The Durham Report Is Out...

[jomar]

If I’m not mistaken the IG referred Mr. Comey for federal prosecution. The fact that many weren’t prosecuted doesn’t mean that crimes weren’t committed. To argue the point is a waste of time. Hillary should be occupying a cell with Sussmann.

The bold has been my contention about trump, but Harpy and RG are, “Nuh uh, if he’s not convicted nothing happened.” Of course, that”s trumps take as well, like if he settles out of court he‘s completely innocent Of any wrongdoing whatsoeve.

Hillary ain’t pure white snow either. If there’s anything to grab on to, let the chips fall. Although folk at that altitude have layers of protections.

 

[HisArpy]

The bold has been my contention about trump, but Harpy and RG are, “Nuh uh, if he’s not convicted nothing happened.” Of course, that”s trumps take as well, like if he settles out of court he‘s completely innocent Of any wrongdoing whatsoeve.

Hillary ain’t pure white snow either. If there’s anything to grab on to, let the chips fall. Although folk at that altitude have layers of protections.

The problem is that in your world, an allegation is all that's necessary for you to believe the worst about those you disagree with. Yet in the real world, allegations aren't proof of wrongdoing.

Currently we have allegations that the Biden's are involved in a massive money laundering scheme. Some of the proof to support that has been laid on the table for the public to view. We have actual evidence. We can debate what the evidence means, but we have actual evidence.

Meanwhile, there's little to no evidence to support the corruption allegations against Trump. Hearsay, fake documents, a false smear campaign, lies, perjury, contempt of congress are all in there, but little to no actual evidence to support the allegations.

Yet you believe the lies rather than the facts because in your world it's convenient to do so.

 

[ll74]

The problem is that in your world, an allegation is all that's necessary for you to believe the worst about those you disagree with. Yet in the real world, allegations aren't proof of wrongdoing.

Currently we have allegations that the Biden's are involved in a massive money laundering scheme. Some of the proof to support that has been laid on the table for the public to view. We have actual evidence. We can debate what the evidence means, but we have actual evidence.

Meanwhile, there's little to no evidence to support the corruption allegations against Trump. Hearsay, fake documents, a false smear campaign, lies, perjury, contempt of congress are all in there, but little to no actual evidence to support the allegations.

Yet you believe the lies rather than the facts because in your world it's convenient to do so.

The Trump campaign handed over polling information to a Russian asset.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

The Trump campaign handed over polling information to a Russian asset.

Yup.

We have actual evidence. We can debate what the evidence means, but we have actual evidence.

 

[Rightguide]

Sure.

https://apnews.com/article/durham-justice-trump-russia-8d50b5f7cbff6670afbb2d866f06edb7

From the article (note the last sentence):

WERE THERE PROBLEMS WITH THE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION?​

Yes, and a Justice Department inspector general inquiry already identified many.

The watchdog report found that FBI applications for warrants to eavesdrop on a former Trump campaign aide, Carter Page, contained significant errors and omitted information that would likely have weakened or undermined the premise of the application.

The cumulative effect of those errors, the report said, was to make it “appear that the information supporting probable cause was stronger than was actually the case.”

Still, the inspector general did not find evidence that investigators acted with political bias and said there was a legitimate basis to open a full investigation into potential collusion, though Durham has disagreed.

As I pointed out years ago. The IG didn't have subpoena power for those out of government nor did he have access to evidence across other agencies and from foreign governments. The IG said the investigation did have a predicate, but he was immediately corrected by Durham and Barr who had superior evidence.

 

[Rightguide]

The bold has been my contention about trump, but Harpy and RG are, “Nuh uh, if he’s not convicted nothing happened.” Of course, that”s trumps take as well, like if he settles out of court he‘s completely innocent Of any wrongdoing whatsoeve.

Hillary ain’t pure white snow either. If there’s anything to grab on to, let the chips fall. Although folk at that altitude have layers of protections.

All we've ever asked of you is to show us what Trump actually did, and produce the evidence. You and the left have failed to do so.

 

[jomar]

The problem is that in your world, an allegation is all that's necessary for you to believe the worst about those you disagree with. Yet in the real world, allegations aren't proof of wrongdoing.

More ascription. Surprise surprise.

Currently we have allegations that the Biden's are involved in a massive money laundering scheme. Some of the proof to support that has been laid on the table for the public to view. We have actual evidence. We can debate what the evidence means, but we have actual evidence.

So go get him.

