Should Obama, Hillary Clinton, And Ambassador Rice Resign...

Hmmm, I didn't know there were suicide bombers in Iraq when Hussein was in power.

right, the Kurds never did anything.. just like they're not doing anything now


or the suicide bombers in Afghanistan either


or did Bush not send any troops there
 
right, the Kurds never did anything.. just like they're not doing anything now


or the suicide bombers in Afghanistan either


or did Bush not send any troops there

I think you're off topic.

I was talking about Iraq.

Specifically about Bush's problems after Hussein lost control.
 
I think you're off topic.

I was talking about Iraq.

Specifically about Bush's problems after Hussein lost control.




what happened in Afghanistan after the Taliban lost control... the happened under Bush too


and yet, both countries still had a history of suicide bombers


once again, if people had brushed up on their history, they woulda seen this coming
 
Clinton was impeached by for no reason and shouldn't have been impeached. No Obama and co didn't lie and even if they had they shouldn't be impeached nor should they resign over this issue. It's that plain and simple.

Clinton was rightly impeached for PERJURY, and to the eternal shame of all but the few Democrats that did not INSIST he step down.

What he did was FAR FAR MORE SERIOUS than anything Nixon was involved in.
 
...or be impeached?

Let me be clear. Nixon was forced to resign for lying and covering up. Bill Clinton was impeached for lying. No body was killed.

Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Susan Rice repeatedly lied to the American people about the nature of the attack on our consulate that resulted in the deaths of four Americans, and continued the lie for several days afterward despite knowing the truth. I ask again, should they resign?

Nixon was forced to resign over basically nothing. Its a shame the youth don't learn about all the good things he did and only learn about Watergate.

He was actually one of our better Presidents.
 
Clinton was impeached by for no reason and shouldn't have been impeached. No Obama and co didn't lie and even if they had they shouldn't be impeached nor should they resign over this issue. It's that plain and simple.

You try lying and obstructing justice in a sex harassment investigation and see what happens. Sex harassment laws are some of the strongest employment laws out there.

As a popular President, Clinton got away with what you or I would not. According to his own party, sex harrassment is one of the most pressing issues of our times and many people go to jail for perjury all the time. He got a pass because of his status and wealth.
 
Peter King calls for Susan Rice’s resignation

. . .

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0912/81808.html#ixzz27oz4ISV1

BTW: She's the incompetent fool who originally passed on killing bin Laden during the Clinton administration in the Sudan.:rolleyes:


OK, I read more. Did you?

Ari Fleischer said on CNN that Rice should keep her job.

“Susan Rice said something she should not have said,” the former spokesman for President George W. Bush said. “I don’t know if she was just being loose. I think the Obama administration has a history of underplaying threats to the United States, for example the underwear bomber, but I’m uncomfortable with this talk of resign because of what she said.”


Hyperventilating over initial assessments of rapidly developing stories doesn't further the conversation--anymore than Mitt's attempt to immediately score poltical points over a national tragedy does.
 
~Yawn~

Nobody is hyperventilating. This is simply a call for integrity in government. It is not the function of our government to purposely misinform the American people for the purpose of concealing malfeasance in an election cycle. Malfeasance that led to the deaths of four Americans.

"Integrity in government"?

You make me laugh.

This is just another step in your Long March, Comerade Vettebigot.

Operation Impeach The Negar continues!
 
~Yawn~

Nobody is hyperventilating. This is simply a call for integrity in government. It is not the function of our government to purposely misinform the American people for the purpose of concealing malfeasance in an election cycle. Malfeasance that led to the deaths of four Americans.

Obviously, you either feel comfortable being lied to by your elected representatives, or are simply too unsophisticated to know when somebody is pissing on your head and telling you it's raining. Worse, Maybe you don't care.

Actually, if you took the time to analyze it, you'd realize that it was the President and his administration who is trying to score political points off this tragedy by cynically misinforming you for political gain, thinking you're too stupid to know the difference.


I remember you having quite a different attitude from 2001 until 2009 when "He Who Shall Not Be Named" was in the White House, and pretty much everything they said consisted of lie upon lie upon lie. Then it was most unpatriotic to criticize anything the Prez did, and hundreds of thousands died by his deeds.

In the aftermath of a tragedy such as this, spokepeople must make their best assessment based on what they know, and then move on. Everyone else has moved on, now that we have better info. Same was true after the Oklahoma bombing when most thought it was damned furreners, until it became clear that it was just a radical right nut job acting alone.
 
If you want to really get to Obama why do you mess with this inconsequential crap. Take him down for a real crime.
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Sport/Pix/pictures/2012/6/4/1338787425514/Up-to-15-people-have-been-008.jpg


Drones: the west's new terror campaign

When was he elected World Tyrant?

I hear you, "But, but drones are cheaper, and low risk." What if the Russians were using them to crush a Pussy Riot?

This all started with John Bolton, Wise man of the Right! :rolleyes:

Then Peter King jumps in. Why are all republicans so well named?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top