's meal being interrupted by protestors... Fox host questioned Pete about it:
The transportation secretary responded that public officials “should always be free from violence, harassment and intimidation,” but “you’re never going to be free from criticism or peaceful protest, people exercising their First Amendment rights.

That’s what happened in this case,” Buttigieg continued. “Remember, the justice never even came into contact with these protesters. Reportedly didn’t see or hear them, and these protesters are upset because a right, an important right that the majority of Americans support, was taken away.

Buttigieg continued to defend abortion activists over their right to peacefully protest, but Emanuel managed to get back to questioning him, asking “are you comfortable with protesters protesting when you and your husband go to dinner at a restaurant?”
“Protesting peacefully outside in a public space? Sure,” Buttigieg answered. “I can’t even tell you the number of spaces, venues, and scenarios where I’ve been protested and in the bottom line is this: any public figure should always always be free from violence, intimidation and harassment, but should never be free from criticism or people exercising their First Amendment rights.”
👏🤝☝️
 
In Canada, if you want to protest a Judge or a Court’s decision, you do it at their workplace.

Go to their house or pay people to harass them in public?… you will wind up in jail.

I like our system better.
 
In Canada, if you want to protest a Judge or a Court’s decision, you do it at their workplace.

Go to their house or pay people to harass them in public?… you will wind up in jail.

I like our system better.

A time honored way of registering your disagreement with the government is by voting, and Kavanaugh has signed on to decisions that will make it harder to do just that (leaving aside his work on behalf of the second-place vote-getter in 2000).

So his hurt feelings don't matter much to me. And unlike Canada, we have a First Amendment.
 
A time honored way of registering your disagreement with the government is by voting, and Kavanaugh has signed on to decisions that will make it harder to do just that (leaving aside his work on behalf of the second-place vote-getter in 2000).

So his hurt feelings don't matter much to me. And unlike Canada, we have a First Amendment.

Using the first amendment as a means to harass people in their private lives seems contrary to the notion of America to me.
 
Back
Top