Meanwhile, there's little to no evidence to support the corruption allegations against Trump. Hearsay, fake documents, a false smear campaign, lies, perjury, contempt of congress are all in there, but little to no actual evidence to support the allegations.

For corruption, but he could not exonerate him either. On obstruction, there was plenty of there there.

Yet you believe the lies rather than the facts because in your world it's convenient to do so.

More ascription. Nice

 

[Rightguide]

For corruption, but he could not exonerate him either. On obstruction, there was plenty of there there.

It wasn't Mueller's job to exonerate Trump. His job was to investigate evidence of criminal activity and he found none. There was never an obstruction of justice or he would have charged it. The point is, the whole investigative affair was illegal because it was based on lies to start with. There was no probable cause for the Crossfire Hurricane investigation and therefore the resulting Mueller Investigation that was based on it. As Durham points out, CIA Director Brennan told Obama this was a scheme invented by the Hillary Clinton Campaign but he allowed it to continue for corrupt political reasons in order to interfere with the election of Donald Trump.

 

[Rightguide]

Here are eight surprises revealed by Durham:

FBI Ignored "Clinton Plan" Intelligence

Bureau Brass Killed Clinton Foundation Investigations

Mueller Team Investigators Worried About Political Influence

The FBI Thought a Steele Dossier Source Was a Russian Spy. They Paid Him $220K Anyway.

FBI Killed Its Danchenko Probe Because It ‘Mistakenly’ Thought He Left The Country

Top Crossfire Hurricane Investigator Had Early Doubts About Probe

Major FBI Informant Fed Handlers Lies About Trump Aide

Comey Drove Trump Campaign Surveillance

BONUS: Here Are All the Witnesses Who Refused to Meet with Durham
Go here for details: https://freebeacon.com/elections/cl...-more-eight-surprises-from-the-durham-report/

 

[coati]

^^^ Boring! Nap time.

 

[jomar]

It wasn't Mueller's job to exonerate Trump.

Mueller said couldn't find a smoking gun of collusion, but he couldn't say it didn't happen either. That's why he actually, I think, used the word exonerate.

His job was to investigate evidence of criminal activity and he found none. There was never an obstruction of justice or he would have charged it.

He found plenty of obstruction evidence, but he couldn't charge trump because of the DOJs stance that a sitting president couldn't be charged with a crime. That's why Barr was hired in the first place.

The point is, the whole investigative affair was illegal because it was based on lies to start with. There was no probable cause for the Crossfire Hurricane investigation and therefore the resulting Mueller Investigation that was based on it. As Durham points out, CIA Director Brennan told Obama this was a scheme invented by the Hillary Clinton Campaign but he allowed it to continue for corrupt political reasons in order to interfere with the election of Donald Trump.

What happened to the part where it said the FBI should have started a bit slower, but an investigation was ultimately a valid one.

This from the link I posted upthread: "Still, the inspector general did not find evidence that investigators acted with political bias and said there was a legitimate basis to open a full investigation into potential collusion, though Durham has disagreed."

Durnam disagreeing isn't the word from God on the matter.

 

[Rightguide]

Mueller said couldn't find a smoking gun of collusion, but he couldn't say it didn't happen either. That's why he actually, I think, used the word exonerate.


He found plenty of obstruction evidence, but he couldn't charge trump because of the DOJs stance that a sitting president couldn't be charged with a crime. That's why Barr was hired in the first place.


What happened to the part where it said the FBI should have started a bit slower, but an investigation was ultimately a valid one.

This from the link I posted upthread: "Still, the inspector general did not find evidence that investigators acted with political bias and said there was a legitimate basis to open a full investigation into potential collusion, though Durham has disagreed."

Durnam disagreeing isn't the word from God on the matter.

Note that Durham's report was released by AG Garland without redaction or edits. It says in part:

"Neither U.S. nor the Intelligence Community appears to have possessed any actual evidence of collusion in their holdings at the commencement of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation,"

"FBI records prepared by [Peter] Strzok in February and March 2017 show that at the time of the opening of Crossfire Hurricane, the FBI had no information in its holdings indicating that at any time during the campaign anyone in the Trump had been in contact with any Russian intelligence officials.”

"The objective facts show that the FBI’s handling of important aspects of the Crossfire Hurricane matter were seriously deficient,” "Based on the review of Crossfire Hurricane and related intelligence activities, we conclude that the (Justice) Department and FBI failed to uphold their important mission of strict fidelity to the law in connection with certain events and activities described in this report."

