Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thoughts on D/s borrowed and revamped a bit...
A D/s relationship is just that…a relationship. Some people who practice D/s get off on having a bunch of rules and routines, but no matter what the format, the same basic ‘vanilla’ rules apply.
Dick pics or telling a potential sub that they must call you "Master" or "Sir" probably won't get you very far.
Kindness and the benefit of the doubt will go a long way. Just like in any other relationship.
Sex is fabulous, but sex alone isn’t a relationship.
Communicate, communicate, communicate. Say what you mean, and mean what you say.
Don’t stay with someone who makes you feel badly about yourself.
Consent is given freely without coercion. (And there should never be a ‘but’ or an ‘except’ after this one.)
Don’t say it’s okay if it’s not.
Bad days will happen. Don’t threaten to leave every time things are difficult.
Remember that sometimes you have to place harmony above your desire to be right.
When all else fails default to love.
Calling yourself a Dom, sub, Master, slave, or pet doesn’t change the basics of how relationships work. You are still two people who need to work out all of the usual stuff with each other.
Take her on a real date. Open her door. Compliment her on something other than how she looks. Her being submissive doesn’t mean basic chivalry goes out the window.
Don’t expect him to read your mind. If you want something communicate. Don’t assume that sex is the only thing he cares about.
Learn to love yourself so you can love and be loved fully. The bondage, ropes, kneeling, and rules come later. They are the structure that holds the relationship. If you have those things but don’t have anything to fill the space inside then the structure collapses.
also how you shouldn't try to do everything all at once. Pick a thing and do it. Then add one more thing to it.100%. You just forgot the part about how that’s all a lot harder than it sounds.
Wise words though.
You all have provided wonderful insight and information!!There is a lot of people who say subs that "top from the bottom" are "bad", yet I am one of these "subs" in past and would like to clarify why we top from the bottom and the type of man who likely will be our partners in what is still what I deem a quality functional BDSM relationship.
I am a dominant. Topping from the bottom is how I realized this, actually. Subs who top from the bottom are not submissives, at all, IMO. The dominant is actually the submissive.
Why did I identify as a submissive and assume dominant control with my partner?
- I felt that as a woman that the submissive role was likely what was expected and the role I had been conditioned to accept.
- My partner in this relationship needed to learn to be the dominant in many areas of life and become a leader but was inexperienced in this realm.
- My partner had a high pain threshold, when I was given consent to bind and whip him, he went to sub drop in 1 minute flat having a very bad ab reaction.
- I, on the other hand, intensely enjoyed the act of inflicting pain on someone a little too much and I became frightened that I would harm someone in this role.
(Also my enjoyment doing this as the dominant was not arrousing to me, sexually. This disturbed me, also.)
I provided him with what I call "the illusion of power", in this space his self esteem was able to flourish, he became more confident in himself, he realized his potential, over time he became more capable of being the dominant on his own.
I hoped that he could assume the leadership/dominant role in our relationship, at some point. I would need a switch/equal partner who can assume either, in reality, but during a time of true vulnerability (and any time I explicitly tried to give him control or my "true" submission in my life or in bed), our relationship would become volatile. He would have a nervous breakdown and lash out causing me to leave for my safety.
He would become overwhelmed with the responsibility of leadership, dominance and unable to mentally handle it. Unable to fully assume that role, we would return back to the power dynamic from before, things would be okay. Then I would give him control hoping he could lead/dom but the same thing would happen. Eventually it was going to have to end permanently.
He enjoyed satisfying and pleasing me, I allowed him to do so. He had low self esteem, grew up with a family of strong women who would manipulate and exploit him. He needed to learn to take charge. We had become well read on BDSM resources, the relationship was highly therapeutic for us both.
He, unfortunately, had never been in a dominant role and needed to for his sake and guiding him thru this was therapeutic and empowering for him. I had hoped he would become a good leader/dom or equal...but...eh.
Would I hold some guys hand thru it again? Probably not.
I am exploring embracing the control/dominance aspect and beginning to accept that I wasn't a sub in the first place but don't mind being one if needed. Would prefer future partners to have experience in that realm or at the least, lead the relationship and not buckle from the pressure when they are in control.
Are you talking about online or in person or doesn't it matter for this conversation?
