U
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In the spirit of full disclosure, you might have mentioned this "fuck buddy" is a high ranking military officer with a top secret security classification.
In the case of both officers, political decisions were made in their behalf in light of their sacrifices over many years. Both however are discredited, both had their government records and careers tarnished and destroyed. I don't think we'll see Petraeus busted down to a private, or suffer confinement. I don't think the American people will stand for that before we know the nature of that alleged classified material and what exactly it compromised.
Is that even possible in real life? I've never heard in real life of anybody being being busted from officer down to enlisted.
Just having a Top Secret doesn't mean that you are allowed access to all Top Secret information. That information is distributed on a "need to know" basis. She didn't.
I carried a Top Secret security clearance with CTSA (Cosmic Top Secret Atomal) access while doing cryptography work for the Pershing II missiles in the Army (I was in the Platoon Control Center and was responsible for half of the access codes for the warhead and Guidance system targeting data, the Captain in charge of the platoon had access to the other half). Despite my clearance and access I still wouldn't be allowed access to just any Top Secret information.
Had I shared MY Top Secret information with the Captain even with his identical security clearance my ass would have been in the fire. He wasn't authorized access to that particular information just as I wasn't authorized access to his.
Love and sex, trumps common sense, it seems. There are strict procedures for the transport or transmittal of highly classified material. He could have been authorized to be in possession of it himself, but my understanding is it might have been on an unsecured personal computer, which would be a violation of handling procedures.
The general has denied giving Paula Broadwell classified material, so the government must be asking how she could have been in possession of certain materials, and I suspect they already know the answer to that question.
My personal opinion is, it remains to be seen what the general did, or did not do. I highly suspect that politics are at the bottom of this affair. It may have to go to trial before we know the real truth, or whether or not the government is just trying to keep in in line or reasons yet unknown.
Just having a Top Secret doesn't mean that you are allowed access to all Top Secret information. That information is distributed on a "need to know" basis. She didn't.
I carried a Top Secret security clearance with CTSA (Cosmic Top Secret Atomal) access while doing cryptography work for the Pershing II missiles in the Army (I was in the Platoon Control Center and was responsible for half of the access codes for the warhead and Guidance system targeting data, the Captain in charge of the platoon had access to the other half). Despite my clearance and access I still wouldn't be allowed access to just any Top Secret information.
Had I shared MY Top Secret information with the Captain even with his identical security clearance my ass would have been in the fire. He wasn't authorized access to that particular information just as I wasn't authorized access to his.
#AscriptionAgain
How that platinum health care policy of yours, buddy?![]()
It's a court martial offense if he did it on active duty.
Which is why I think it pretty interesting of a human interest story that a guy who, by all accounts exhibited a strong sense of honor and duty in all the other things we know about him, would do this.
It points to how difficult it can be to do the right thing and not give in to temptation. I never liked the whole, "my wife doesn't understand me, or, I am not getting my needs met excuse, but by all accounts his marriage was a pretty happy and fulfilling one, he is a man of otherwise unassailable character, and even he does this.
Why after all this time has passed.
This is a long investigation or convenient...
Which is why I think it pretty interesting of a human interest story that a guy who, by all accounts exhibited a strong sense of honor and duty in all the other things we know about him, would do this.
It points to how difficult it can be to do the right thing and not give in to temptation. I never liked the whole, "my wife doesn't understand me, or, I am not getting my needs met excuse, but by all accounts his marriage was a pretty happy and fulfilling one, he is a man of otherwise unassailable character, and even he does this.
My point was if this particular man could fall, anyone given the opportunity and enough alone time will most likely fall.
I think those that haven't either have not ever truly had the opportunity and the desire cross in a situation where they had the reasonable belief they would not get caught, or they are people of such high moral fiber that they avoid being in situations where they would have such an opportunity.
