Remember when the entire media had a panic attack

[beezzz]

Remember when the entire media had a panic attack over Trumps comments on the Access Hollywood tape? While this was going on, those same people knew that Epstein was raping children.....and Weinstein was raping women....... and then decided to cover it up.


I do

DO YOU?

 

[suurfer]

Finally, a thread about it.

The comments that I read on it referred to:
- besides the duplicity factor (Kavanaugh ok, Epstein cover up)
- whispers that some top MSM execs. could have been involved with Epstein too
- new statements that his injuries pointed to homicide.
And that after the death of such a key witness, prosecution went soft on some of the accused.

 

[HisArpy]

Finally, a thread about it.

The comments that I read on it referred to:
- besides the duplicity factor (Kavanaugh ok, Epstein cover up)
- whispers that some top MSM execs. could have been involved with Epstein too
- new statements that his injuries pointed to homicide.
And that after the death of such a key witness, prosecution went soft on some of the accused.

You forgot to mention the denials and hush money over Matt Lauer. And, speaking of hush money, you also forgot about those who made claims against a few US Congressmen which were paid off with taxpayer dollars and no accounting of who or how much.


Personally, I don't really care if someone wants to stick his dick someplace he knows he shouldn't. I also don't care if someone is stupid enough to go along with it because they think it'll help their career or keep their job.

What I care about is standing up when it's discovered. In whatever form or forum, you did it, own up to it. Yes, that includes Trump.

 

[beezzz]

its HIPPO CREEPSY


as usual!

 

[69johnmichaels]

Amen to that

You forgot to mention the denials and hush money over Matt Lauer. And, speaking of hush money, you also forgot about those who made claims against a few US Congressmen which were paid off with taxpayer dollars and no accounting of who or how much.


Personally, I don't really care if someone wants to stick his dick someplace he knows he shouldn't. I also don't care if someone is stupid enough to go along with it because they think it'll help their career or keep their job.

What I care about is standing up when it's discovered. In whatever form or forum, you did it, own up to it. Yes, that includes Trump.

---------Yes, that includes trump and his supporters and enablers.--------

 

[beezzz]

we

dont

care


but highlighting HIM and BK and squashing stories on H Weinstein and J Epstein.......................

 

[HisArpy]

---------Yes, that includes trump and his supporters and enablers.--------

It includes ANYONE of any political stripe.

The fact that you can't see that through your TDS is why you have TDS.

 

[Misshotndeep]

Which time? 2012,2000? It’s happen a few times over the last 20 years.

 

[seeshelly]

Name of the game

For Liberals a hypocritical double standard is the name of the game. That is because they are not governed by principle. They are governed by their own emotions and since they are living in a fantasy realm their thought patterns do not include logic. Liberalism is a mental illness. I am not saying that as name calling. I am just being factual. They can't think or reason. I see example after example on here like the solid points in this tread but there is no hope that any liberal will even pause and ponder what you are saying. The hate pumped into their brainwashed minds will just react with a kneejerk anger toward your logic.

 

[Misshotndeep]

For Liberals a hypocritical double standard is the name of the game. That is because they are not governed by principle. They are governed by their own emotions and since they are living in a fantasy realm their thought patterns do not include logic. Liberalism is a mental illness. I am not saying that as name calling. I am just being factual. They can't think or reason. I see example after example on here like the solid points in this tread but there is no hope that any liberal will even pause and ponder what you are saying. The hate pumped into their brainwashed minds will just react with a kneejerk anger toward your logic.

No that’s name calling. Call a spade a spade. And both parties are altra radical in their ideas and sheep following greedy leaders. Aka your all fucked in the head.

 

[Rightguide]

I have a hunch the Epstein case is going to blow wide open and those tapes aboard the Lolita Express showing Clinton and others engaged in questionable behavior with females looking exceedingly young will be made public by somebody.

 

[Conager]

If they didn't have double standards they wouldn't have any standards at all. They always do this on every issue they poutrage whenever their ox is not being gored.

They were OUTRAGED that Anita Hill was uncomfortable about words. (but said nothing and gave indication such talk was ok)

They were dismissive when the most powerful man on Earth violated an intern (because she said nothing and gave indication such activity was ok) It was a "private matter."

They were OUTRAGED about Iran/Contra especially the paying for hostages part.

They had no problem with literally pallets full of cash were sent to Iran.

They were OUTRAGED about Bush's regime change policies a d use of drones.

They gave Obama the Nobel peace prize for whinging about the above and said nothing when he continued those policies and worse.

They are OUTRAGED that Trump would decide to move 50 troops out of harms way.

They had no problem with Obama's precipitous pullout from Iraq.

They are OUTRAGED that Trump would even consider delaying sending millions in lethal aid to Ukraine.

They found Obama to be exercising wise restraint when he refused the Ukrainians any lethal aid.

They are OUTRAGED that the Trump would nominate judges that the partisan hacks at the ABA claim to be "unqualified."

Kagen and the Notorious RGB did not have the typical qualifications for SCOTUS. Being a "wise Latina" does not make up for bring a poor judge.

You can't ever take anything that they're outraged about seriously.

 

[Desiremakesmeweak]

Well said, Conager.

'The media' are toxic.

 

[beezzz]

Kagen and the Notorious RGB did not have the typical qualifications for SCOTUS. Being a "wise Latina" does not substitute for time serving as a actual judge.

You can't ever take anything that they're outraged about seriously.

you mean, Soda Mayer

 

[Conager]

you mean, Soda Mayer

https://www.capitalismmagazine.com/2009/07/judge-sotomayors-qualifications/

Right, the other unqualified juror. The only qualification either of them had was lack-a-penii.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/05/would_someone_please_list_kaga.html

The only good thing about Obam's picks is one is a diabetic.

Notorious RGB had zero judicial experience when Carter put her on the court of appeals. She at least though had some time on the appeals court before Clinton put her on scotus.

Trump needs to find an anti-Roe v Wade, black, epilectic, blind, paraplegic, left-handed, transwoman to replace RGB to maintain the "balance" on the court.

 

[beezzz]

CBS Has Fired The Whistleblower Employee Who Leaked The ABC Video About Spiking The Epstein Story


Here’s a real whistleblower, exposing an actual wrong, who’s now being punished for it. So CBS is now colluding with ABC.

 

[beezzz]

Looks like two media outlets conspired to retaliate against a whistleblower. Meanwhile, they’re claiming Resistance talking point that merely identifying Ukraine leaker — even though he’s protected from retaliation— is unacceptable. Interesting

 

[Curmudgeonly]

He has no protection; he is not an actual whistleblower.

He also needs no protection, as he observed nothing at all, much less observed anything in the course of his official duties.

If this is allowed to stand with as him as a whistleblower than any partisan could claim to be a whistleblower just because they have an opinion about something that they surmise or hear second or third hand might have happened.

The reason they called him a whistleblower was so they would not have to reveal his actual sourcing, which was nonexistent, and his motivation, which was malevolent

 

[Rightguide]

He has no protection; he is not an actual whistleblower.

He also needs no protection, as he observed nothing at all, much less observed anything in the course of his official duties.

If this is allowed to stand with as him as a whistleblower than any partisan could claim to be a whistleblower just because they have an opinion about something that they surmise or hear second or third hand might have happened.

The reason they called him a whistleblower was so they would not have to reveal his actual sourcing, which was nonexistent, and his motivation, which was malevolent

Precisely.