LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Swimsuits!

ck30101 said:
Yeah... zerogpt, isgen.ai, aiphotocheck, deepai.org, undetectable.ai, aiseo, isthisai.com, sightengine.com and isitai.com all have it as 96% or higher Ai.

The Metadata shows c2pa, which is an Ai signature. If the photo isnt Ai, then it has been edited by Ai.View attachment 2641906
Click to expand...
Don’t read the forum for one day and all hell breaks loose.


My two cents after downloading and looking at the files with no outside assistance.


Original posted Photo in question


It is a JPG File, 5 tags, No C2PA present, No GPT Present. This is a direct read of the meta data. The 5 tags are all simple housekeeping for Exif.


CK30101 Screen Shot of his test


His is a PNG File, 47 tags, C2PA Present, GPT shown. He had an app do the read, so he isn’t saying he directly read the meta data from the file. File may have been converted from JPG to PNG but given that he says this is the same file, picking up 42 tags and the gpt-image information is not normal. I can’t think of any way it happened except some software or SOMEONE added this information. Well, maybe these are not the same file. That would explain it.


Both are still posted and both can be compared so no point in beating a dead horse.


MCA-256 not matching. Impossible if CK30101 has the same file. Maybe he converted from JPG to PNG back to JPG, that would give a different fingerprint, but why?


This is not adding up.


The only explanation that makes sense is that someone is trying to win an argument by any means possible. Why else would you say there is meta data in a file that isn’t there, when anyone can open it up and look?
 
Last edited:
ck30101 said:
I have had multiple moderators thank me for what I do.
Click to expand...

Not saying that you’re lying, but name one. I’ll bet I can get your ass booted off here by showing the shit you pulled in this thread to the moderators. You are absolutely using a different file and I don’t think for a minute that is an accident. Did you not think anyone would notice the difference or you just think you can explain it all away?
 
ck30101 said:
Yeah... zerogpt, isgen.ai, aiphotocheck, deepai.org, undetectable.ai, aiseo, isthisai.com, sightengine.com and isitai.com all have it as 96% or higher Ai.
Click to expand...

I’ll just start and verify these one at a time this morning because your honesty is very much in question, I’d look outside to check if you told me the sun came up this morning.



…..erased quite a bit after discovering file change.

Well, I’ll be damned. This wasn’t a total waste of time after all. I just found out how all of that meta data is getting put in there. You aren’t a fraud after all. Just an asshole. Let me work on this for a while. This isn’t going to be easy to explain, but it’s definatley there. Maybe I didn’t discover how exactly but saw it happen in real time and I didn’t do it.

….

I need to contact one of the companies on your list because if I say something that turns out to be wrong the shit is going to hit the fan. My file has the meta deta in it now and it wasn’t there before. I have run a couple of tests with some snapshots and every one of them was changed with similar but different meta data. It doesn’t make sense…I can’t even think of a way that it got there. All uploading, no downloading. The file is different but no change in the time stamp. Weird.
 
Last edited:
This has taken a turn.

gettin to the stage its hardly worthwhile looking at pics and commenting as they may be fake?

Or now may not be fake?

Know nothing about AI but il keep an eye on this to see if i can learn something new to save me ditching this forum
 
KarenS1975 said:
I’ll just start and verify these one at a time this morning because your honesty is very much in question, I’d look outside to check if you told me the sun came up this morning.

Your first claim. ZeroGPt was the first of a long list of detectors you claim gave you a 96% or higher AI probability.

FACT: You are a liar. I just got back from zeroGPT and it is only capable of TEXT. No image identification whatsoever. I’ll be back after I check the next one. Why do I feel like I’m wasting my time?
Click to expand...
I do not know much about AI and how to create it or manipulate it.
But I do know how to use google and most websites with some basic menus and links.
So in your language:

FACT: You are a liar (or an idiot).
https://www.zerogpt.com/ai-image-detector
 
KarenS1975 said:
Not saying that you’re lying, but name one. I’ll bet I can get your ass booted off here by showing the shit you pulled in this thread to the moderators. You are absolutely using a different file and I don’t think for a minute that is an accident. Did you not think anyone would notice the difference or you just think you can explain it all away?
Click to expand...
First off, go fuck yourself. My whole purpose here is to expose the frauds. To even suggest that I faked any of this shit is ridiculous.

Second, you kind of showed your ass when you said zero didn't have image detection. Tried to sound smart and shit the bed there. Feel free to run the picture through any of those detectors and tell me if I'm wrong.

Third, @barefootgirl69 can vouch for me.

Fourth, look at the close up from her picture that i posted, or just zoom in on your own. Are you going to seriously tell me that isnt Ai?

Fifth, again go fuck yourself. I only do this shit to try to protect people on here. I know people that have been scammed here by the fake accounts. People like you that have 30 posts in 15 years giving me a hard time about this are the real problem.
 
Last edited:
JordynRose said:
Anyone, please share why AI imagery is considered corrupt or not acceptable forms of art, like the manufactured stories we have posted for others to enjoy?
Click to expand...

It's not acceptable because the Literotica owners say it is not acceptable. Stories get kicked back if AI is detected. Blurring a tattoo for safety reasons, fixing a blemish - that isn't AI. Anything else just to enhance things is catfishing. This forum is for amateurs to post themselves.
KarenS1975 said:
Not saying that you’re lying, but name one. I’ll bet I can get your ass booted off here by showing the shit you pulled in this thread to the moderators. You are absolutely using a different file and I don’t think for a minute that is an accident. Did you not think anyone would notice the difference or you just think you can explain it all away?
Click to expand...

