Roy Moore

[Luk]

Actually, each state has immensely different laws to address age differences in this regard. So, factually, your hyperbolic "The Law" is just FAKE NEWS. And, again, I hate to learn you, but words are most definitely literal and, in all honest applications, are, of course, fully semantical. You're simply - and I mean that word in its very most literal, sematical sense - playing amateur politics, as usual.

You know, it's not that hard, to figure out, who you are, with all of, the extraneous: punctuation.

Plus, you spelled "semantical", - wron-g.

 

[Bookishleigh]

"Moore": Will ask your parents for permission to date you"

"Moore": If It Was Good Enough for Mary, It's Good Enough For Your Daughter.

That's the biblical spin on old enough to bleed.....

 

[Luk]

"Moore": If It Was Good Enough for Mary, It's Good Enough For Your Daughter.

That's the biblical spin on old enough to bleed.....

"Grass on the field, play ball. If not, just hold a scrimmage."

 

[Wrong Element]

Actually, each state has immensely different laws to address age differences in this regard. So, factually, your hyperbolic "The Law" is just FAKE NEWS. And, again, I hate to learn you, but words are most definitely literal and, in all honest applications, are, of course, fully semantical. You're simply - and I mean that word in its very most literal, sematical sense - playing amateur politics, as usual.

Whether or not Moore broke any laws is beside the point. Plenty of things are perfectly legal and yet politically damaging.

I assume most people will believe that a man in his 30s who made a habit of hitting on high school girls is a creep. And given Moore's self-imposed status as the Godliest Man in Politics, a hypocritical creep at that.

 

[SpeareChucker]

I am thinking Bill Clinton had serious sexual allegations against him and the mainstream media ignored them dismissed them and referred to them as liars and sluts. Those women have never went away. Then it was Donald Trump's turn and those women have all went away, but we won't let go of their memories. Now we have this Judge Moore enjoying the same tactic and shamefully the members of my party want to convict him without so much as a trial. As I am thinking this, I am also wondering, once the election is over, will we once again be clinging to memories.
I am believing that convicting a man based upon his politics and not his deeds make us look untrustworthy and capricious. With all of the people now under scrutiny for claims assaulting women, men and young people I find it disingenuous to focus on only one political example instead a broader examination of not just the predators but those who enable them and who create an atmosphere of fear and intimidation (even using the expectation of a quid pro quo) to keep the victims silent.
I have read from several sources about most of these predators, everybody knew it. Everybody knew it and no one did a thing until the dam broke, but now that flood is arriving we are focusing only upon one particular bucket of water as if it were the most important outrage on the planet. Comrades, this is not the way to win hearts and minds because it appears that we are once again willing to let the matter go away by dropping the topic and keeping it out of the news and maybe that is why we are so focused on this judge; most of those predators are on our team. If we are allowed to let this tarnish remain upon us and our brand, then we have no one to blame for ourselves if we continue to lose elections in places where we used to win them.

 

[Boxlicker101]

I would expect that the DA of any county using his perceived authority to trawl the local mall and county courthouse for young girls is an abuse of power, even in Alabama. He even waived his power as DA in the face of one of his alleged victims in his statement to Beverly Young Nelson.

I would agree if the girl had been charged or accused of criminal behavior, but the one Moore met in the courthouse was there for a civil case and was the object of contention rather than a party in the case.

 

[Bookishleigh]

I am thinking Bill Clinton had serious sexual allegations against him and the mainstream media ignored them dismissed them and referred to them as liars and sluts. Those women have never went away. Then it was Donald Trump's turn and those women have all went away, but we won't let go of their memories. Now we have this Judge Moore enjoying the same tactic and shamefully the members of my party want to convict him without so much as a trial. As I am thinking this, I am also wondering, once the election is over, will we once again be clinging to memories.
I am believing that convicting a man based upon his politics and not his deeds make us look untrustworthy and capricious. With all of the people now under scrutiny for claims assaulting women, men and young people I find it disingenuous to focus on only one political example instead a broader examination of not just the predators but those who enable them and who create an atmosphere of fear and intimidation (even using the expectation of a quid pro quo) to keep the victims silent.
I have read from several sources about most of these predators, everybody knew it. Everybody knew it and no one did a thing until the dam broke, but now that flood is arriving we are focusing only upon one particular bucket of water as if it were the most important outrage on the planet. Comrades, this is not the way to win hearts and minds because it appears that we are once again willing to let the matter go away by dropping the topic and keeping it out of the news and maybe that is why we are so focused on this judge; most of those predators are on our team. If we are allowed to let this tarnish remain upon us and our brand, then we have no one to blame for ourselves if we continue to lose elections in places where we used to win them.

