Study Shows Vaxxed Kids Have Greater Risk Of Autism

[Rightguide]

So you don't believe that vaccines cause autism based on the study you posted. Is that your assertion?

See you can't do it because I did no such thing. You are a liar, plain and simple. So much so that if lying was an Olympic sport you could replenish the missing gold in Fort Knox.

 

[DeluxAuto]

See you can't do it because I did no such thing. You are a liar, plain and simple. So much so that if lying was an Olympic sport you could replenish the missing gold in Fort Knox.

You can only win one gold per sport in the Olympics, dipshit.

 

[ll74]

See you can't do it because I did no such thing.

The question is to you.

You are a liar, plain and simple. So much so that if lying was an Olympic sport you could replenish the missing gold in Fort Knox.

You haven't answered.

 

[DeluxAuto]

He, Rob, and others are intellectual cowards they live in that fortress of glass, fragile yet fiercely guarded, where cowards take refuge from the arrows of truth. Theirs is a suicide mission, the escape and evasion of uncomfortable realities.

How's your election fraud threads and pet eating going?

You're an intellectual midget.

 

[Lance_Castro]

Poor Rob.

 

[Rightguide]

The question is to you.


You haven't answered.

It was my question of your assertion that you never answered.

 

[Rightguide]

Easy peasy!
I can give you step-by-step PROOF!
Start by click this URL: https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com then follow these three easy step!

1. Press Control-U. This will display the source code page.
2. Press Control-F to open the "Find" window. Enter "SameAs" in the search bar.
3. Press ENTER

Woo hoo!
https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com is actually an alias of http://publichealthpolicyjournal.wordpress.com.
(Click the blue link to see for yourself so won't embarrass yourself by replying your usual "Nuh Uh!").

This shows us that Wordpress is hosting this site on their servers and the site is using a Wordpress blog template to display data.

Specifically, it looks like a modified version of the common Woocommerce storefront website template.

Lots of premium user tracker plug-ins installed...this site REALLY wants to analyze visitors!

I can see how you were fooled into believing that this is not a Wordpress site...The owners have removed the "Powered by Wordpress" verbiage typically found at the bottom of these Wordpress blogs...they wanna look professional, y'know?

Tilting at windmills again. So how does all of the above detract from the fact that the subject was a peer-reviewed study?

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Tilting at windmills again. So how does all of the above detract from the fact that the subject was a peer-reviewed study?

By whom? Do you think there is just one Peer-review group?

 

[RobDownSouth]

Tilting at windmills again. So how does all of the above detract from the fact that the subject was a peer-reviewed study?

Please forgive me, I honestly thought you were confused as to how to recognize a Wordpress blog site from others.
I answered a direct question with a direct answer, and you didn't like the answer so you are once again whining.

I can see now you were simply trying to distract everyone from your absolute failure to address their concerns over the shoddy research in the "peer reviewed" study you seem so enamored of today.

 

[HisArpy]

By whom? Do you think there is just one Peer-review group?

Does it matter which peer group did the review?

Or are you hoping to smear the group as an attack to discredit the FACTS in the report?

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Does it matter which peer group did the review?

Yes it kind of does.

Or are you hoping to smear the group as an attack to discredit the FACTS in the report?

Nope, I took a peak at the study, have you?

 

[Rightguide]

Please forgive me, I honestly thought you were confused as to how to recognize a Wordpress blog site from others.
I answered a direct question with a direct answer, and you didn't like the answer so you are once again whining.

I can see now you were simply trying to distract everyone from your absolute failure to address their concerns over the shoddy research in the "peer reviewed" study you seem so enamored of today.

It's your craven refusal to venture beyond the well-lit corridors of your own superstitions that always bring these conversations to their inevitable dead end.

 

[HisArpy]

Yes it kind of does.

Nope, I took a peak at the study, have you?

I peak. You peeked. There's a difference even someone as fucking moronic as you are should be able to understand beyond the tenses.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

I peak. You peeked. There's a difference even someone as fucking moronic as you are should be able to understand beyond the tenses.