Hi, Karen. I'm bfg. I'm one of those moderators who appreciate all the work he's done in pointing out fakes, catfish, and people who steal other's images. He's one of a few that we ask to check things regularly.

Just thought I'd introduce myself.
 
Since you’re a mod, maybe consider putting this “rule” Literotica has about AI usage and how anyone is supposed to know it’s being used or not, into writing on the site.
If covering a blemish or tattoo isn’t AI, then why when I run my wife’s picture that I took, and then manipulated myself to guard against anyone somehow IDing her, do these sites say the pic is now 95% fake! So what are we supposed to do? Hope this ONE guy doesn’t happen across our pics and decide to narc us out the the ONE mod he knows? What?! Even if Literotica has an entire army of narcs on the site, then why does no one seem to know about this supposed “rule” about AI usage? I even literally asked about this once in a different forum. About using AI outright to make pictures involving my wife that weren’t real at all, and the answer was a rousing “I don’t know” from anyone that bothered to respond.
Look, if someone got screwed by someone selling their amateur pics or something (I’m not even sure what you’re referring to here) then ban them and move on. But where’s the rule? Where’s the big blazing list of policy changes since AI started really infiltrating everyday use?
I’m sorry, none of this stuff makes any sense at all.
 
Last edited:
As a member, it's up to you to read and become familiar with the Terms and Rules. The link is found at the bottom of every forum page, and isn't hard to find.

Getting pissed off at one guy who HAS familiarized himself and chooses to make others aware of things says more about you than him.

As for "your wife" - who's to say you have consent to publish her photos on the internet, let alone here on Literotica? All we have is your word for that, but no definitive proof - and I really don’t care enough to deal with getting it deleted.

The point is there's a time and place for everything, and @ck30101 doesn't say or do anything unless there's some reason to look into it. He's not nitpicking, he's not trolling, not being hateful to any one member - I wouldn't respect his reports if he was that way.

I'm not going to name other moderators, because they aren't online atm to pop in. But, if you've got a problem with the rules, take it up with the owners. I only enforce within the perimeters they give me.
 
I read the rules. They are clear for text and writing. They are not clear for altering your own pictures to provide privacy for example. Can you show me that part? And I LOVE that the first thing you did was to attack me, and assume I’m using my wife’s picture without her consent. It was HER idea, and she’s sitting right here. You want her phone number? DM me.
 
KarenS1975 said:
Don’t read the forum for one day and all hell breaks loose.


My two cents after downloading and looking at the files with no outside assistance.


Original posted Photo in question


It is a JPG File, 5 tags, No C2PA present, No GPT Present. This is a direct read of the meta data. The 5 tags are all simple housekeeping for Exif.


CK30101 Screen Shot of his test


His is a PNG File, 47 tags, C2PA Present, GPT shown. He had an app do the read, so he isn’t saying he directly read the meta data from the file. File may have been converted from JPG to PNG but given that he says this is the same file, picking up 42 tags and the gpt-image information is not normal. I can’t think of any way it happened except some software or SOMEONE added this information. Well, maybe these are not the same file. That would explain it.


Both are still posted and both can be compared so no point in beating a dead horse.


MCA-256 not matching. Impossible if CK30101 has the same file. Maybe he converted from JPG to PNG back to JPG, that would give a different fingerprint, but why?
Click to expand...
So I am a liar that manipulated things? What does the file name above the photo say?

Calling me a liar while you are completely making things up makes it seem like one of these 2 is the alt for the other account and you are trying to BS your way through this for anyone that isnt actually paying attention.
1000033086.jpg

Sorry everyone for derailing the thread.
 
BBWLover4U1973 said:
I read the rules. They are clear for text and writing. They are not clear for altering your own pictures to provide privacy for example. Can you show me that part? And I LOVE that the first thing you did was to attack me, and assume I’m using my wife’s picture without her consent. It was HER idea, and she’s sitting right here. You want her phone number? DM me.
Click to expand...
Anything that applies to the written side of Literotica applies to photos. It's written in there somewhere.

I did not attack you. I pointed something out that most people get asked, "are you sure you have consent?" I really don't care, as I stated before.
 
barefootgirl69 said:
Anything that applies to the written side of Literotica applies to photos. It's written in there somewhere.

I did not attack you. I pointed something out that most people get asked, "are you sure you have consent?" I really don't care, as I stated before.
Click to expand...
My wife in quotes and accusing me of posting her pics without her consent but then, luckily for me, you don’t have the time to look into it. Right. That’s not a thinly veiled threat to get me banned at all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

pilotguy123
Bikini/swimsuit picks… let’s bring back the summer early
Replies
3
Views
625
pilotguy123
pilotguy123
Sue_Render
Hidden gems!
2 3
Replies
52
Views
3K
crashD
crashD
P
Little pic update thread....
Replies
6
Views
292
patrick_cf
P
ShelbiVigdis
Shelbi's Sanctuary
8 9 10
Replies
246
Views
21K
Olderwiserstillhorny
Olderwiserstillhorny
T
Neck and Shoulder appriciation thread
Replies
13
Views
1K
MarilynMonroeFan
MarilynMonroeFan
Back
Top