GiaCat
Gia Cat
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2007
- Posts
- 3,891
Bush and Gore's faces fused together is just creepy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"We're going to see how things play out today," Trump told Martha MacCallum. "Hopefully they'll play out well and hopefully we won't have to worry about it, meaning hopefully we'll win."
He said he wants to watch today and tonight and make sure that everything is "honest" in the voting process.
The Republican nominee said he fully understands the importance of a smooth, peaceful transition of power, but he is still concerned about the election being rigged against him.
"Are you saying that you believe this will not be over tonight, Mr. Trump?" MacCallum pressed.
"No, I'm not saying that," Trump replied. "I said I have to look at what's happening. I have to look at reports that are coming out."
And that has what to do with what?
Ishmael
The dems are doing just that.
In reality there is no benefit to Clinton, at least not as if she's going to overturn the election.
But what it does do is to plant the seeds of doubt in the minds of her supporters. After all, why call for a recount unless there is evidence of nefarious behavior.......even if there really isn't. The goal here is to de-legitimize Trumps election. Just as the left did to Bush in 2000. Even if the recount, as it undoubtedly will, shows that Trump still won, the suspicion that Clinton, and by extension they, were cheated out of the election is all that is required.
They have no real evidence, but their agenda is on the line and they're going to do ANYTHING can to push their agenda forward and block anything Trump may have planned.
Ishmael
Can and were. Two different notions. Anything is possible but it occurs to me that you'd better show proof that something DID happen before you take action. A hack is like any other crime scene, there is always evidence left behind. Show me the evidence, not some nebulous "it could have happened' bull shit.
Ishmael
The only point I was making was that it was probable that voting technology could be hacked. I expected both sides to do whatever they could to win the election by legitimate and illegitimate means.
PWAAAHHHAhahahahaha!! Damn, that's funny coming from you.Show me the evidence, not suspicions.
Ishmael
Show me the evidence, not suspicions.
Ishmael
PWAAAHHHAhahahahaha!! Damn, that's funny coming from you.
Now we know why the focus on media reporting on possible hacking before the election.
The truth about their polling was known to them.
But not what they reported...
![]()
![]()
And if he wins again, do you think it fails to legitimize?
What am I saying, of course it does. The faux recount proves the election was stolen...
They always are, just like, as I was just reading Krugman has announced that we are heading into world-wide recession...
![]()
![]()
You do realize that making sure that we have free and accurate elections according to Democratic National Committee talking points was racist up until Hillary lost?
True the vote was specifically singled out as a racist organization for simply wanting to purge the voter rolls of the dead and the imaginary.
The party that's against identifying voters doesn't really have any room to concern themselves with who voted, and how often.
Without diving into the rest of your reply, virtually all states have an automatic recount law in effect. In most states if the vote is within 1%, a recount is automatic.
Moving on, if you agree, then what is the point of following your agreement with that question? If a recount were prescribed, it would have been done by now.
It's also ironic to me that Hillary would jump back in after having already conceded. Isn't she doing the exact thing she spent the last several weeks of the campaign accusing Trump of planning to do. And holding that up as evidence of his unfitness for office? The irony certainly isn't lost on me, how about you?
Ishmael
If you've never noticed over the years I'm often asking just to know where people stand. Everybody has their own opinions on some of these things and some things do come down to opinions and not facts.
I was unaware that any state had automatic recount laws on the books.
I had no idea that Trump is going to control the central banks of so many nations.
Ishmael
Show me the evidence, not suspicions.
Ishmael
And, he going to start war and put the Jews in oven and shit!
Maybe some Hispanics and blacks too...
Bindered women!
Without diving into the rest of your reply, virtually all states have an automatic recount law in effect. In most states if the vote is within 1%, a recount is automatic.
Moving on, if you agree, then what is the point of following your agreement with that question? If a recount were prescribed, it would have been done by now.
It's also ironic to me that Hillary would jump back in after having already conceded. Isn't she doing the exact thing she spent the last several weeks of the campaign accusing Trump of planning to do. And holding that up as evidence of his unfitness for office? The irony certainly isn't lost on me, how about you?
Ishmael
Only 20 states have automatic recount laws.