The Good shooting is a Minnesota STATE case
- Thread starter Wilson23
- Start date
nowisthetime
The Time Is Now!
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2014
- Posts
- 11,905
Oh
Ignore what the maggots say. They suffer from orange boot-licking psychosis. They have proven to be very ignorant. Their whole existence is simply to "own libz" , that's why they are flailing in here with arguments no matter how faulty. They don't see her as a human being, they want people standing down and being afraid to assert their rights as their leader wants.
You are right, even if a fed officer is involved, a homicide in Minnesota should be treated as a Minnesota matter. The state AG and the county are launching their own investigation and want state investigators to have access to videos and other evidence after she was shot by ICE. Justice is slow as molasses but it takes time and should not be rushed. Her children lost their mother and she deserves justice no matter what these soulless maggots say.
The FBI taking over and blocking the state from key materials absolutely undermines transparency. State and local leaders are arguing the federal agent isn’t above the law and the state should have a real role here as they should. We will see how this plays out, personally, he should have been dealt with right there on the spot, but I don't make the laws. I’ve also read that the agent claims he suffers from PTSD after being dragged during a prior incident months earlier, but PTSD is not a free pass for killing someone. If anything, it raises serious questions about fitness for duty and accountability, not automatic clearance.
I want to be clear about something else. She was not a terrorist, as the Used Blow up doll looking botox lips puppy eliminator and them claim. The real domestic terrorism is policies that deliberately harm vulnerable people, like trying to freeze SNAP benefits for poor families as the orange blob is aiming to do in Minnesota out of infantile pettiness.
Ignore what the maggots say. They suffer from orange boot-licking psychosis. They have proven to be very ignorant. Their whole existence is simply to "own libz" , that's why they are flailing in here with arguments no matter how faulty. They don't see her as a human being, they want people standing down and being afraid to assert their rights as their leader wants.
You are right, even if a fed officer is involved, a homicide in Minnesota should be treated as a Minnesota matter. The state AG and the county are launching their own investigation and want state investigators to have access to videos and other evidence after she was shot by ICE. Justice is slow as molasses but it takes time and should not be rushed. Her children lost their mother and she deserves justice no matter what these soulless maggots say.
The FBI taking over and blocking the state from key materials absolutely undermines transparency. State and local leaders are arguing the federal agent isn’t above the law and the state should have a real role here as they should. We will see how this plays out, personally, he should have been dealt with right there on the spot, but I don't make the laws. I’ve also read that the agent claims he suffers from PTSD after being dragged during a prior incident months earlier, but PTSD is not a free pass for killing someone. If anything, it raises serious questions about fitness for duty and accountability, not automatic clearance.
I want to be clear about something else. She was not a terrorist, as the Used Blow up doll looking botox lips puppy eliminator and them claim. The real domestic terrorism is policies that deliberately harm vulnerable people, like trying to freeze SNAP benefits for poor families as the orange blob is aiming to do in Minnesota out of infantile pettiness.
No, that's just being mean. Terrorism has to involve intent to scare somebody.
That case has nothing to do with state vs. federal jurisdiction.
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 70,709
They have no jurisdiction over a federal officer enforcing federal law. See my earlier post on the subject.
They do, same as if the officer were actually ordered to kill.
https://www.rawstory.com/trump-2674872398/
MN prosecutor promises to investigate ICE agent who shot woman to death: 'It's not over'
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison said over the weekend that he wants to hold people accountable for the recent ICE actions whether it is before or after Trump leaves office.
MN prosecutor promises to investigate ICE agent who shot woman to death: 'It's not over'
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison said over the weekend that he wants to hold people accountable for the recent ICE actions whether it is before or after Trump leaves office.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...on-minneapolis-ice-shooting-renee-nicole-good
Leaders alarmed about fairness of FBI inquiry into Minneapolis ICE shooting
State and local leaders say they do not believe that the FBI investigation of the shooting death of Renee Nicole Good will be fair and impartial, and are sounding alarms about the impact of federal officials holding onto evidence in a potential prosecution of the ICE agent who killed her.
Minnesota’s lead investigative agency, the bureau of criminal apprehension, initially began investigating the shooting in conjunction with the FBI. But the BCA issued a statement Thursday morning saying that “the US attorney’s office had reversed course: the investigation would now be led solely by the FBI, and the BCA would no longer have access to the case materials, scene evidence or investigative interviews necessary to complete a thorough and independent investigation”.
Hennepin county attorney Mary Moriarty, an elected Democrat and the county’s prosecutor, clarified at a press conference Friday that the BCA – which was established in the wake of the George Floyd case – has a very high investigative standard and that this standard can’t be met when the organization doesn’t have access to all the evidence. It does not preclude an investigation, she said. But a lack of access to evidence hampers the investigation.
“When the BCA came to the scene, the evidence had been taken by the FBI,” she said. “They collected the car and took it wherever the BCA does not have access to the car. And the problem isn’t that the FBI took the car, it’s that the BCA doesn’t have access to the car, or right now, even access to the forensic evaluation that happens as a result of the investigation with that car.”
In a press conference on Friday, the Minneapolis mayor, Jacob Frey, described the federal government’s narrative casting Good as the villain as “garbage” and called on the state to conduct its own investigation. “This is a time to follow the law,” he said. “This is not a time to hide from the facts. This is a time to embrace them, making sure that we’re pushing for transparency every step of the way.”
