Tell me something...

Ekserb said:
Hmm ... after reading this I had to go back and find where I put you down, but couldn't locate the post. Was it this post?

To the contrary, I find your sarcasm quite pleasing, and we see eye to eye on a few (not all) topics.

I have given your thread a cursory look and while I didn't add any thoughts of my own (I don't think I have to explain that) I did find a few pictures I liked. I tend to post comments to picture threads when the photos are of unusually high quality, and it rarely has anything to do with the subject. I've seen really hot images of really overweight women, and really shitty pictures of models. I'd avoid the model pictures for that reason. (I would not, however, avoid a model thread if the pictures were really well done. I'm not stupid, just picky.)

Maybe you're right and I'd shit myself if I read through some of the posts on your thread, but that shouldn't reflect on you - it should only reflect my disdain for your readers' comments.

The insults were in the "Hottest Women" thread. <shrug> Not that it matters.

If you have the time to give me constructive criticism on my pictures, I'd appreciate it. You can do it on the thread or via PM so as not to waste everyone else's time here. I take the pictures myself using the timer on a very rudimentary camera, but I do put thought into them and have been learning as I go along. On the other hand, I know it takes time to write out a critique of anything, and that includes amateur erotica, so it's no problem if you don't bother.
 
monique1971 said:
The insults were in the "Hottest Women" thread. <shrug> Not that it matters.

Oh, yeah. "Your mother." Was that insulting? LOL ... come on. I was WAY more insulting to Pookies and DaddysAngel23.

Speaking of DaddysAngel23, she still writes me and I can tell she's in love. On the surface it looks like she prays for my death, but I can read the subtle undertones of lust.

monique1971 said:
If you have the time to give me constructive criticism on my pictures, I'd appreciate it. You can do it on the thread or via PM so as not to waste everyone else's time here. I take the pictures myself using the timer on a very rudimentary camera, but I do put thought into them and have been learning as I go along. On the other hand, I know it takes time to write out a critique of anything, and that includes amateur erotica, so it's no problem if you don't bother.

I'll do it, but only if you promise to not take anything I say personally. If I make a critique of a picture it's only to point out where I think it could have been better technically or how it could have been more flattering. I'm not an expert, but I let my work speak for itself.

Deal?
 
my gram thinks she can yell at a cat...TYLER BEHAVE!!...GET THE FUCK OFF THE TABLE...Tyler this...Tyler that...cats dont listen...they never do...TYLER GO LAY DOWN...thats my favorite
 
desired_tempest said:
my gram thinks she can yell at a cat...TYLER BEHAVE!!...GET THE FUCK OFF THE TABLE...Tyler this...Tyler that...cats dont listen...they never do...TYLER GO LAY DOWN...thats my favorite

Every day when I come home, my cat escapes out the front door and settles on the lawn to eat some delicious grass. I pick him up and try to explain to him that he is an inside cat, but he just doesn't seem to understand.
 
Lorali82 said:
Every day when I come home, my cat escapes out the front door and settles on the lawn to eat some delicious grass. I pick him up and try to explain to him that he is an inside cat, but he just doesn't seem to understand.

I solved this problem myself by waiting for a rainy day. As soon as the cat rushed out, I shut the door. After ten minutes out there ...

Well it worked of a couple of weeks. She got me back by tripping me up on the stairs
 
desired_tempest said:
my gram thinks she can yell at a cat...TYLER BEHAVE!!...GET THE FUCK OFF THE TABLE...Tyler this...Tyler that...cats dont listen...they never do...TYLER GO LAY DOWN...thats my favorite
I yell at my cat
and call her two
most of the time she ignores me, but if I ask: want some treats?
she'll come running :rolleyes:

and hey tempest
having a good day?
 
i'll tell yall something...i hate it when guys look at me like im naked when im not getting naked...that make sense...i dont like it when people give me lewd looks...hate it hate it hate it
 
