Liar
now with 17% more class
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2003
- Posts
- 43,715
You don't have to go 300 years back in time, or to hypothetical scenarios to ask that question.alyxen said:This has been some great discussion on this topic!! Thanks all!!!
One of the general things that has been talked about a bit is that the definition of science fiction is constantly changing.
Now, let me throw a new question out to you.....![]()
Let's say someone wrote a book 300 years ago about underwater vessels (submarines). At the time that would have been considered science fiction.
The question is this: Would it still be considered science fiction today, or would it now be relegated to just fiction?
Take a peek at Jules Verne, who shot people to the moon in a cannon. Or take a peek at Orwell's '1984'. They both pictured future scenarios of dates that have passed. Scenarios that proved more or less incorrect.
Or take a look at the tagline for the 1981 movie 'Escape from New York': "1997. New York city is now a maximum security prison.Breaking out is impossible. Breaking in is insane." NY might be tough these days. But not THAT tough.
Are those reality fiction then? I dunno. They have gone from secribing a possible future to describing a parallell reality. Unless they manage to portray the society in which they take place on every account that is what it is. Maybe <sci-fi needs an expire date, for when it's not plausible to build predicions that holds water and suspends the disbelief?
#L