When you say "fictional" - do you mean more of a cliche version of bdsm? Because what you describe - issuing edicts/orders via messaging - is truthful for some folks. When I first started exploring bdsm, it was all online. I experienced that type of communication: "twist your nipples five times to the right, slut" and I loved it. Now, not so much but at the time it worked. I learned a lot about what I liked, didn't like, testing limits, etc.
For me, a D/s relationrship is about possession and rough sex. I super dig that stuff. Not always but sometimes.
I learned a valuable lesson here about topping from the bottom. Some D types like bratty s types. That's not the lesson - what I learned from others here is that often times topping from the bottom is confused for a submissive voicing what he / she needs or desires.
An effective D/s relationship is just an effective relationship. Whatever works for the people involved = effective.
There is a lot of people who say subs that "top from the bottom" are "bad", yet I am one of these "subs" in past and would like to clarify why we top from the bottom and the type of man who likely will be our partners in what is still what I deem a quality functional BDSM relationship.
I am a dominant. Topping from the bottom is how I realized this, actually. Subs who top from the bottom are not submissives, at all, IMO. The dominant is actually the submissive.
Why did I identify as a submissive and assume dominant control with my partner?
- I felt that as a woman that the submissive role was likely what was expected and the role I had been conditioned to accept.
- My partner in this relationship needed to learn to be the dominant in many areas of life and become a leader but was inexperienced in this realm.
- My partner had a high pain threshold, when I was given consent to bind and whip him, he went to sub drop in 1 minute flat having a very bad ab reaction.
- I, on the other hand, intensely enjoyed the act of inflicting pain on someone a little too much and I became frightened that I would harm someone in this role.
(Also my enjoyment doing this as the dominant was not arrousing to me, sexually. This disturbed me, also.)
I provided him with what I call "the illusion of power", in this space his self esteem was able to flourish, he became more confident in himself, he realized his potential, over time he became more capable of being the dominant on his own.
I hoped that he could assume the leadership/dominant role in our relationship, at some point. I would need a switch/equal partner who can assume either, in reality, but during a time of true vulnerability (and any time I explicitly tried to give him control or my "true" submission in my life or in bed), our relationship would become volatile. He would have a nervous breakdown and lash out causing me to leave for my safety.
He would become overwhelmed with the responsibility of leadership, dominance and unable to mentally handle it. Unable to fully assume that role, we would return back to the power dynamic from before, things would be okay. Then I would give him control hoping he could lead/dom but the same thing would happen. Eventually it was going to have to end permanently.
He enjoyed satisfying and pleasing me, I allowed him to do so. He had low self esteem, grew up with a family of strong women who would manipulate and exploit him. He needed to learn to take charge. We had become well read on BDSM resources, the relationship was highly therapeutic for us both.
He, unfortunately, had never been in a dominant role and needed to for his sake and guiding him thru this was therapeutic and empowering for him. I had hoped he would become a good leader/dom or equal...but...eh.
Would I hold some guys hand thru it again? Probably not.
I am exploring embracing the control/dominance aspect and beginning to accept that I wasn't a sub in the first place but don't mind being one if needed. Would prefer future partners to have experience in that realm or at the least, lead the relationship and not buckle from the pressure when they are in control.
That was a very thorough explanation and good points to ponder. Not everyone may be prepared to lead.Wow. Lots of patience. But it seems you both learned something, so worth it. This is one of the most interesting posts I have read.
Quite true, it is wonderful you care so much!!A sub of someone I know *literally said to me* when I worried for their safety with a dominant who "claims to be autistic", but he isn't autistic at all, he is a psychopath. I told them an inability to read emotional or non verbal cues was a *potential* danger to their safety. This dominant literally told their submissive it was a good thing, because a a submissive will manipulate their dominant with their facial expressions while they are in subspace.
I almost fell off my chair.
What this actually is, is an unqualified dominant straight up lying to their sub by refusing a submissive after care
(Scene is over, sub space happens at the end) while they are in a state of complete physical/mental/emotional vulnerability with no mental/physical/emotional capacity to manipulate anyone at all. Where his ONE responsibility is to look after his partner and emotionally comfort them, support them, or provide them with safety and security.
There is a thing called sub drop. Which this submissive likely feels far too familiar with. This is a dangerous place. I pointed her to Emergency BDSM resources. I can't talk sense into this person what's being done to them.