"Our investigation determined that the Crossfire Hurricane investigators did not and could not corroborate any of the substantive allegations contained in the Steele reporting,"

"In late July 2016, U.S. intelligence agencies obtained insight into Russian intelligence analysis alleging that U.S Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton had approved a campaign plan to stir up a scandal against U.S. Presidential candidate Donald Trump by tying him to Putin and the Russians' hacking of the Democratic National Committee,"

"According to his handwritten notes, CIA Director Brennan subsequently briefed President Obama and other senior national security officials on the intelligence, including the 'alleged approval by Hillary Clinton on July 26, 2016 of a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisors to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by Russian security services."

So, Obama was aware of the Clinton plan to frame Trump and did nothing to stop it. As I said years ago.

 

[Rightguide]

Mueller said couldn't find a smoking gun of collusion, but he couldn't say it didn't happen either. That's why he actually, I think, used the word exonerate.

Because as Durham states it didn't exist. It was all a made-up lie by the Clinton Campaign with the help of the Obama Administration holdovers.

He found plenty of obstruction evidence, but he couldn't charge trump because of the DOJs stance that a sitting president couldn't be charged with a crime. That's why Barr was hired in the first place.

He did not, or he would have reported it. There was no obstruction of Justice

 

[Lazaran]

Mueller said couldn't find a smoking gun of collusion, but he couldn't say it didn't happen either. That's why he actually, I think, used the word exonerate.


He found plenty of obstruction evidence, but he couldn't charge trump because of the DOJs stance that a sitting president couldn't be charged with a crime. That's why Barr was hired in the first place.


What happened to the part where it said the FBI should have started a bit slower, but an investigation was ultimately a valid one.

This from the link I posted upthread: "Still, the inspector general did not find evidence that investigators acted with political bias and said there was a legitimate basis to open a full investigation into potential collusion, though Durham has disagreed."

Durnam disagreeing isn't the word from God on the matter.

Yeah, it was the rapey corrupt orange traitor who claimed “complete and total exoneration” from Robert Mueller’s report.

Robert Mueller testified in front of congress and basically said “Um, no”.

And the IG’s conclusions on the overall justification for the orange POS - Russia investigation are far more evidence based than John Durham’s feelings. The RWCJ “members” who keep focusing on only a small part of the justification for the investigation are being willfully myopic.

SAD!!!

RWCJ “members”

 

[Rightguide]

This from the link I posted upthread: "Still, the inspector general did not find evidence that investigators acted with political bias and said there was a legitimate basis to open a full investigation into potential collusion, though Durham has disagreed."

As set forth in greater detail in Section IV.A.3 .b, before the initial receipt by FBI
Headquarters of information from Australia on July 28, 2016 concerning comments reportedly
made in a tavern on May 6, 2016 by George Papadopoulos, an unpaid foreign policy advisor to
the Trump campaign, the government possessed no verified intelligence reflecting that Trump or
the Trump campaign was involved in a conspiracy or collaborative relationship with officials of
the Russian government. 21 Indeed, based on the evidence gathered in the multiple exhaustive
and costly federal investigations of these matters, including the instant investigation, neither U.S.
law enforcement nor the Intelligence Community appears to have possessed any actual evidence
of collusion in their holdings at the commencement of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation.

 

[Rightguide]

The lesson learned:

"Our investigation also revealed that senior FBI personnel displayed a serious lack of
analytical rigor towards the information that they received, especially information received from
politically affiliated persons and entities. This information in part triggered and sustained
Crossfire Hurricane and contributed to the subsequent need for Special Counsel Mueller's
investigation. In particular, there was significant reliance on investigative leads provided or
funded (directly or indirectly) by Trump's political opponents. The Department did not
adequately examine or question these materials and the motivations of those providing them,
even when at about the same time the Director ofthe FBI and others learned of significant and
potentially contrary intelligence. 45"

"In light of the foregoing, there is a continuing need for the FBI and the Department to
recognize that lack of analytical rigor, apparent confirmation bias, and an over-willingness to
rely on information from individuals connected to political opponents caused investigators to fail
to adequately consider alternative hypotheses and to act without appropriate objectivity or
restraint in pursuing allegations of collusion or conspiracy between a U.S. political campaign and
a foreign power. Although recognizing that in hindsight much is clearer, much of this also seems
to have been clear at the time. We therefore believe it is important to examine past conduct to
identify shortcomings and improve how the government carries out its most sensitive functions.
Section V discusses some of these issues more fully."

