Teach Me Then

Toddles, don't make me spank you.

If you look around, you'll see that EVERYONE who posts politically gets flamed. That includes Me, WriterDom, shadowsource, Cheyenne, lavender, miles, Thumper, PC, Closet Desire, and on and on.

Politics are an emotional topic. You post almost exclusively about politics. Ergo, it seems like you're constantly being flamed. Does this mean you shouldn't post about politics? Of course not. Post about whatever you want to post. But understand that no matter what post you make politically, half the board will flame you.

Someone said (KM maybe?) that this board was mostly atheists and liberals. I disagree. I think it's a microcosm of society, and it's pretty evenly split. At least half of the regulars in political discussions are conservative to some degree, the other half are liberal. Of the folks who stay out of the the political threads, I'd say that the same holds true. The median age, I'd say, for a poster is above 30. Most have kids. The non-sexual discussions here tend to be (no offense) fairly mainstream, and whenever the sexual discussions veer off the "accepted" path, you hear "ooh, gross!" Check any Incest thread. Check any Fetish thread.

I do read ultra-liberal boards - as well as wandering over to hardcore right wing places like Free Republic every now and then - and I tell ya, this place is neither. I think it's well-balanced, with particpants on each side. The problem with this is that if half the board is peach jelly and half is grape, those who hate grape are going to bitch because about the peach. But life isn't all one flavor. Doesn't mean you have to learn to love peach - you don't have to eat it at all - but you have to let those who do like peach enjoy it. Wishing it off the planet is narrow-minded and unfair.

What was I talking about? Oh yeah, Todd and jelly. Anyhow, go make yourself a peanut butter and jelly sandwich and a tall glass of milk and relax. Then decide what's more important to you: getting your ideas across or being liked. If the former is important, then keep on getting politically involved. If persuading people to your view is important to you, then work on making your argument less...argumentative and more provocative. Though I disagree with you on nearly every issue ;) , I respect the fact that you care. Most people don't, unfortunately. If being liked is more important, then post on joke threads. Just quit yer bitchin, eh? ;)

Buck up lil camper! Things are gonna go your way...
 
Laurel said:
What was I talking about? Oh yeah, Todd and jelly. Anyhow, go make yourself a peanut butter and jelly sandwich and a tall glass of milk and relax.

Hey Laurel,

I just ate two of 'em. One PB and Strawberry and One PB and grape. How about them apples, er strawberries er grapes?

LOL
 
Chuckus said:


Hey Laurel,

I just ate two of 'em. One PB and Strawberry and One PB and grape. How about them apples, er strawberries er grapes?

LOL


:eek: I just got eaten and didn't notice?!?!

PB = PacificBlue get it! ha, ha, ha


alright...I'm getting a life!
 
Laurel said:
The problem with this is that if half the board is peach jelly and half is grape...
Ooh! Can I be a peach? Pretty please?
 
Mischka:
"Ooh! Can I be a peach? Pretty please? "


I knew a girl from Georgia who was always telling me I was a peach.
 
Hhhhmmm...

Todd, the reason I typically don't put my 2 cents in at your threads is because they are typically sooooooo long and wordy. I have a hard time muddling through after I come home braindead from work.

(I know, I know--my own posts tend to be too wordy too. I think it is because of the same reason--I can't keep a genuinely coherent thought going and still translate it into the three-hundred word limit that I like to read.)
 
My Thoughts

I think I am usually a pretty rational person. I'm not much on flaming people and I try to give everyone the benefit of the doubt.

My thoughts here, in your case, Todd, are if we tell you what to post..why will you need to be here? If we have things to say and subjects we want to broach, we'll post it ourselves.

Anyone who is here for any amount of time will be told at one point or another that someone doesn't like what they post about, the "tone of voice" they used or that their spelling or grammar sucks ass. (not that mine ever has, BTW:))

If you are a person who is so thin skinned as to let a group of people tell you what to post and when to post it, well, you are in sad shape.

Buck up, make this place fun for you and ignore what people think. It's been my experience that if people only knew half as much as they thought they did, they'd be geniuses.

I think, in closing, that my point is that you need to decide what you are here for. Are you here to win affection and approval from the "Royal Untouchables" or are you here to have a good time? If you answer isn't the latter, it's time to get out.
 
WriterDom said:
Nope, peaches are the red states. You can be acid rain though.
Did I miss something? What does acid rain have to do with jelly flavors? And what are "red states"?

Yours in confusion,

Mischka
 
But we all live in a yellow submarine -

and Todd is the captain: "Full speed ahead!"
 
lavender said:
The red states (those in the so called-heartland) are those who voted for Bush.

aka The Flyover states. When they show those maps, they should also show population density. Acres of abandoned desert are painted red, and L.A. with its millions of actual people voting is painted blue. So that's like 24 coyotes given the weight of 1 million people.
 
Um, no I don't think they do. We have a representative voting system based on population. That why when Gore has Mass, Michigan and Florida the game was (supposedly) over.
 
An electoral college is representative voting Laurel, they represent the voters.
 
Yes and no. If it's possible to get more votes and lose the election, then it's not based entirely on population.

stepping out quickly before the Electoral College flaming begins
 
Ok, Todd, you've now mentioned me twice in a good manor. If I didn't know any better I'd say I've renewed your spirit for religious discussion.

Now, seeingas how I don't agree on your theory for the Knights Templar, how about I give you mine. They were tried for heresy and being a secret organization and their confessions bear out that they preached that Jesus was but a man, not God. Now, knowing that they started as a team of priests excavating Solomon's Temple, and that the Jews hid things under it before its destrutcion around 70AD, I think that maybe they found something out that would pretty much ruin the foundations of Christianity. So, what if Jesus really was only a man, and that the Messiah will only be a King in the sense that he frees Israel once and for all?
 
Back
Top