"Shit Storm"

How long ago was this? Do we know what his marital relationship was? Maybe his wife was willing to allow him to play around? She is in the "catbird" seat. All the money and maybe she doesn't even have to fuck him.

All of this happened way before he was a "public official".

Frankly it's none of our fucking business.

Now cums "Stormy" who was paid $130,000 to go away, but no, she discovered that Trump never signed the agreement. I'm sure she cashed the check.

Now she is cashing the check from CBS to appear on 60 minutes.

Once a Whore, Always a Whore!
 
How long ago was this? Do we know what his marital relationship was? Maybe his wife was willing to allow him to play around? She is in the "catbird" seat. All the money and maybe she doesn't even have to fuck him.

All of this happened way before he was a "public official".

Frankly it's none of our fucking business.

Now cums "Stormy" who was paid $130,000 to go away, but no, she discovered that Trump never signed the agreement. I'm sure she cashed the check.

Now she is cashing the check from CBS to appear on 60 minutes.

Once a Whore, Always a Whore!
It's not the sin, it's the cover-up.
 
How long ago was this? Do we know what his marital relationship was? Maybe his wife was willing to allow him to play around? She is in the "catbird" seat. All the money and maybe she doesn't even have to fuck him.

Pretty sure Mel had to fuck him at least once. Unless we're talking in vitro. What with separate rooms and all.
 
How long ago was this? Do we know what his marital relationship was? Maybe his wife was willing to allow him to play around? She is in the "catbird" seat. All the money and maybe she doesn't even have to fuck him.

All of this happened way before he was a "public official".

Frankly it's none of our fucking business.

Now cums "Stormy" who was paid $130,000 to go away, but no, she discovered that Trump never signed the agreement. I'm sure she cashed the check.

Now she is cashing the check from CBS to appear on 60 minutes.

Once a Whore, Always a Whore!

It's interesting that everyone seems to think that because Trump didn't sign the agreement that it still doesn't bind the party who did.

As to Stormy, the agreement was fully executed and can be enforced because it meets all of the legal requirements to be a binding contract. If she talks, she's liable for damages.
 
It's interesting that everyone seems to think that because Trump didn't sign the agreement that it still doesn't bind the party who did.

As to Stormy, the agreement was fully executed and can be enforced because it meets all of the legal requirements to be a binding contract. If she talks, she's liable for damages.

contracts consist of offers and acceptance and require signatures of both contracting parties to be considered valid. Any first year law student could tell you that.
 
I...so far am having a difficult time finding Trump in some kind of legal fault here.

So far to me, it looks like some money hungry whores are breaking a legal agreement that Trump may or may not had them to sign as in his attorney was covering his ass for him as he should have.

As for Trump's other relations at the time if there was any that is between them and it would seem that all parties knew what he was (womanizer, doesn't seem to hide it much.) and perhaps accepted it.

From all the winking and sly smiles and slight nods, that I am seeing from the news people they are going to ride the situation for all it's worth...and that is the relative neutral ones!:rolleyes:

I expect most very rich people, both male and female make arrangements of some kind for long term affairs or fucks...
 
contracts consist of offers and acceptance and require signatures of both contracting parties to be considered valid. Any first year law student could tell you that.


Lol. Winner - NOT!

A binding contract requires a writing containing the terms and conditions for which there is consideration and which is signed by the party to be charged.

If you're relying on first year law students to give you legal advice I'd suggest you hire a real lawyer. One who understands that little thing called the Statute of Frauds.

The NDA may not be "fully executed" but it WAS executed by Stormy Daniels. She is bound by the terms within should Trump decide to enforce them.
 
contracts consist of offers and acceptance and require signatures of both contracting parties to be considered valid. Any first year law student could tell you that.

Even if the contract is viewed as valid without Trump's signature, the damages clause will get thrown out by the court. I'm certain Stormy's lawyer knows this.
 
All this story has done is show that Trump has fucked lots of hot chicks.

Where's the scandal?