"This report does not recommend any wholesale changes in the guidelines and policies
that the Department and the FBI now have in place to ensure proper conduct and accountability
in how counterintelligence activities are carried out. Rather, it is intended to accurately describe
the matters that fell under our review and to assist the Attorney General in determining how the
Department and the FBI can do a better, more credible job in fulfilling its responsibilities, and in
analyzing and responding to politically charged allegations in the future. Ultimately, of course,
meeting those responsibilities comes down to the integrity of the people who take an oath to
follow the guidelines and policies currently in place, guidelines that date from the time of
Attorney General Levi and that are designed to ensure the rule of law is upheld. As such, the
answer is not the creation of new rules but a renewed fidelity to the old. The promulgation of
additional rules and regulations to be learned in yet more training sessions would likely prove to
be a fruitless exercise if the FBI's guiding principles of "Fidelity, Bravery and Integrity" are not
engrained in the hearts and minds of those sworn to meet the FBI' s mission of "Protect[ing] the
American People and Uphold[ing] the Constitution of the United States."

So, there you have it. The whole new imperative for cleaning house and starting over at the FBI with a re-emphasis on the code of Fidelity, Bravery and Integrity. Because as Durham suggests, without those guiding principles we will always be at the mercy of a corrupt FBI within the administrative state. Self-governance and the freedom to self-govern requires a moral law-abiding people. Without those standards, the ideal of self-governance devolves into tyranny.

 

[ll74]

The lesson learned:

"Our investigation also revealed that senior FBI personnel displayed a serious lack of
analytical rigor towards the information that they received, especially information received from
politically affiliated persons and entities. This information in part triggered and sustained
Crossfire Hurricane and contributed to the subsequent need for Special Counsel Mueller's
investigation. In particular, there was significant reliance on investigative leads provided or
funded (directly or indirectly) by Trump's political opponents. The Department did not
adequately examine or question these materials and the motivations of those providing them,
even when at about the same time the Director ofthe FBI and others learned of significant and
potentially contrary intelligence. 45"

"In light of the foregoing, there is a continuing need for the FBI and the Department to
recognize that lack of analytical rigor, apparent confirmation bias, and an over-willingness to
rely on information from individuals connected to political opponents caused investigators to fail
to adequately consider alternative hypotheses and to act without appropriate objectivity or
restraint in pursuing allegations of collusion or conspiracy between a U.S. political campaign and
a foreign power. Although recognizing that in hindsight much is clearer, much of this also seems
to have been clear at the time. We therefore believe it is important to examine past conduct to
identify shortcomings and improve how the government carries out its most sensitive functions.
Section V discusses some of these issues more fully."

"This report does not recommend any wholesale changes in the guidelines and policies
that the Department and the FBI now have in place to ensure proper conduct and accountability
in how counterintelligence activities are carried out. Rather, it is intended to accurately describe
the matters that fell under our review and to assist the Attorney General in determining how the
Department and the FBI can do a better, more credible job in fulfilling its responsibilities, and in
analyzing and responding to politically charged allegations in the future. Ultimately, of course,
meeting those responsibilities comes down to the integrity of the people who take an oath to
follow the guidelines and policies currently in place, guidelines that date from the time of
Attorney General Levi and that are designed to ensure the rule of law is upheld. As such, the
answer is not the creation of new rules but a renewed fidelity to the old. The promulgation of
additional rules and regulations to be learned in yet more training sessions would likely prove to
be a fruitless exercise if the FBI's guiding principles of "Fidelity, Bravery and Integrity" are not
engrained in the hearts and minds of those sworn to meet the FBI' s mission of "Protect[ing] the
American People and Uphold[ing] the Constitution of the United States."

So, there you have it. The whole new imperative for cleaning house and starting over at the FBI with a re-emphasis on the code of Fidelity, Bravery and Integrity. Because as Durham suggests, without those guiding principles we will always be at the mercy of a corrupt FBI within the administrative state. Self-governance and the freedom to self-govern requires a moral law-abiding people. Without those standards, the ideal of self-governance devolves into tyranny.

So no suggested actions outside of reviewing the manual.

 

[Rightguide]

So no suggested actions outside of reviewing the manual.

The only suggestion dummy was the last part of the paragraph I bolded, a return to their motto. Because newer safeguards were put in place after investigations of the FBI perfidy.

