Put Your Cards on the Table, Joe Kent

  1. He promised to get us out of Afghanistan in his first term. Instead he made a deal with the Taliban and didn’t remove our troops.
  2. Promised no more foreign intervention or regime change attempts. Instead he’s attacked 7 nations and botched regime change attempts in Venezuela and Iran.
  3. Promised a “golden age” for the US economy. Instead the 2025 economy performed worse in every way than 2024.
  4. Promised to slash the deficit. Instead his Tax & Spend Bill is adding $4 trillion to the deficit projections.
Rewrite is right! No rite the truth. Not your triggered bullshit
 
Zero invaders over the boarder. We did not need a wall, we needed a President.
There are still plenty of border crossings, but that's beside the point. The point is, you asked for examples of promises Trump did not deliver on. He said he would put up a wall and Mexico would pay for it. Neither one happened, period. Whether we needed it or not doesn't matter.
All attempts to repair or eliminate the obama /pelosi health care massacre have been sued or voted against in the house.
He said he would replace it with something much better, and a decade later the closest he's come to any specifics is claiming to have "concepts of a plan".
Yeah. Sad that Ukraine thing. Even Trump can't over come the pussy capitulation of the EU, which is near invaded. Why do you think we want out of NATO!
Ukraine in't a NATO member, and again, it's not a question of whether he tried and failed, it's a question of whether he did what he said he would do. He said he'd put an end to the war the day after the election. As you know, he made no effort to do that.
 
There are still plenty of border crossings, but that's beside the point. The point is, you asked for examples of promises Trump did not deliver on. He said he would put up a wall and Mexico would pay for it. Neither one happened, period. Whether we needed it or not doesn't matter.

He said he would replace it with something much better, and a decade later the closest he's come to any specifics is claiming to have "concepts of a plan".

Ukraine in't a NATO member, and again, it's not a question of whether he tried and failed, it's a question of whether he did what he said he would do. He said he'd put an end to the war the day after the election. As you know, he made no effort to do that.
Just a quickie...Mexico paid for the wall 50 times over already! Remember those nasty little things called tarrifs? You watch what happens with Mexico. We just may end up with the whole damn country. They need to pay up for our military and special forces, and they cant let the cartels come back and take them over again, and they have no way of protecting themselves, as dont these other countries, Columbia,Venezuela, Cuba etc, so we will do it. FOR A PRICE! Go ahead with clean and fair elections, and run your country with no corruption. But we want rights to your land.And we will protect you militarily.Cheers
 
Last edited:
In a forum full of partisans, you truly take it to a new level.
Again LISTEN TO TRUMP! 2 WEEKS AGO HESAID..." if a country cant protect themselves they shouldn't own the land. We will protect them in return for land rights" That NOT my plan! Even tho It looks like to me, he setting himself up to be The King of the Western Hemisphere. But that part is just me, of course.😊
 
There are still plenty of border crossings, but that's beside the point. The point is, you asked for examples of promises Trump did not deliver on. He said he would put up a wall and Mexico would pay for it. Neither one happened, period. Whether we needed it or not doesn't matter.

He said he would replace it with something much better, and a decade later the closest he's come to any specifics is claiming to have "concepts of a plan".

Ukraine in't a NATO member, and again, it's not a question of whether he tried and failed, it's a question of whether he did what he said he would do. He said he'd put an end to the war the day after the election. As you know, he made no effort to do that.

I also seem to remember something about "GROCERIES!!!", and DonOld promising that EVERYTHING would cost WAY LESS.

And NOT just lower inflation (which also hasn’t happened), but WAY LOWER PRICES for EVERYTHING…

😑

Oh yeah: DonOld also promised that tariffs would pay for everything AND make America rich…

😑

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
 
Just a quickie...Mexico paid for the wall 50 times over already! Remember those nasty little things called tarrifs? You watch what happens with Mexico. We just may end up with the whole damn country. They need to pay up for our military and special forces, and they cant let the cartels come back and take them over again, and they have no way of protecting themselves, as dont these other countries, Columbia,Venezuela, Cuba etc, so we will do it. FOR A PRICE! Go ahead with clean and fair elections, and run your country with no corruption. But we want rights to your land.And we will protect you militarily.Cheers

Mexico does not, nor any other country, pay US tariffs. They are paid by US businesses and/or US consumers.
 