I think it's important to note that Moore proved himself unqualified for the position even before all these allegations of sexual misconduct. You have a man twice removed from the bench as a judge because of his refusal to comply with federal law. He also unethically ordered other judges to disobey a Supreme Court ruling.

I get he is against same sex marriage; however, when you take the bench you agree to uphold the law, not shun it and defy it. Judges are in a position to set aside their personal biases on a regular basis (be it on abortion, gun control, and even gay marriage). He failed his job as a judge - I cannot imagine he will do much better as a senator.

 

[Luk]

Whether or not Moore broke any laws is beside the point. Plenty of things are perfectly legal and yet politically damaging.

I assume most people will believe that a man in his 30s who made a habit of hitting on high school girls is a creep. And given Moore's self-imposed status as the Godliest Man in Politics, a hypocritical creep at that.

Dude was kicked out of the mall for creeping out tweeners. How anyone can still consider him for any publically held position beside a beheading should be banned from breathing.

 

[Libsam]

Y'all checked your news feeds lately?
Looks like the yearbook signature may be a fraud.

The two sets of 77's used in the signature don't match. He was never a DA. And it looks like the blue ink colors don't match.

https://www.peoplespunditdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Beverly-Young-Nelson-Roy-Moore-Yearbook.jpg

 

[Wats_butthole]

I am thinking Bill Clinton had serious sexual allegations against him and the mainstream media ignored them dismissed them and referred to them as liars and sluts. Those women have never went away. Then it was Donald Trump's turn and those women have all went away, but we won't let go of their memories. Now we have this Judge Moore enjoying the same tactic and shamefully the members of my party want to convict him without so much as a trial. As I am thinking this, I am also wondering, once the election is over, will we once again be clinging to memories.
I am believing that convicting a man based upon his politics and not his deeds make us look untrustworthy and capricious. With all of the people now under scrutiny for claims assaulting women, men and young people I find it disingenuous to focus on only one political example instead a broader examination of not just the predators but those who enable them and who create an atmosphere of fear and intimidation (even using the expectation of a quid pro quo) to keep the victims silent.
I have read from several sources about most of these predators, everybody knew it. Everybody knew it and no one did a thing until the dam broke, but now that flood is arriving we are focusing only upon one particular bucket of water as if it were the most important outrage on the planet. Comrades, this is not the way to win hearts and minds because it appears that we are once again willing to let the matter go away by dropping the topic and keeping it out of the news and maybe that is why we are so focused on this judge; most of those predators are on our team. If we are allowed to let this tarnish remain upon us and our brand, then we have no one to blame for ourselves if we continue to lose elections in places where we used to win them.

The only liar here is you and the only slut is your mother.

 

[Luk]

Y'all checked your news feeds lately?
Looks like the yearbook signature may be a fraud.

The two sets of 77's used in the signature don't match. He was never a DA. And it looks like the blue ink colors don't match.

https://www.peoplespunditdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Beverly-Young-Nelson-Roy-Moore-Yearbook.jpg

Dude. Aren't his own words enough for you?

 

[adrina]

I am thinking Bill Clinton had serious sexual allegations against him and the mainstream media ignored them dismissed them and referred to them as liars and sluts. Those women have never went away. Then it was Donald Trump's turn and those women have all went away, but we won't let go of their memories. Now we have this Judge Moore enjoying the same tactic and shamefully the members of my party want to convict him without so much as a trial. As I am thinking this, I am also wondering, once the election is over, will we once again be clinging to memories.
I am believing that convicting a man based upon his politics and not his deeds make us look untrustworthy and capricious. With all of the people now under scrutiny for claims assaulting women, men and young people I find it disingenuous to focus on only one political example instead a broader examination of not just the predators but those who enable them and who create an atmosphere of fear and intimidation (even using the expectation of a quid pro quo) to keep the victims silent.
I have read from several sources about most of these predators, everybody knew it. Everybody knew it and no one did a thing until the dam broke, but now that flood is arriving we are focusing only upon one particular bucket of water as if it were the most important outrage on the planet. Comrades, this is not the way to win hearts and minds because it appears that we are once again willing to let the matter go away by dropping the topic and keeping it out of the news and maybe that is why we are so focused on this judge; most of those predators are on our team. If we are allowed to let this tarnish remain upon us and our brand, then we have no one to blame for ourselves if we continue to lose elections in places where we used to win them.

False. The lawsuit is an ongoing process.