 

[Rightguide]

Where's OGG?

Durham Report: British Intelligence Repeatedly Rejected Trump-Russia Investigation ‘Evidence’​

The Durham report reveals British intelligence bluntly regarded the FBI investigation into Trump as corrupt and incompetent — so much so they refused to cooperate with the Mueller investigation.
BY: MARK HEMINGWAY
MAY 17, 2023

On nearly every page of the Durham report, there are shocking details about the absurd lengths the FBI was willing to go to in order to keep pursuing the Trump-Russia investigation. They doggedly continued their investigation despite the fact it was predicated on fabricated evidence and completely unreliable sources, and each new investigative avenue they explored was a dead-end.

According to the Durham report, the faulty nature of the investigation was abundantly obvious to British intelligence who were incredibly blunt in their assessment of the supposed evidence they were shown of alleged “collusion.” It was obvious starting with George Papadopoulos, a former foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign, whose loose talk to Australian diplomats was the justification for opening the Crossfire Hurricane investigation into Trump. On page 60 of the report, the FBI’s Assistant Legal Attache in London (ALAT-1 below) recounted that British intel was incredulous that Papadopoulos’ remarks were enough to launch the investigation:

ALAT-1 told the Office that British Intelligence Service-I did not assess the information about the Russians and Trump, attributed to Papadopoulos, to be particularly valuable intelligence. Indeed, he told the FBI’s Inspection Division investigators that “the British could not believe the Papadopoulos bar conversation was all there was,” and they were convinced the FBI must have had more information that it was holding back.

That’s not all. The FBI’s U.K. legal attache reports British intel was quite blunt about the fact that they thought the FBI’s plan “made no sense”:

UK ALA T-1 went on to tell the Inspection Division that in discussing the matter with a senior British Intelligence Service-I official, the official was openly skeptical, said the FBI’s plan for an operation made no sense, and asked UK ALAT-1 why the FBI did not just go to Papadopoulos and ask him what they wanted to know, a sentiment UK ALAT-1 told investigators that he shared.

More here: https://thefederalist.com/2023/05/1...rejected-trump-russia-investigation-evidence/

 

[ll74]

The only suggestion dummy was the last part of the paragraph I bolded, a return to their motto. Because newer safeguards were put in place after investigations of the FBI perfidy.

Yes, reread the manual. That's what I said.

You'd think if it was as serious as you seem to be suggesting, that he might have provided a more extensive laundry list of changes.

I'm sure it's not because you're making more out of it than what is there.

 

[jomar]

Note that Durham's report was released by AG Garland without redaction or edits. It says in part:

…

"According to his handwritten notes, CIA Director Brennan subsequently briefed President Obama and other senior national security officials on the intelligence, including the 'alleged approval by Hillary Clinton on July 26, 2016 of a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisors to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by Russian security services."

So, Obama was aware of the Clinton plan to frame Trump and did nothing to stop it. As I said years ago.

I find it exceedingly hard to believe Brennans handwritten notes would say that so I call bullshit on the obvious spin.

 

[jomar]

Because as Durham states it didn't exist.

On collusion: Durham states it didn’t exist. Mueller said he couldn’t prove collusion existed but he couldn’t prove it didn’t, either.

He did not, or he would have reported it. There was no obstruction of Justice

On obstruction: He did report it. Multiple times of it. He didn’t make the charge because of DOJ restrications.

 

[jomar]

As set forth in greater detail in Section IV.A.3 .b, before the initial receipt by FBI
Headquarters of information from Australia on July 28, 2016 concerning comments reportedly
made in a tavern on May 6, 2016 by George Papadopoulos, an unpaid foreign policy advisor to
the Trump campaign, the government possessed no verified intelligence reflecting that Trump or
the Trump campaign was involved in a conspiracy or collaborative relationship with officials of
the Russian government. 21 Indeed, based on the evidence gathered in the multiple exhaustive
and costly federal investigations of these matters, including the instant investigation, neither U.S.
law enforcement nor the Intelligence Community appears to have possessed any actual evidence
of collusion in their holdings at the commencement of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation.