I have been both of those things. Sometimes I would have if I could have, but it just wasn't likely, or I definitely could have and had to erect artificial barriers. To my shame and regret I found myself with opportunity and desire once very early on and salvaged a little dignity by not consummating it, but it went way too far. It was a wake up call that I never wanted to repeat.
I think the decision not to cheat has to take place before there is an opportunity, and one has to work at making sure there are not any easy opportunities.
It might be easier for ugly people, I will allow.
No not at all. What are we to take away from the FACT that the government has been dragging its feet for two years in bringing charges against the General. It's being reported that it is up to Eric Holder whether or not to prosecute Petraeus. This indicates politics to me.
The Army can prosecute him and should if there is evidence to do so. He was a 4 star general officer in the United States Army, and can be recalled for prosecution by court martial. This prosecution should be tried by the Army and appealed to an article III court if need be.
Smacks of politics. The leak may have been intended to intimidate Petraeus.
Berger had a two-year jail sentence. Fuck you.Berger should have done hard time for that little event.
It might not have been so, if he hadn't already fired nine general officers running up to this event. There is a pattern there.

More vetteman claims to debunk.It might not have been so, if he hadn't already fired nine general officers running up to this event. There is a pattern there.
There's nine. Where's the pattern?Major General Michael Carey – As commander of the US land-based nuclear missile program, Carey was responsible for three units of ICBMs. He was relieved in October 2013 for his conduct on a July trip to Moscow, where he went on what news reports called a “drunken bender,” fraternized with local women and made inappropriate comments disparaging the Russian military. As a result, he was reassigned and made Special Assistant to the Commander of Air Force Space Command in Colorado.
Vice Admiral Tim Giardina – Giardina served as chief of staff of the US Pacific Fleet and was the number 2 officer of US Strategic Command (StratCom) until being relieved of duty in September 2013, following an investigation into his use of fake casino chips in a poker game. This is a class D felony in Iowa, where StratCom is located. He was already due to leave StratCom, and his bio currently lists him as “assigned to the staff of the vice chief of naval operations.”
Lieutenant General David Holmes Huntoon, Jr. – Huntoon was serving as the Superintendent of the United States Military Academy in West Point until June 2013, when a report of an Inspector General’s office investigation was released, which found that he had misused his position and forced subordinate officers to perform personal tasks. Huntoon was given a letter of reprimand, allowed to resign from his post and took his mandatory retirement the next month.
Major General C.M.M. Gurganus – This was one of two generals asked to retire early by the Commandant of the Marine Corps after a September 2012 Taliban surprise attack on a Marine airbase. Gurganus was found to have “not taken adequate force protection measures” at Camp Bastion, which led to the death of two Marines and the destruction of six Harrier jet fighters.
Major General Gregg A. Sturdevant – Sturdevant was the other general asked to retire in the wake of the Camp Bastion attack.
Brigadier General Bryan Roberts – The former commanding officer of Fort Jackson, the largest training post in the US Army, Roberts was suspended in May 2013 after an investigation into adultery and a physical altercation with a woman described as his mistress. Adultery in the military is punishable as an action that can bring discredit upon the armed forces.
Major General Ralph Baker – Baker was removed from his post as commanding officer of Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa, as well as fined, after an administrative hearing into alcohol abuse and sexual misconduct charges in April 2013.
Rear Admiral Charles Gaouette – Gaouette held the position of commanding officer of Carrier Strike Group Three until a reprimand from the US Navy led to his removal. He was found to have used profanity in public and made several racially insensitive remarks. The origin of the complaint might have come from the captain of the aircraft carrier assigned to the Strike Group, who alleged Gaouette had humiliated him in public.
General Carter F. Ham – The commander of US Command Africa, Ham retired in the wake of the September 2011 attack on the US consulate in Benghazi, Libya. Though the attack itself generated enormous controversy and blame on the Obama administration, Ham himself was never reprimanded and served the entirety of his two-year posting in Africa, retiring as scheduled at age 62, after a 40 year career.