 

[Unabatable]

Whether or not Moore broke any laws is beside the point. Plenty of things are perfectly legal and yet politically damaging.

Yet, my only point in direct response to that poster's mispoint was to state the fact that each state's laws vary greatly, that there is no "The Law" as that poster asserted. Which makes your irrelevancy just that. Try to keep up next time.

BTW: Moore, like every politician, is more interested in his own political ambition than in doing what's right for American politics. If he was even half as ethical as he seems to love to proclaim himself, he would've stepped-down long ago.

 

[Libsam]

Dude. Aren't his own words enough for you?

I'm not defending Moore.

 

[Wats_butthole]

I'm deflecting for Moore.

We know.

 

[Lorilei]

Y'all checked your news feeds lately?
Looks like the yearbook signature may be a fraud.

The two sets of 77's used in the signature don't match. He was never a DA. And it looks like the blue ink colors don't match.

https://www.peoplespunditdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Beverly-Young-Nelson-Roy-Moore-Yearbook.jpg

Are you being serious right now?

 

[Luk]

Are you being serious right now?

HAVE YOU NOT CHECKED YOUR NEWS FEED !!!!!!!11111111111

 

[Wrong Element]

Y'all checked your news feeds lately?
Looks like the yearbook signature may be a fraud.

The two sets of 77's used in the signature don't match. He was never a DA. And it looks like the blue ink colors don't match.

He was indeed an assistant district attorney.

So now we've got that, plus his wife claiming the inscription had to be forged because the Hickory House wasn't open in 1977 (spoiler: it was). Plus the Moores taking an old letter of support from various pastors and re-releasing it with the suggestion that it represents current endorsements post-scandal.

For a man so much in love with the Ten Commandments, he seems to be having some trouble obeying them.

 

[Lorilei]

HAVE YOU NOT CHECKED YOUR NEWS FEED !!!!!!!11111111111

YOU DONT GET TO YELL AT ME!

 

[gotsnowgotslush]

If he is threatening his victims, by telling them that he is the District Attorney...

 

[Libsam]

I don't like the guy, it's all gross, but now I'm really interested in this story.

Whether Moore loses or not, goes to prison or not is inconsequential, but if that yearbook is fake, that's bigger than Roy Moore.

 

[dontbackdown]

I don't like the guy, it's all gross, but now I'm really interested in this story.

Whether Moore loses or not, goes to prison or not is inconsequential, but if that yearbook is fake, that's bigger than Roy Moore.

The sad part about that is that if it is fake it essentially calls into question all the other accusations. It makes ALL of them begin to look like a political 'hit job.'

Moore may indeed be all that the original accusers claim, but should the Year Book prove to be false they're going to get smeared by the shit that flies from that fan.

I don't like the guy, didn't before the accusations flew. But he's a problem for the voters of Alabama, not me.

AND..............

I find it oh so interesting that he's just one name on a LONG list of recent sexual predators to be in the news recently. And virtually all of the rest of them are bonafide, card carrying progressives. The exception to the mean but currying the most amount of attention. What's up with that?

 

[RobDownSouth]

Of COURSE you don't like the guy!

The sad part about that is that if it is fake it essentially calls into question all the other accusations. It makes ALL of them begin to look like a political 'hit job.'Moore may indeed be all that the original accusers claim, but should the Year Book prove to be false they're going to get smeared by the shit that flies from that fan.I don't like the guy, didn't before the accusations flew. But he's a problem for the voters of Alabama, not me.AND..............I find it oh so interesting that he's just one name on a LONG list of recent sexual predators to be in the news recently. And virtually all of the rest of them are bonafide, card carrying progressives. The exception to the mean but currying the most amount of attention. What's up with that?

Deflection, deflection, deflection.
"Yee haw Roy! We Got Your Back!"

Look at the n00b totally-not-defending ole Roy Moore.

 

[dontbackdown]

Deflection, deflection, deflection.
"Yee haw Roy! We Got Your Back!"

Look at the n00b totally-not-defending ole Roy Moore.

Still plagued by reading comprehension I see.

 

[phrodeau]

Y'all checked your news feeds lately?
Looks like the yearbook signature may be a fraud.

The two sets of 77's used in the signature don't match. He was never a DA. And it looks like the blue ink colors don't match.

https://www.peoplespunditdaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Beverly-Young-Nelson-Roy-Moore-Yearbook.jpg

The original Getty image shows no color variation.

There are several matches between the text and the signature. Slants are similar, capital M's are similar, small Y's are similar, and the 7's are more consistent than the 2's.