So Kent was known to be a leaker.....was actually blocked from Intel briefings because of his leaking and somehow was not fired.

Retcon, aisle 1.
It also has been divulged that the FBI opened an investigation into his potential leaking about the time he was barred from the briefings which was weeks before his resignation letter.
 
It also has been divulged that the FBI opened an investigation into his potential leaking about the time he was barred from the briefings which was weeks before his resignation letter.
Sounds like a great hire by dear leader 👍

I remember back when leakers were a top priority for the administration and would not be hired.
 
Oh for Christ's sake, grow the fuck up.
Incompetence is what I'm describing here.

If you say your priority is getting rid of leakers and you hire someone that is a known leaker, that is incompetence.

Is that a childish perspective? Or should adults expect that an administration does what they say they will do?
 
Incompetence is what I'm describing here.

If you say your priority is getting rid of leakers and you hire someone that is a known leaker, that is incompetence.

Is that a childish perspective? Or should adults expect that an administration does what they say they will do?
You're an idiot.

A failed political operative was given a position in a lower tier element of the government. A directorate, and that is a liberal use of the word, that had NO powers, investigative or actionable. It was a clearing house that made recommendations. He fucking blew it.

Way too many politicians that live a delusional life.

Politician; "I know something you don't know."
The press; "Tell me and I'll be your friend."
Politician; "Oh, OK."

Too bad you just can't take them out and hang them, that would put an end to that shit.
 
You're an idiot.
Are you suggesting that hiring known leakers when you've told everyone that leakers are a top priority is competent behavior?

A failed political operative was given a position in a lower tier element of the government. A directorate, and that is a liberal use of the word, that had NO powers, investigative or actionable. It was a clearing house that made recommendations. He fucking blew it.
So you're fine hiring a known leader who is also known to be weak on security?

Way too many politicians that live a delusional life.

Politician; "I know something you don't know."
The press; "Tell me and I'll be your friend."
Politician; "Oh, OK."

Too bad you just can't take them out and hang them, that would put an end to that shit.
So it's the presses fault that the known leaker leaked to them?
¯⁠\⁠(⁠°⁠_⁠o⁠)⁠/⁠¯
 
He was given a chance and he blew it. Are you saying that in you knew he was going to leak before he was even confirmed? :rolleyes:
 
He was given a chance and he blew it. Are you saying that in you knew he was going to leak before he was even confirmed?
What part of "known leaker" is difficult for you to understand?
What part of "know to be weak on security" is difficult for you to understand?

If what they are saying is to be believed, then how do you describe the word, "known"? The word, as I have understood it, demonstrates a history.

Or is it just that he was nominated without proper background?
 
Apparently, Trump always knew Kent was weak on security which is obviously why Trump appointed Kent to *checks notes* head up a counterterrorism dept to safeguard US security. 👀
Keep your freinds close amd your enemies closer! Ever hear Trump say this? Of course you havent!
 
He was given a chance and he blew it. Are you saying that in you knew he was going to leak before he was even confirmed? :rolleyes:

Joe Kent was a known jackass and conspiracy lunatic before his confirmation. Trump appointed him anyway, because jackassery and conspiracy lunacy are regarded as positive traits in his administration.

Senator Murray Speaks Out Against Nomination of Radical, Unqualified Conspiracy Theorist Joe Kent Ahead of Confirmation Vote to Lead National Counterterrorism Center
 
Mexico does not, nor any other country, pay US tariffs. They are paid by US businesses and/or US consumers.
And youre a dumb ass like the rest of your party of perverts pedofiles and canibals. Go educate yourself.

. However, specific imports face targeted tariffs, including 50% on steel, aluminum, and copper, 25% on medium/heavy-duty trucks, and 17% on tomatoes. Mexico's overall effective tariff rate on exports to the U.S. is approximately
 
Last edited:
Back
Top