Last edited:
desired_tempest said:
i'll yell yall something...i hate it when guys look at me like im naked when im not getting naked...that make sense...i dont like it when people give me lewd looks...hate it hate it hate it

*drools at DT as she walks around fully clothed*


:p
 
i think i just had the worst phone sex ever...i didnt even cum...he didnt even last two mins...WTF
now im horny...
 
desired_tempest said:
i think i just had the worst phone sex ever...i didnt even cum...he didnt even last two mins...WTF
now im horny...
you arnt the only one. i woke up honier than i have in years
 
desired_tempest said:
i'll tell yall something...i hate it when guys look at me like im naked when im not getting naked...that make sense...i dont like it when people give me lewd looks...hate it hate it hate it

I never get lewd looks. I don't know if I hate this or not. Sometimes it would be nice to be noticed, and other times I like being able to go out my business.

I'm not fishing for compliments, by the way. Just saying.
 
Women in the military

Here's a topic that usually stirs a fire or two: Women in the military.

Let me go out on a limb here and say that men and women are not equal and never will be, but the reason that women should not be allowed to fight alongside men in the military isn't because they can't do as many push-ups or run as fast (which they can't, but we'll get to that in a minute). It's because men are different when there's a woman in the mix.

If you've never been in the military, this won't mean much, but trust me when I say that a group of male soldiers is generally a cohesive fighting unit. They are each willing and able to fight as a team and they depend on one another for protection and to provide all the necessary skills that may be required for the fight at hand.

When you take a female and inject her into a military unit, you no longer have a team of soldiers, you have a group of men who are going to look out for the girl. This is just human nature and it happens all the time. Either each guy thinks he has to be the hero, or for whatever reason a few of them think she isn't supposed to be there, or maybe one or two get the idea that if they protect her a little bit more than they would protect their brother soldiers that she will appreciate the help and show him a little lovin'.

None of those reasons have anything to do with the woman being of lesser physical conditioning or ability - they are all because men are different around women. Hell, I've seen it on these boards - when you insult a woman here, all the men that have been sucking up to her all jump in to attack, even if she didn't ask for the help. That's how guys are. (And some women, too.)

Of course, there are exceptions. Well, I suppose there are, but I never saw it in eight years in the Army.

Now on to the physical reasons for not having the women serving with the men. Women aren't as strong as a man. Period. The physical requirements for female recruits are much less than those for the men. They don't have to do as many sit-ups or push-ups, nor do they have to run as fast. These are the military standards I'm talking about.

There are feminine requirements that the men don't have to worry about. When a unit deploys to the field for training, the female soldiers are allowed to drive or fly back to the rear area to take care of their dirty pussies while the men have to stay in the field with little or no sanitation other than a pit toilet and three squares of toilet paper. What do you think this does to the morale of the men when they see the girls hopping off a truck all clean and shiny while they are forced to sleep in dirt for a month at a time?

And finally my biggest pet fucking peeve: How come these women aren't required to sign up for the Selective Service (the draft)? If the fucking liberals want a military made up of men and women and that reflects what the American military should strive to be, why not get everybody in on the action when it comes to time to draft every able-bodied citizen for military service? "Oh, no! We can't have the girls getting drafted to war!!" Why fucking not?!?

Want to know what I'd do? Open up the Selective Service to everybody and put the women on the front lines in all combat units and job descriptions, but require them to also maintain the same physical standards so that your sons will be able to rely on the women to carry them out of a firefight without having to call for help.

It's nice to be in the military and not see anyone as black or white or Indian or Swedish, but this same standard of non-discrimnation has to applied across the sexes, too.
 
Ekserb said:
Oh, yeah. "Your mother." Was that insulting? LOL ... come on. I was WAY more insulting to Pookies and DaddysAngel23.

Speaking of DaddysAngel23, she still writes me and I can tell she's in love. On the surface it looks like she prays for my death, but I can read the subtle undertones of lust.