Leaders alarmed about fairness of FBI inquiry into Minneapolis ICE shooting
State and local leaders say they do not believe that the FBI investigation of the shooting death of Renee Nicole Good will be fair and impartial, and are sounding alarms about the impact of federal officials holding onto evidence in a potential prosecution of the ICE agent who killed her.
Minnesota’s lead investigative agency, the bureau of criminal apprehension, initially began investigating the shooting in conjunction with the FBI. But the BCA issued a statement Thursday morning saying that “the US attorney’s office had reversed course: the investigation would now be led solely by the FBI, and the BCA would no longer have access to the case materials, scene evidence or investigative interviews necessary to complete a thorough and independent investigation”.
Hennepin county attorney Mary Moriarty, an elected Democrat and the county’s prosecutor, clarified at a press conference Friday that the BCA – which was established in the wake of the George Floyd case – has a very high investigative standard and that this standard can’t be met when the organization doesn’t have access to all the evidence. It does not preclude an investigation, she said. But a lack of access to evidence hampers the investigation.
“When the BCA came to the scene, the evidence had been taken by the FBI,” she said. “They collected the car and took it wherever the BCA does not have access to the car. And the problem isn’t that the FBI took the car, it’s that the BCA doesn’t have access to the car, or right now, even access to the forensic evaluation that happens as a result of the investigation with that car.”
In a press conference on Friday, the Minneapolis mayor, Jacob Frey, described the federal government’s narrative casting Good as the villain as “garbage” and called on the state to conduct its own investigation. “This is a time to follow the law,” he said. “This is not a time to hide from the facts. This is a time to embrace them, making sure that we’re pushing for transparency every step of the way.”
Rebel5soul
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2024
- Posts
- 7,419
The ignorant bastard doesn't understand the law, or just enjoys lying through his teeth.
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 45,531
Lol. You really are kidding yourself if you think anyone other than dumbass libs believes the shit you're spewing.
Marbury is THE seminal case in which the concept of federalism, as outlined in the Constitution, was acknowledged supreme over State laws and Rights. Under Marbury, States cannot do ANYTHING which curtails the Federal Government's authority. Thus, it controls jurisdiction completely.
Here, in the Mn shooting case, FEDERAL LAW controls, not State law, because a Federal Officer was performing his duties as a Federal Officer at the time of the shooting.
You, desperately needing to advance your ideology, have created a false narrative as fake as the NinnyGirl's lie that ICE doesn't have powers of arrest when it comes to US citizens.
No STATE was party to the case. It was a matter entirely within the federal government, and the decision adjudicated nothing relevant to the limits of federal vs. state power.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marbury_v._Madison
When this goes to court, and it will, the Minnesota authorities will win.
NeonSubtlety
I'm a guy. I promise.
- Joined
- May 16, 2010
- Posts
- 13,533
Case law would seem to indicate that his is a federal matter. A lot of that is old or obscure (not that it’s not still good law). But, most recently, decisions were made by the Supreme Court about the standoff at Ruby Ridge which held that federal agents who are accused of state crimes are removed to federal court because their authority to do so (under federal law) would be examined in comparison to state criminal law.
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 45,531
Lol.
Marbury established the power of Judicial Review. This gave the court authority to decide state level cases and make those decisions stick. Notably, at the time Marbury was decided, the justices were still riding their circuits hearing cases out in the States. Marbury ensured that the decisions made by the justices were the law and that the States couldn't ignore or countermand the decisions. This is the earliest form of the concept of Federalism wherein the court decided that neither Congress, nor the States, could enact laws which contravened the Constitution.
The scope of this authority was further buttressed in McCulloch v. Maryland whereby the SCOTUS decided that States couldn't tax the Federal Government because the power to tax is the power to destroy. It was able to reach this conclusion because Marbury ensured that the SCOTUS had the power to review and decide cases involving the Constitution as well as State laws. It is under this umbrella that the ability to petition the SCOTUS to hear a case involving a State law and a citizen can be made and the matter heard. Why? Because the courts have the power to review cases/controversies as related to the Constitution and Federal law. This is why the petition for Certiorari requires raising a Federal Question and Federal Questions don't stop merely because the issue happened inside a State's borders.
Here, the law is clear. If a Federal agent/employee is engaged in the performance of his duties, he cannot be held liable by States for the performance of those duties. This is the law because of Marbury and the cases such as McCulloch which followed it.
What's funny is that this is foundational bedrock Con Law and you don't know it.
No, that does not follow from those cases.
If a federal agent had killed a civilian during the Biden Admin, under any circumstances, how many of you would be pleading federal supremacy here?
I would not be. Let state investigation and prosecution happen though it embarrasses Biden.
I would not be. Let state investigation and prosecution happen though it embarrasses Biden.
You're just making shit up.
He's a fed, it's a clean shoot, you and the other insurectionist can suck it.
We've been through this and we didn't do what you said we would.
You did what you said we would....you're projecting, as usual.
The courts will not decide that way.
No charges, no court.
You still don't understand that you guys lost the election......figure it out.
The Admin cannot prevent charges.
John_von_Neumann
Virgin
- Joined
- May 18, 2022
- Posts
- 2,751
That's not how this works, Shit4brains. And that's not how the Supremacy Clause is relevant. God damn. Can't you get anything right?
Marbury v. Madison is irrelevant in this case. How the hell did you pass the bar exam??
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 45,531
It really isn't my fault you slept through law school.
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 45,531
They already have, multiple times, in the past. You needing to salve your ego doesn't change that at all.
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 45,531
It's not my fault you slept harder than Rip Van Winkle rather than go to law school.
Similar threads