If you peaked, then how many web links did you go through to find the study was based on 54 un-vaccinated vs 10,642 vaccinated children?

Which Carbon Water Boy, does not meet the statistical requirements to be a valid comparator.

 

[HisArpy]

If you peaked, then how many web links did you go through to find the study was based on 54 un-vaccinated vs 10,642 vaccinated children?

Which Carbon Water Boy, does not meet the statistical requirements to be a valid comparator.

Peak = ascend to height.

Peek = secretly looking under women's skirts.

Which one of us did which?

 

[ll74]

It was my question of your assertion that you never answered.

You haven't answered for your original position.

From the Op information, what is your assertion?

You giving me a study is fine.
It does not change whether vaccines and autism are connected in any way.
So what do you get from the study you posted?

You spend more time insinuating your bullshit without admitting your position than most everyone here

 

[Rightguide]

You haven't answered for your original position.

From the Op information, what is your assertion?

You giving me a study is fine.
It does not change whether vaccines and autism are connected in any way.
So what do you get from the study you posted?

You spend more time insinuating your bullshit without admitting your position than most everyone here

You lie so often even your memories need to be fact checked.

 

[Politruk]

Tilting at windmills again. So how does all of the above detract from the fact that the subject was a peer-reviewed study?

In what peer-reviewed journal was it published? Peer review does not happen in any other setting but evaluation of a paper for publication.

 

[HisArpy]

In what peer-reviewed journal was it published?

^ so slow that even last weeks news hasn't reached him yet.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Peak = ascend to height.

Peek = secretly looking under women's skirts.

Which one of us did which?

Sorry about that. Not sure why, I was on a web meeting, it should be peek. A win for HisArpy!!

 

[Lance_Castro]

Anyone here consider the CDC a good authority?

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/about/autism.html

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Anyone here consider the CDC a good authority?

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/about/autism.html

With the RWCJ? Surely you jest.

 

[jomar]

Anyone here consider the CDC a good authority?

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/about/autism.html

Not if they don’t tow the party line

 

[Politruk]

In what peer-reviewed journal was it published? Peer review does not happen in any other setting but evaluation of a paper for publication.

The article linked in the OP cites no source but something called "Science, Public Health Policy and the Law" -- which exists but is obviously not a peer-reviewed scientific journal. The article includes an approving quote from Children's Health Defense:

Children's Health Defense (CHD) is an American 501(c)(3) nonprofit activist group mainly known for anti-vaccine misinformation, and which has been called one of the main sources of misinformation on vaccines.[1][2][3][4][5] Founded as World Mercury Project in 2007 by Eric Gladen, it was chaired by lawyer Robert F. Kennedy Jr. from 2015 to 2023.[6]

The group has been campaigning against various public health programs, such as vaccination and fluoridation of drinking water.[7] The group has been contributing to vaccine hesitancy in the United States, encouraging citizens and legislators to support anti-vaccine regulations and legislation,[8][9] although arguments against vaccination are contradicted by general scientific consensus.[10][11][12][13]

 

[HisArpy]

The article linked in the OP cites no source but something called "Science, Public Health Policy and the Law" -- which exists but is obviously not a peer-reviewed scientific journal. The article includes an approving quote from Children's Health Defense:

Children's Health Defense (CHD) is an American 501(c)(3) nonprofit activist group mainly known for anti-vaccine misinformation, and which has been called one of the main sources of misinformation on vaccines.[1][2][3][4][5] Founded as World Mercury Project in 2007 by Eric Gladen, it was chaired by lawyer Robert F. Kennedy Jr. from 2015 to 2023.[6]

The group has been campaigning against various public health programs, such as vaccination and fluoridation of drinking water.[7] The group has been contributing to vaccine hesitancy in the United States, encouraging citizens and legislators to support anti-vaccine regulations and legislation,[8][9] although arguments against vaccination are contradicted by general scientific consensus.[10][11][12][13]

So you manged to figure it out on your ownsies after all...