I'll do it, but only if you promise to not take anything I say personally. If I make a critique of a picture it's only to point out where I think it could have been better technically or how it could have been more flattering. I'm not an expert, but I let my work speak for itself.

Deal?


You could never insult me. I'd have to give a crap about you first. :D
Oh, and just for the record...I wouldn't fuck you. :D
 
Ekserb said:
Here's a topic that usually stirs a fire or two: Women in the military.

Let me go out on a limb here and say that men and women are not equal and never will be, but the reason that women should not be allowed to fight alongside men in the military isn't because they can't do as many push-ups or run as fast (which they can't, but we'll get to that in a minute). It's because men are different when there's a woman in the mix.

If you've never been in the military, this won't mean much, but trust me when I say that a group of male soldiers is generally a cohesive fighting unit. They are each willing and able to fight as a team and they depend on one another for protection and to provide all the necessary skills that may be required for the fight at hand.

When you take a female and inject her into a military unit, you no longer have a team of soldiers, you have a group of men who are going to look out for the girl. This is just human nature and it happens all the time. Either each guy thinks he has to be the hero, or for whatever reason a few of them think she isn't supposed to be there, or maybe one or two get the idea that if they protect her a little bit more than they would protect their brother soldiers that she will appreciate the help and show him a little lovin'.

None of those reasons have anything to do with the woman being of lesser physical conditioning or ability - they are all because men are different around women. Hell, I've seen it on these boards - when you insult a woman here, all the men that have been sucking up to her all jump in to attack, even if she didn't ask for the help. That's how guys are. (And some women, too.)

Of course, there are exceptions. Well, I suppose there are, but I never saw it in eight years in the Army.

Now on to the physical reasons for not having the women serving with the men. Women aren't as strong as a man. Period. The physical requirements for female recruits are much less than those for the men. They don't have to do as many sit-ups or push-ups, nor do they have to run as fast. These are the military standards I'm talking about.

There are feminine requirements that the men don't have to worry about. When a unit deploys to the field for training, the female soldiers are allowed to drive or fly back to the rear area to take care of their dirty pussies while the men have to stay in the field with little or no sanitation other than a pit toilet and three squares of toilet paper. What do you think this does to the morale of the men when they see the girls hopping off a truck all clean and shiny while they are forced to sleep in dirt for a month at a time?

And finally my biggest pet fucking peeve: How come these women aren't required to sign up for the Selective Service (the draft)? If the fucking liberals want a military made up of men and women and that reflects what the American military should strive to be, why not get everybody in on the action when it comes to time to draft every able-bodied citizen for military service? "Oh, no! We can't have the girls getting drafted to war!!" Why fucking not?!?

Want to know what I'd do? Open up the Selective Service to everybody and put the women on the front lines in all combat units and job descriptions, but require them to also maintain the same physical standards so that your sons will be able to rely on the women to carry them out of a firefight without having to call for help.

It's nice to be in the military and not see anyone as black or white or Indian or Swedish, but this same standard of non-discrimnation has to applied across the sexes, too.


Oh dear god...help me..I actualy agree with you on something... :eek:
 
Ekserb said:
Here's a topic that usually stirs a fire or two: Women in the military.

Let me go out on a limb here and say that men and women are not equal and never will be, but the reason that women should not be allowed to fight alongside men in the military isn't because they can't do as many push-ups or run as fast (which they can't, but we'll get to that in a minute). It's because men are different when there's a woman in the mix.

If you've never been in the military, this won't mean much, but trust me when I say that a group of male soldiers is generally a cohesive fighting unit. They are each willing and able to fight as a team and they depend on one another for protection and to provide all the necessary skills that may be required for the fight at hand.

When you take a female and inject her into a military unit, you no longer have a team of soldiers, you have a group of men who are going to look out for the girl. This is just human nature and it happens all the time. Either each guy thinks he has to be the hero, or for whatever reason a few of them think she isn't supposed to be there, or maybe one or two get the idea that if they protect her a little bit more than they would protect their brother soldiers that she will appreciate the help and show him a little lovin'.

None of those reasons have anything to do with the woman being of lesser physical conditioning or ability - they are all because men are different around women. Hell, I've seen it on these boards - when you insult a woman here, all the men that have been sucking up to her all jump in to attack, even if she didn't ask for the help. That's how guys are. (And some women, too.)

Of course, there are exceptions. Well, I suppose there are, but I never saw it in eight years in the Army.

Now on to the physical reasons for not having the women serving with the men. Women aren't as strong as a man. Period. The physical requirements for female recruits are much less than those for the men. They don't have to do as many sit-ups or push-ups, nor do they have to run as fast. These are the military standards I'm talking about.

There are feminine requirements that the men don't have to worry about. When a unit deploys to the field for training, the female soldiers are allowed to drive or fly back to the rear area to take care of their dirty pussies while the men have to stay in the field with little or no sanitation other than a pit toilet and three squares of toilet paper. What do you think this does to the morale of the men when they see the girls hopping off a truck all clean and shiny while they are forced to sleep in dirt for a month at a time?

And finally my biggest pet fucking peeve: How come these women aren't required to sign up for the Selective Service (the draft)? If the fucking liberals want a military made up of men and women and that reflects what the American military should strive to be, why not get everybody in on the action when it comes to time to draft every able-bodied citizen for military service? "Oh, no! We can't have the girls getting drafted to war!!" Why fucking not?!?

Want to know what I'd do? Open up the Selective Service to everybody and put the women on the front lines in all combat units and job descriptions, but require them to also maintain the same physical standards so that your sons will be able to rely on the women to carry them out of a firefight without having to call for help.

It's nice to be in the military and not see anyone as black or white or Indian or Swedish, but this same standard of non-discrimnation has to applied across the sexes, too.

I absolutely agree with you that everyone should have to adhere to the same physical requirements regardless of sex. Set the standards, and let anybody who can meet them in. However, I don't think it's fair to withhold any woman who meets said standards from service because of the way the males in her unit might react to her. That's not really her fault and it would be an infringement on her rights to keep her out because her mere presence might theoretically lessen the maximum effectiveness of her unit. I feel the same way about gays in the military.

One might argue that it's an infringement upon women's rights in the first place to set physical performance standards so high that very few women will be able to meet them. I dunno, for some reason I don't have as much of a problem with that. As long as they don't make them sex specific ("penis required") I'm not going to get all pissed off about it.
 
I don't have much to contribute to the specifics of the women-in-the-military discussion, but I did have to wonder about the first clause in the following statement:

Ekserb said:
Let me go out on a limb here and say that men and women are not equal and never will be, but the reason that women should not be allowed to fight alongside men in the military isn't because they can't do as many push-ups or run as fast (which they can't, but we'll get to that in a minute). It's because men are different when there's a woman in the mix.

Why are women and men not equal? Why will they never be? Enlighten me, please. No doubt it's my feeble female intellect, but the first sentence in that paragraph didn't seem to make much sense.
 
monique1971 said:
I don't have much to contribute to the specifics of the women-in-the-military discussion, but I did have to wonder about the first clause in the following statement:



Why are women and men not equal? Why will they never be? Enlighten me, please. No doubt it's my feeble female intellect, but the first sentence in that paragraph didn't seem to make much sense.


I don't think he's trying to imply that men are better than women as far as our basic worth as human beings go, but we are different in terms of our respective physicalities and societal roles. Every culture on earth, be it matriarchal or patriarchal has divided tasks based foremost on sex.
 
monique1971 said:
Why are women and men not equal? Why will they never be? Enlighten me, please. No doubt it's my feeble female intellect, but the first sentence in that paragraph didn't seem to make much sense.

Lorali82 said:
I don't think he's trying to imply that men are better than women as far as our basic worth as human beings go, but we are different in terms of our respective physicalities and societal roles. Every culture on earth, be it matriarchal or patriarchal has divided tasks based foremost on sex.

What she said.
 
Lorali82 said:
I absolutely agree with you that everyone should have to adhere to the same physical requirements regardless of sex. Set the standards, and let anybody who can meet them in. However, I don't think it's fair to withhold any woman who meets said standards from service because of the way the males in her unit might react to her. That's not really her fault and it would be an infringement on her rights to keep her out because her mere presence might theoretically lessen the maximum effectiveness of her unit. I feel the same way about gays in the military.

One might argue that it's an infringement upon women's rights in the first place to set physical performance standards so high that very few women will be able to meet them. I dunno, for some reason I don't have as much of a problem with that. As long as they don't make them sex specific ("penis required") I'm not going to get all pissed off about it.

I'd probably agree with you if it could be proven that the military men could be counted on to not treat the women any differently, but at this point in history, it ain't gonna happen. Oh, sure, Hollywood likes to portray a future in which the men and women of the armed forces are on such equal footing that they actually shower together and fight side-by-side on the front lines, but that's not the case in any Army on the planet and never has been. I doubt we'll see that in our lifetimes.

In my opinion, military effectiveness trumps political correctness, because the effectiveness of the unit is what brings our guys home in one piece instead of pine boxes. Try to tell someone's mother that her boy died because the female soldier he was fighting with couldn't pull him over a wall or drag his wounded body out of harm's way.
 
Ekserb said:
I'd probably agree with you if it could be proven that the military men could be counted on to not treat the women any differently, but at this point in history, it ain't gonna happen. Oh, sure, Hollywood likes to portray a future in which the men and women of the armed forces are on such equal footing that they actually shower together and fight side-by-side on the front lines, but that's not the case in any Army on the planet and never has been. I doubt we'll see that in our lifetimes.

If some hot chick wants to go fight for stability in Iraq I really don't think it's fair to say, "No sweetie, you'd be too much of a distraction to the other soldiers." This isn't about political correctness, this is about a sheer violation of the rights of half of our voting citizens.

I mean, you may as well take this further and argue that women should be prevented from holding governmental positions because they would be too distracting to all the male law-makers around them. I'm sure many-a-congressman is too busy staring at the ass or tits of the congresswoman in front of him to be able to properly weigh the pros and cons of voting for or against some bill. And then our whole country suffers.

What would you think of a separate all-female military? Would you support something like that?
 
Lorali82 said:
What would you think of a separate all-female military? Would you support something like that?
fishspeakers

Dune starting at God Emperor of Dune
army made entirely of females


anyways
I'd personly rather see a bunch of pissed off people bitching about rights violation than seeing more people in boxes
logic beats emotions when comes to killing
 
ShinigamiSama said:
fishspeakers

Dune starting at God Emperor of Dune
army made entirely of females


anyways
I'd personly rather see a bunch of pissed off people bitching about rights violation than seeing more people in boxes
logic beats emotions when comes to killing

Yeah it's a shame we ruined the military when we started letting the chicks in. It's not like they have anything to contribute. :rolleyes:

I'm sure the increase in soldiers coming home in pine boxes has absolutely nothing to do with strategic miscalculations or anything. It's all about the titties on the frontlines.
 
Lorali82 said:
Yeah it's a shame we ruined the military when we started letting the chicks in. It's not like they have anything to contribute. :rolleyes:

I'm sure the increase in soldiers coming home in pine boxes has absolutely nothing to do with strategic miscalculations or anything. It's all about the titties on the frontlines.
my dad is fireman
there 3 girls in the department as well
they all agree they physicaly preform as well as the males, but thats the beauty of it, theres differant posistions that need to be filled.

and I'm not talking about iraq war
war in general
 
Back
Top