The lack of competency in people who identify with BDSM and use it as an excuse to harm others is far too prevalent. BDSM has rules so everybody is Safe. Sane. Consensual. Needs are met. Nobody falls of the deep end or gets shoved off.
I was horrified when I heard this, today.
What is a quality BDSM relationship? Not this
Quite true, it is wonderful you care so much!!
Thoughts on D/s borrowed and revamped a bit...
A D/s relationship is just that…a relationship. Some people who practice D/s get off on having a bunch of rules and routines, but no matter what the format, the same basic ‘vanilla’ rules apply.
Dick pics or telling a potential sub that they must call you "Master" or "Sir" probably won't get you very far.
Kindness and the benefit of the doubt will go a long way. Just like in any other relationship.
Sex is fabulous, but sex alone isn’t a relationship.
Communicate, communicate, communicate. Say what you mean, and mean what you say.
Don’t stay with someone who makes you feel badly about yourself.
Consent is given freely without coercion. (And there should never be a ‘but’ or an ‘except’ after this one.)
Don’t say it’s okay if it’s not.
Bad days will happen. Don’t threaten to leave every time things are difficult.
Remember that sometimes you have to place harmony above your desire to be right.
When all else fails default to love.
Calling yourself a Dom, sub, Master, slave, or pet doesn’t change the basics of how relationships work. You are still two people who need to work out all of the usual stuff with each other.
Take her on a real date. Open her door. Compliment her on something other than how she looks. Her being submissive doesn’t mean basic chivalry goes out the window.
Don’t expect him to read your mind. If you want something communicate. Don’t assume that sex is the only thing he cares about.
Learn to love yourself so you can love and be loved fully. The bondage, ropes, kneeling, and rules come later. They are the structure that holds the relationship. If you have those things but don’t have anything to fill the space inside then the structure collapses.
Have to agree here. Not all "relationships" are about Love (It can be all about sex, and all parties can walk away happy). I once had a friend with benefits. Neither of us wanted anything from the relationship but sex. We had been friends for years but we were not really compatible for a "relationship". As long as both (or maybe more ) parties are up front and honest about what they want from the relationship it can work out fine.
I think I understand what you're getting at, but I don't really believe the example of a "friend with benefits" fits the bill. Not all love is the same, but I love my friends...I care for my friends...I connect emotionally with my friends...I have relationships with my friends???
In order to truly experience BDSM void of relationship would require a visit to a stranger. Making this into an ongoing arrangement with this "stranger", while possible, would probably not appeal to the vast majority of people precisely because there is no love involved...no connection...no relationship.
But that may be just me...if there's no love (at whatever level) I'd pass. It's the love that makes us stronger and happier.
Relationships are complex, no matter the type or the people involved!Thoughts on D/s borrowed and revamped a bit...
A D/s relationship is just that…a relationship. Some people who practice D/s get off on having a bunch of rules and routines, but no matter what the format, the same basic ‘vanilla’ rules apply.
Dick pics or telling a potential sub that they must call you "Master" or "Sir" probably won't get you very far.
Kindness and the benefit of the doubt will go a long way. Just like in any other relationship.
Sex is fabulous, but sex alone isn’t a relationship.
Communicate, communicate, communicate. Say what you mean, and mean what you say.
Don’t stay with someone who makes you feel badly about yourself.
Consent is given freely without coercion. (And there should never be a ‘but’ or an ‘except’ after this one.)
Don’t say it’s okay if it’s not.
Bad days will happen. Don’t threaten to leave every time things are difficult.
Remember that sometimes you have to place harmony above your desire to be right.
When all else fails default to love.
Calling yourself a Dom, sub, Master, slave, or pet doesn’t change the basics of how relationships work. You are still two people who need to work out all of the usual stuff with each other.
Take her on a real date. Open her door. Compliment her on something other than how she looks. Her being submissive doesn’t mean basic chivalry goes out the window.
Don’t expect him to read your mind. If you want something communicate. Don’t assume that sex is the only thing he cares about.
Learn to love yourself so you can love and be loved fully. The bondage, ropes, kneeling, and rules come later. They are the structure that holds the relationship. If you have those things but don’t have anything to fill the space inside then the structure collapses.