EmilyMiller
May be triggering
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2022
- Posts
- 18,634
This is the genesis of what became my novel. It’s a PM I sent to @Djmac1031 on Nov 13th 2024.
Nov 13, 2024
Two hundred years in the future…
Guy’s wife dies. He has an android created in her likeness, but a partly organic android based on her DNA. He knows it’s messed up, but he is grief stricken and it’s the only way he can see to cope. Then the android starts to have memories.
—
This is typical of my initial ideas. I developed it a bit further and wrote an intro, which is like 90% the same in the finished work. But then I realized that it needed some purpose and and ending. So I focused on that.
I wrote an initial version of the ending early on. Then my challenge was how to get from A to Z in a way that made sense and in which the events and actions of the protagonists were consistent with the world they inhabited and their natures.
I did this by writing a [kinda long] outline. Now I didn’t foresee everything. At times I realized that I needed to deviate from the outline. At times I figured out that in order for X to happen, I needed Y and Z to happen first, which meant adding a new section to the outline.
But, beyond these inevitable meanderings, I stuck to my purpose and to joining the narrative up with my pre-written ending (which I also revised as I wrote).
To me, this is a hybrid approach. I don’t plan every detail, but I do have a plan. I don’t slavishly stick to my initial plan, I adapt it as I see fit. But I always have a structure I’m working within. At no point (save before I envisaged the ending and then wrote the outline) was I in a position where, “I have no clue where this is going, let’s just write.”
I’d say maybe 75% plotter and 25% pantser. Then that might be different for another story, but I’m never 100% either extreme.
Like I’m writing a story with the lovely @PennyThompson at present which has much more pantser qualities (at present). But I’m already scoping out the ending and plot with her.
Nov 13, 2024
Two hundred years in the future…
Guy’s wife dies. He has an android created in her likeness, but a partly organic android based on her DNA. He knows it’s messed up, but he is grief stricken and it’s the only way he can see to cope. Then the android starts to have memories.
—
This is typical of my initial ideas. I developed it a bit further and wrote an intro, which is like 90% the same in the finished work. But then I realized that it needed some purpose and and ending. So I focused on that.
I wrote an initial version of the ending early on. Then my challenge was how to get from A to Z in a way that made sense and in which the events and actions of the protagonists were consistent with the world they inhabited and their natures.
I did this by writing a [kinda long] outline. Now I didn’t foresee everything. At times I realized that I needed to deviate from the outline. At times I figured out that in order for X to happen, I needed Y and Z to happen first, which meant adding a new section to the outline.
But, beyond these inevitable meanderings, I stuck to my purpose and to joining the narrative up with my pre-written ending (which I also revised as I wrote).
To me, this is a hybrid approach. I don’t plan every detail, but I do have a plan. I don’t slavishly stick to my initial plan, I adapt it as I see fit. But I always have a structure I’m working within. At no point (save before I envisaged the ending and then wrote the outline) was I in a position where, “I have no clue where this is going, let’s just write.”
I’d say maybe 75% plotter and 25% pantser. Then that might be different for another story, but I’m never 100% either extreme.
Like I’m writing a story with the lovely @PennyThompson at present which has much more pantser qualities (at present). But I’m already scoping out the ending and plot with her.
Last edited:


