Rebel5soul
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2024
- Posts
- 1,904
1 million plus ineligible voters is NOT a nonexistent problem.Sure thing. Repubs are busy “fixing” an essentially nonexistent problem. I wonder why.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1 million plus ineligible voters is NOT a nonexistent problem.Sure thing. Repubs are busy “fixing” an essentially nonexistent problem. I wonder why.
Voting laws aren’t targeted, they’re general in application.
We don’t know what we don’t know. When voting margins are as small as they were in 2020 it doesn’t take large numbers to effect the win/loss equation.Looks like a pretty valid purge of the voter rolls. Don't see a damn thing about political parties on here, though. But if you're trying to make this about non-citizens voting, and you're too lazy to dust off your abacus, the non-citizens with a voting history represented .0018% of those who were removed from the voting roles. So... congratulations?
We don’t know what we don’t know. When voting margins are as small as they were in 2020 it doesn’t take large numbers to effect the win/loss equation.
It's a moot point in Texas, don't you think? If Trump loses Texas, it won't be because of a couple thousand illegal immigrants.We don’t know what we don’t know. When voting margins are as small as they were in 2020 it doesn’t take large numbers to effect the win/loss equation.
They’re cleaning up their act. I would be more confident that the playing field was fair and if Trump loses Texas, so be it!It's a moot point in Texas, don't you think? If Trump loses Texas, it won't be because of a couple thousand illegal immigrants.
Nope, I’m celebrating fairness and accuracy. What are you democrats so afraid of?So you're essentially celebrating the voter purge - regardless of accuracy - because you think it will help Trump win. Not that it actually improves election fidelity. Got it.
is "dumb racist traitor" redundant?
Sounds like it should have been done a long time ago. Who was Ken Paxton protecting?They’re cleaning up their act. I would be more confident that the playing field was fair and if Trump loses Texas, so be it!
Nope, I’m celebrating fairness and accuracy. What are you democrats so afraid of?
Without ad-hom you’re nothing.Not totally redundant, but if you added “criminal, sexist, zealist, and fascist” to your list, you could probably construct a kick-ass Venn diagram.
Without ad-hom you’re nothing.
Quoting for posterity, because if Trump loses Texas, I don't believe for one second that you will accept it as legitimate.They’re cleaning up their act. I would be more confident that the playing field was fair and if Trump loses Texas, so be it!
Not necessarily the one you think it does. Many Asians and Latinos are culturally conservative, for example. Also, California has safeguards that prevent non-citizens (legal or not) from registering to vote through motor voter.Motor voter statistically adds more Asian, black and latino voters in Ca. Does that affect any particular party?
I really don’t care what you believe.Quoting for posterity, because if Trump loses Texas, I don't believe for one second that you will accept it as legitimate.
Not necessarily the one you think it does. Many Asians and Latinos are culturally conservative, for example. Also, California has safeguards that prevent non-citizens (legal or not) from registering to vote through motor voter.
If that were true, you wouldn't have bothered responding to me.I really don’t care what you believe.
Well, ineligible voters won’t be voting since they’re ineligible, so yeah.1 million plus ineligible voters is NOT a nonexistent problem.
So let me get this right, you believe that the use of ad-hom somehow makes you intellectually superior. It’s a novel idea but a stupid one as well. Anyone who would boast about Biden’s foreign policy is without doubt over challenged intellectually. All your pretty little strategically placed emojis do nothing to camouflage your ineptitude.
ineedhelp1 - like every other right wing imbecile on this board - lacks the mental capacity to distill the transparently obvious point and purpose of the overtly intentional use of childish name-calling and ad-hom by an individual faaaaaaar more clever and intelligent than they are.
I’m going to help ineedhelp1 out:
“Without ad-hom Trump is nothing”
Hope that ^ helps.
ineedhelp1
True. Most of them were Republicans.1 million plus ineligible voters is NOT a nonexistent problem.
All your pretty little strategically placed emojis do nothing to camouflage your ineptitude.
I really don’t care what you believe.
Ah! The ole Roarbags paradox.If that were true, you wouldn't have bothered responding to me.
I stand humbled and corrected. I made that off-the-cuff remark believing that Texas was a strongly red state. The media seems to constantly reinforce that incorrect notion. I was shocked to see the actual breakdown of voters in Texas.True. Most of them were Republicans.
I guess if HisArpy can deal with the monotony of carbon water I can survive your childish nonsense.None of your posts camouflage that extremely-racist post of yours I exposed.
Get used to it: it's going to re-appear in all your threads and in tandem with your posts from here on out.
Without ad-hom you’re nothing.
ineedhelp1 - like every other right wing imbecile on this board - lacks the mental capacity to distill the transparently obvious point and purpose of the overtly intentional use of childish name-calling and ad-hom by an individual faaaaaaar more clever and intelligent than they are.
I’m going to help ineedhelp1 out:
“Without ad-hom Trump is nothing”
Hope that ^ helps.
ineedhelp1
So let me get this right, you believe that the use of ad-hom somehow makes you intellectually superior. It’s a novel idea but a stupid one as well. Anyone who would boast about Biden’s foreign policy is without doubt over challenged intellectually. All your pretty little strategically placed emojis do nothing to camouflage your ineptitude.
The same can be said for our current uniter in chief, pitting conservative trump supporters against progressive Democrats to protect democracy. Another dumb idea.
Hope that helps!