Separate but equal?

Cheyenne

Ms. Smarty Pantsless
Joined
Apr 18, 2000
Posts
59,556
Is anyone else curious as to exactly what the differences are between how white and Asian students should prepare for the test and how Hispanic and black students should prepare? That would be the only logical reason I could support for separate meetings. But my bet is the answer is the same in both cases- there IS no way to prepare other than attend classes regularly in the first place. What am I missing here?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

ELK GROVE, Calif. - Middle school principal Philip Moore knows Hispanic and black students typically have lower scores on standardized tests than white or Asian students, so he called segregated meetings for parents to discuss how to prepare for the tests.


Because of the lower scores, Moore said, some Hispanic and black parents may feel uncomfortable talking about them in front of white or Asian parents.

But in a state in which Hispanics make up a third of California's 35 million residents and in which a single school district might speak 100 different languages, such a plan is segregating parents and students when it should be integrating them, critics say.

Asians make up about 11 percent and blacks represent seven percent of the state's population.

Before settling on the divided meetings, Moore said he spoke to about 20 parents of students at T.R. Smedberg Middle School. Parents and school officials will discuss test scores and grade point averages, and if scheduling is a problem, parents can attend any meeting, regardless of race.

Because such meetings are so new to education - officials and analysts nationwide said they had heard very little about them outside California - the education community outside Elk Grove knows little about them. There is, however, a vague feeling of uncertainty.

Instead of bringing students and parents together to produce higher test scores and better education, the meetings may backfire, said Jan Domene, president of the California Parent Teacher Association. "You don't want kids to feel it's OK to do (segregate)," and if school officials see segregation expanding, they should stop the meetings.

Fifty-one percent of Smedberg students who took last year's tests were white, state records show, while 15 percent were Hispanic, 14 percent Asian and 11 percent black. White and Asian students scored similarly well in the ranking, outscoring Hispanic and black students by more than 75 points.

Overall, the school posted an Academic Performance Index score of 730, with the state-set performance target being 800. The scores are based largely on the annual Stanford 9 test, which shows how individual and groups of California students in second through 11th grades are doing in comparison to other students in the United States.

The API scores can determine if schools receive extra state money and measure overall performance, so there's increased pressure on schools to improve their scores.

That's where the meetings at Smedberg come in, Elk Grove officials said.

Smaller groups make parents more comfortable, Moore said, adding that 53 different languages are spoken in his district south of Sacramento. "We want to get real honest answers."

Also, Moore said, students told him that if they had low scores they would be embarrassed to talk about their scores in front of a large group of people.

"I think stereotypes could be reinforced in a big group environment," Moore said.

Elk Grove Unified School District Superintendent Dave Gordon said Smedberg's seventh and eighth grade students understand the meetings are not "to segregate the parents" but to gather information.

Some parents complained after first hearing about the meetings, Moore said, but most have understood his intent.

"The meetings show the school is sensitive to the differences (among test scores)," said Deborah Thomas-Smith, a black parent with an eight-grade son at Smedberg. "It should be the norm that those unique individuals with unique problems get together."

Sometimes separation can make sense, said Gregory Hodge, leader of California Tomorrow, an Oakland-based advocacy group promoting culture and education. Some immigrant groups often feel intimidated by large groups and authority figures, such as principals and police officers.

Still, segregated meetings "might unconsciously set up more division than you intend," said Hodge, who is also a member of the Oakland Unified School District board. He added that a couple years ago, a middle school in Oakland segregated parents based on race so that they could discuss after school programs openly.

In the end, said Terry Francke, general counsel of the Sacramento-based California First Amendment Coalition, it's up to Moore to decide.

"He can hold meetings with anyone he pleases," Francke said. "If he believes there is a problem or issue more prevalent or relevant to one racial group in the school then I don't think anyone would question his ability."

Gordon isn't, saying Moore has his complete support. "It's well worth trying different strategies."
 
I highly doubt it will have much effiency. Maybe it would be best to segregate parents into kids who get crappy scores and kids who get good scores. Not every white kid scores high and not every black kid scores low.
 
Numerous studies have shown that the standardized tests in use today are culturally biased. I don't know what specifically, this principal thinks he's going to be able to do about it with his separate meetings.

Standardized tests aren't testing the curriculum taught and are designed to give a wide range of scores, so if more than say 70% of students answer a question correctly, the question is thrown out. This results in test scores being based not on classroom experience, but life experience and outside knowledge.

There is no way for a parent to make up for a lifetime of experiences in a week or even month before a standardized test.
 
morninggirl5 said:

There is no way for a parent to make up for a lifetime of experiences in a week or even month before a standardized test.

That's what I thought. I'm all for trying to raise test grades by teaching students well. But all I can see happening from these separate meetings is potential problems with the kids who now "know" which group they are "supposed" to be in- the higher score, smarter kids or the lower score, dumber kids. Kids are kids, they will use that info against each other to tease or hurt others. Just MHO.
 
Can't say I'm an expert on this, but I thought that most of the questions that were "culturally biased" were taken out long ago. I may have been reading about the SAT's, but I thought the same was true for the Stanford 9's and the other tests also.

I thought there we other factors that caused the division, the most important being parent/family level of education.
 
Back
Top