The lesson learned:

"Our investigation also revealed that senior FBI personnel displayed a serious lack of
analytical rigor towards the information that they received, especially information received from
politically affiliated persons and entities. This information in part triggered and sustained
Crossfire Hurricane and contributed to the subsequent need for Special Counsel Mueller's
investigation. In particular, there was significant reliance on investigative leads provided or
funded (directly or indirectly) by Trump's political opponents. The Department did not
adequately examine or question these materials and the motivations of those providing them,
even when at about the same time the Director ofthe FBI and others learned of significant and
potentially contrary intelligence. 45"

"In light of the foregoing, there is a continuing need for the FBI and the Department to
recognize that lack of analytical rigor, apparent confirmation bias, and an over-willingness to
rely on information from individuals connected to political opponents caused investigators to fail
to adequately consider alternative hypotheses and to act without appropriate objectivity or
restraint in pursuing allegations of collusion or conspiracy between a U.S. political campaign and
a foreign power. Although recognizing that in hindsight much is clearer, much of this also seems
to have been clear at the time. We therefore believe it is important to examine past conduct to
identify shortcomings and improve how the government carries out its most sensitive functions.
Section V discusses some of these issues more fully."

"This report does not recommend any wholesale changes in the guidelines and policies
that the Department and the FBI now have in place to ensure proper conduct and accountability
in how counterintelligence activities are carried out. Rather, it is intended to accurately describe
the matters that fell under our review and to assist the Attorney General in determining how the
Department and the FBI can do a better, more credible job in fulfilling its responsibilities, and in
analyzing and responding to politically charged allegations in the future. Ultimately, of course,
meeting those responsibilities comes down to the integrity of the people who take an oath to
follow the guidelines and policies currently in place, guidelines that date from the time of
Attorney General Levi and that are designed to ensure the rule of law is upheld. As such, the
answer is not the creation of new rules but a renewed fidelity to the old. The promulgation of
additional rules and regulations to be learned in yet more training sessions would likely prove to
be a fruitless exercise if the FBI's guiding principles of "Fidelity, Bravery and Integrity" are not
engrained in the hearts and minds of those sworn to meet the FBI' s mission of "Protect[ing] the
American People and Uphold[ing] the Constitution of the United States."

So, there you have it. The whole new imperative for cleaning house and starting over at the FBI with a re-emphasis on the code of Fidelity, Bravery and Integrity. Because as Durham suggests, without those guiding principles we will always be at the mercy of a corrupt FBI within the administrative state. Self-governance and the freedom to self-govern requires a moral law-abiding people. Without those standards, the ideal of self-governance devolves into tyranny.

Where's OGG?

Durham Report: British Intelligence Repeatedly Rejected Trump-Russia Investigation ‘Evidence’​

The Durham report reveals British intelligence bluntly regarded the FBI investigation into Trump as corrupt and incompetent — so much so they refused to cooperate with the Mueller investigation.
BY: MARK HEMINGWAY
MAY 17, 2023

On nearly every page of the Durham report, there are shocking details about the absurd lengths the FBI was willing to go to in order to keep pursuing the Trump-Russia investigation. They doggedly continued their investigation despite the fact it was predicated on fabricated evidence and completely unreliable sources, and each new investigative avenue they explored was a dead-end.

According to the Durham report, the faulty nature of the investigation was abundantly obvious to British intelligence who were incredibly blunt in their assessment of the supposed evidence they were shown of alleged “collusion.” It was obvious starting with George Papadopoulos, a former foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign, whose loose talk to Australian diplomats was the justification for opening the Crossfire Hurricane investigation into Trump. On page 60 of the report, the FBI’s Assistant Legal Attache in London (ALAT-1 below) recounted that British intel was incredulous that Papadopoulos’ remarks were enough to launch the investigation:


That’s not all. The FBI’s U.K. legal attache reports British intel was quite blunt about the fact that they thought the FBI’s plan “made no sense”:


More here: https://thefederalist.com/2023/05/1...rejected-trump-russia-investigation-evidence/

Dang man, with the release of the Durham report you won’t need to fill that viagra prescription for a hot minute.

 

[VinnyVeritas]

The protestations here display a bias so overpowering that no new evidence can be considered so only the old serious charges remain in the those minds locked firmly into the past. These minds will deny that a Deep State exists, they will ridicule the notion, but at the same time support and laud all of its Machiavellian machinations.

 

[Chobham]

The protestations here display a bias so overpowering that no new evidence can be considered so only the old serious charges remain in the those minds locked firmly into the past. These minds will deny that a Depp State exists, they will ridicule the notion, but at the same time support and laud all of its Machiavellian machinations.

They'll continue to support the false narrative that was floated until such time as the state turns on them. They don't seem to grasp how dangerous this is for EVERY ONE!!!