The BS continues to unravel

[OralAllOver]

Nixon was an environmentalist.

I'm reluctant to disagree with someone as wise as you

(maybe a lil?)

Nixon was not kind to the environment in Cambodia

 

[ll74]

I'm reluctant to disagree with someone as wise as you

(maybe a lil?)

Nixon was not kind to the environment in Cambodia

How many things did he do stateside?

Hint: a lot

Also, - if you're calling me wise, you need some.help.

 

[OralAllOver]

How many things did he do stateside?

Hint: a lot

yes
It's insightful of u to recall his moderation in domestic policy

BTW, there is nothing conservative about Trump; he is RADICAL
That is not a value judgment, maybe that's good. But it's odd to see lifelong "conservatives" line up to be radical

 

[ll74]

yes
It's insightful of u to recall his moderation in domestic policy

BTW, there is nothing conservative about Trump; he is RADICAL
That is not a value judgment, maybe that's good. But it's odd to see lifelong "conservatives" line up to be radical

Yes, I'm aware that MAGA isn't conservative

 

[icanhelp1]

Yes, I'm aware that MAGA isn't conservative

So, is your definition of MAGA anyone who voted for Trump? Asking for a friend.

 

[Wilson23]

BTW, there is nothing conservative about Trump; he is RADICAL

Well, he's at that part of the horseshoe where "radical" and "reactionary" merge together.

 

[ll74]

So, is your definition of MAGA anyone who voted for Trump? Asking for a friend.

It isn't.

Answering for your friend.

 

[Wilson23]

So, is your definition of MAGA anyone who voted for Trump? Asking for a friend.

Oh, I'm sure there are a lot of Pubs who held their noses every time, but still voted for Trump out of party loyalty.

Same as with W.

 

[Rebel5soul]

https://www.nationalreview.com/news...king&utm_campaign=newstrack&utm_term=42871752

"Nature" joined the ranks of "The National Enquirer" decades ago. I'm surprised they've even bothered issuing a retraction.

 

[Rightguide]

Asshole.

I'm confused by how you think you're smart.

Most likely, everyone around him is way below average, so because he can come up with one-word answers and an occasional sentence, he becomes “smart one by default,” which gives him a false sense of superiority. He simply doesn't know enough to recognize his own ignorance, but by posting simplistic takes online and getting occasional applause from equally uninformed followers, he mistakes agreement for being correct.

 

[ll74]

Most likely, everyone around him is way below average, so because he can come up with one-word answers and an occasional sentence, he becomes “smart one by default,” which gives him a false sense of superiority. He simply doesn't know enough to recognize his own ignorance, but by posting simplistic takes online and getting occasional applause from equally uninformed followers, he mistakes agreement for being correct.

That sounds like a good explanation.

 

[Wilson23]

"Nature" joined the ranks of "The National Enquirer" decades ago. I'm surprised they've even bothered issuing a retraction.

That ain't Nature. It's a journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles. There's nothing more credible this side of Scientific American.

 

[Rightguide]

That sounds like a good explanation.

Just having a little fun at your expense, nothing personal.

 

[Rightguide]

yes
It's insightful of u to recall his moderation in domestic policy

BTW, there is nothing conservative about Trump; he is RADICAL
That is not a value judgment, maybe that's good. But it's odd to see lifelong "conservatives" line up to be radical

Shows us where Trump has stepped beyond the limits of the Constitution.

 

[Wilson23]

Climate-change deniers are no different from Flat Earthers.

 

[ll74]

Just having a little fun at your expense, nothing personal.

"At your expense"

Also

"Nothing personal"

¯⁠\⁠(⁠°⁠_⁠o⁠)⁠/⁠¯

Words are fun

 

[Wilson23]

Shows us where Trump has stepped beyond the limits of the Constitution.

Any Administration does that follows Cheney et al.'s "unitary executive" theory. This one doesn't?

 

[OralAllOver]

1. Refusing to spend $ budgeted by Congress
2.Tariffs are major taxes which is domain of congress ("emergency" a lie)
3. Ordering troops to US cities (claiming a rebellion? Kidding me? Another ridiculous lie)
4. Emoluments clause -- by far most corrupt national figure in US history
5. Firing federal workers whose jobs authorized by congress

Then there is lie about 2020 election and obstruction of transfer of power?

that enuf for now?

 

[Rightguide]

Climate-change deniers are no different from Flat Earthers.

Calling anyone who questions climate dogma a ‘Flat Earther’ is the laziest substitute for evidence your climate-panic crowd has. These are the same people who predicted ice-free poles by 2013, catastrophic sea-level jumps that never materialized, and endless doomsday deadlines that get quietly pushed back every decade. When your movement’s track record reads like a string of failed apocalyptic prophecies, maybe don’t pretend you’re the Vatican of Science. Skepticism isn’t flat-earthery, it’s what you resort to when the self-proclaimed experts keep moving the goalposts to protect their narrative. I've told you this before when you were assuming the mantle of a Soviet propagandist.

 

[Rightguide]

Any Administration does that follows Cheney et al.'s "unitary executive" theory. This one doesn't?

You make no sense.

 

[Wilson23]

Calling anyone who questions climate dogma a ‘Flat Earther’ is the laziest substitute for evidence your climate-panic crowd has. These are the same people who predicted ice-free poles by 2013

"Science was wrong before"?