SJC got Hobby Lobby wrong

BoyNextDoor

I hate liars
Joined
Apr 19, 2010
Posts
14,159
Even the way it is being reported is wrong. From the NYC "The companies objected to some of the methods, saying they are tantamount to abortion because they can prevent embryos from implanting in the womb. "

"Companies" can't object. There are legal fictions not people. This court has a warped sense of what individual freedoms are vs. what a legal entity is.

I'm looking forward to reading the decision and the dissent.
 
Even the way it is being reported is wrong. From the NYC "The companies objected to some of the methods, saying they are tantamount to abortion because they can prevent embryos from implanting in the womb. "

"Companies" can't object. There are legal fictions not people. This court has a warped sense of what individual freedoms are vs. what a legal entity is.

I'm looking forward to reading the decision and the dissent.

Hear him! Hear him!
 
6-30-14, the day we were told we can pick and choose which part of a law we want to obey.
 
"Companies" can't object. There are legal fictions not people.

That does give them legal standing to object to things, file lawsuits, etc. That is the nature of a legal entity. It is also what allows others (whether individuals or corporations) to sue them.
 
attachment.php

The racists must try every angle.

It's so blatantly obvious, they should be ashamed of themselves.
 
If SCOTUS thinks most women will accept this ruling, they are deluded, just as much as the owners of Hobby Lobby are.
 
Even the way it is being reported is wrong. From the NYC "The companies objected to some of the methods, saying they are tantamount to abortion because they can prevent embryos from implanting in the womb. "

"Companies" can't object. There are legal fictions not people. This court has a warped sense of what individual freedoms are vs. what a legal entity is.

I'm looking forward to reading the decision and the dissent.

~~~

The continuing ignorance of the Left is amazing, is it not? The legal concept for corporations was created for just that purpose, to give an association of people standing in court.

How really stupid can you folks be? Your ideology has blinded you.

amicus
 
~~~

The continuing ignorance of the Left is amazing, is it not? The legal concept for corporations was created for just that purpose, to give an association of people standing in court.

How really stupid can you folks be? Your ideology has blinded you.

amicunt

Tell us again how corporations can have religious beliefs, grandpa. :rolleyes:
 
6-30-14, the day we were told we can pick and choose which part of a law we want to obey.

~~~

Now you can function just like Nobama, picking and choosing which laws he will ignore or enforce.

For those who believe government should rule your lives, perhaps it is time to check your premises.

Why are you so deathly frightened of making your own decisions? Is freedom really that scary to you pussies?

amicus
 

They just created a shit storm. In their delusion, they think women will just roll over and beg for more because they still think women and their bodies are theirs to rule over.
 
~~~

The continuing ignorance of the Left is amazing, is it not? The legal concept for corporations was created for just that purpose, to give an association of people standing in court.

How really stupid can you folks be? Your ideology has blinded you.

amicus

Shouldn't you be masturbating to photos of Ayn Rand, or did AJ already make them sticky?
 
If SCOTUS thinks most women will accept this ruling, they are deluded, just as much as the owners of Hobby Lobby are.

~~~

Just like the aboriginal Nobama, you only accept that part of law that pleases you... how fucking two rfaced are you? You just love it when scotus supports your sick ideology of sacrificing all to the greater good of the fucking state...

idiots

amicus
 
In this think tank, I've neither tipped my hand to which way I lean. But, your statement only said to me that you reject or accept which law your gender chooses to follow.

I find that absurd. You can agree or disagree. But it's folks like you, on either side, that scare the shit out of me.



Is it Happy Hour yet?:cool:

When SCOTUS rules against a specific law that targets men's healthcare rights, then you might have a leg to stand on. What you and many others don't get is that birth control is not only about contraception but other health issues, and it is not always a matter of paying $9 for a pack of pills. This ruling is not about religious liberty. It is blatant misogyny.
 
~~~~


all three females dissented from the majority opinion, reinforcing my concept that women should never have been given the right to vote.

women are sexists, not a logical bone in their fat little bodies...

amicunt the dim man... eheh

Amicunt hates the federal government, but would be sucking dick for table scraps if he didn't get his two government checks each month.
 
They just created a shit storm. In their delusion, they think women will just roll over and beg for more because they still think women and their bodies are theirs to rule over.

~~~

No one, not a single soul, gives a ratsass about your fat, uigly little body, bitch, it is nature that enable you to create life, you know, life... that fundamnetal value of allhuman exist3ence that you so easily piss away?

dumb fucking cunts should never ever have been allowed to participate in the grown up world
\
amicus
 
In this think tank, I've neither tipped my hand to which way I lean. But, your statement only said to me that you reject or accept which law your gender chooses to follow.

I find that absurd. You can agree or disagree. But it's folks like you, on either side, that scare the shit out of me.



Is it Happy Hour yet?:cool:

She probably meant with our votes. Not that she was going to force Hobby Lobby to cover bc while holding a gun to their heads.

Because, we you still buy guns freely but not birth control or at least that's where we are headed.
 
When SCOTUS rules against a specific law that targets men's healthcare rights, then you might have a leg to stand on. What you and many others don't get is that birth control is not only about contraception but other health issues, and it is not always a matter of paying $9 for a pack of pills. This ruling is not about religious liberty. It is blatant misogyny.

~~~

How fucking predictiable.... it was all said right out in the open, the left, having no other arguement, would call this decision another aspect of the ,
'war against women', you dumb shit, this is and has always been about the right to life...

finally, a small victory for humanity, and do listen to the bleating whining of the anti life groups

my oh fucking my...

amicus
 
~~~

No one, not a single soul, gives a ratsass about your fat, uigly little body, bitch, it is nature that enable you to create life, you know, life... that fundamnetal value of allhuman exist3ence that you so easily piss away?

dumb fucking cunts should never ever have been allowed to participate in the grown up world
\
amicus

You are an ass.

Speaking of my body, I may be 60, but I look pretty damn good for my age. I doubt you can say the same thing about your body. And no, I'm not little. I'm 5'8". Probably taller than you. :)
 
Back
Top