Or maybe this is some kind of counter-op to make Trump look cool to sexual deviants (liberals)?

LOL
 
All this story has done is show that Trump has fucked lots of hot chicks.

Where's the scandal?

Or maybe this is some kind of counter-op to make Trump look cool to sexual deviants (liberals)?

LOL

The payment to Stormy just before the election. That's where the legal jeapordy is for Trump.
 
It's interesting that everyone seems to think that because Trump didn't sign the agreement that it still doesn't bind the party who did.

As to Stormy, the agreement was fully executed and can be enforced because it meets all of the legal requirements to be a binding contract. If she talks, she's liable for damages.

No, that's not how a contract works.

Come on, you can't be that stupid.
 
All this story has done is show that Trump has fucked lots of hot chicks.

Where's the scandal?

Or maybe this is some kind of counter-op to make Trump look cool to sexual deviants (liberals)?

LOL

The scandal, which is so often the case, is the cover-up (which has been noted on this thread already--obviously you don't want to absorb that). In France, the leader wouldn't go through all of this cover-up business, would openly acknowledge having affairs (as long as they didn't involve political shenanigans), and that would be seen as normal (heterosexually healthy even).

The fact that the Trump camp would deny messing around like this and have it covered up right before an election connects it to an admission on Trump's part that it's a negative in his behavior (and the United States isn't France--politicians get jettisoned left and right for the behavior itself in the United States and have been for decades going at least back to Gary Hart. The irony here is the gross hypocrisy of the Evangelicals' support for him when theirs is usually the puritanical voice in these matters--even when they are messing around themselves). Having it done for him by someone else shelling out more than the election laws allowed is going to damage (I won't say sink; it would sink anyone else, but Trump is so deep in the mud that individual cases lose traction) and land him in jeopardy with the campaign contribution laws. It's a pretty blatant in-kind contribution--far above what is allowed and Cohn not having been paid back for it only makes it worse in law--it can't be characterized as a loan (and it's too late to do that now. The Trump folks have been typically incompetent in all of this).

I don't feel so sorry for his wife. She was messing around with him when he already had a wife--who messed around with him when he still had his first wife.

And on a porn discussion board, I snort at the hurt puppy reaction to messing around--it's the cover up (and almost always is) that's the issue.
 
Lol. Winner - NOT!

A binding contract requires a writing containing the terms and conditions for which there is consideration and which is signed by the party to be charged.

If you're relying on first year law students to give you legal advice I'd suggest you hire a real lawyer. One who understands that little thing called the Statute of Frauds.

The NDA may not be "fully executed" but it WAS executed by Stormy Daniels. She is bound by the terms within should Trump decide to enforce them.
Your problem there, Tim, is that she was paid $130k by Cohn. That was a payment in kind to the Trump campaign. That's about 125k above the allowed limit. Which means it was a crime. And NDAs can't be enforced if they involve the concealment of a crime.
 
IMO, I believe the NDA is enforceable even without Trump's signature. The problem for Trump is the use of a liquidated damages clause. The way it is written will cause it to be thrown out by a judge.

So she is in violation of the NDA, but there's no consequence for her since there wasn't a reasonable forecast of the anticipated or actual harm from a breach by her.
 
All this story has done is show that Trump has fucked lots of hot chicks.

Where's the scandal?

Or maybe this is some kind of counter-op to make Trump look cool to sexual deviants (liberals)?

LOL

Uhh, did your team say the same thing for Bill Clinton?
 
IMO, I believe the DNA is enforceable even without Trump's signature. The problem for Trump is the use of a liquidated damages clause. The way it is written will cause it to be thrown out by a judge.

So she is in violation of the NDA, but there's no consequence for her since there wasn't a reasonable forecast of the anticipated or actual harm from a breach by her.

No, a contract is not enforceable if all parties have not signed. That's basic contract law.

However, campaign finance laws WERE broken. The question is, who knew, and at what point? Trump's attorney is in deep shit. Is the president as well? That will have to come out in discovery.
 
Back
Top