Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
starrkers said:Yeah, mine went from awful to mediocre, so I'm out of the running too.
Score 4.65, votes 37, views 4988, comments 16.
MistressLynn said:Mine is right about there too with a 4.66 I believe.
Still better than I thought it would do though.

l8bloom said:Congratulations, winners!![]()
Well done!
Guess I should weigh in ...
4.64, 36 votes, 6476 views. Not bad. Still, I had ought to strive to improve, lest my H's wink on & off like xmas trees, thus drawing the criticism of a certain reviewer over the word 'brilliant.'![]()
& you thought I was asleep![]()
scouries said:God it tries so hard! Okay if he wants to try a little cutesy humor, an in joke for his buddies, so what? But on every second line? Miss sarahhhh got banned for being funny, for writing a story that the censors felt was too humorous to be in this category. The author of this story started out to write a Humor Category story but even the censor didn’t find it funny. “Christ, put it in the bloody ‘How To’ contest,” Laurel finally ordered one of her minions.
The continuous asides to other ‘in groupers’, to his AH buddies, is almost pathetic, and the story may include some of the most ‘sucky up’ lines in Literotica contest history. A Julie Andrews moment? Little Miss DK is studying hard for her presentation? Sweetwitch and her newts? Yuck
You have to wonder what the ‘Average Joe’ reader opening this story randomly, thinking a contest story probably should be pretty good, would make of the whole thing. My guess is he’d be clicked out and long gone by the end of the second paragraph.
Which is of course the author’s greatest failing here. He doesn’t care about them. In fact he doesn’t want them to get to the end and vote. You can feel the utter disdain he shows for not only Literotica’s readers but also other authors he clearly feels superior to. He may speak for his “fellow [AH] Romance writers” but certainly not for the vast majority of us.
Surely sir, if you are going to write a story to be entered in a major Literotica competition its sole purpose shouldn’t be to mock the people that you rely on so much for to feed your ego. For yes, even though, like so many of your AH friends, you dismiss the majority of readers as simpletons and perverts, you still crave the rush that comes from having your stories ‘viewed’.
Quite frankly I hope you win the contest. Then this (expletive deleted) story will have to stay on the site forever, a testament to one authors arrogance and pettiness.
MarshAlien said:My apologies, Ogg, if my comment on your story was offensive. I thought it was very well-done and quite worthy of the 5 that I gave it. I was actually just tired of writing the same old comments as everyone else.
I obviously have to work on curbing my arrogance and pettiness when I'm trying to be funny. Otherwise I end up with public feedback like this:
Anybody get any better feedback than that?
MarshAlien said:My apologies, Ogg, if my comment on your story was offensive. I thought it was very well-done and quite worthy of the 5 that I gave it. I was actually just tired of writing the same old comments as everyone else.
I obviously have to work on curbing my arrogance and pettiness when I'm trying to be funny...
oggbashan said:I didn't find it offensive. I thought it was complimentary. But then I have read several of your posts here so I understand your style.
I would take Scouries' feedback with a pinch of salt. Scouries has an acid pen for criticism. Sometimes that is more valid than fulsome praise but one needs a sense of proportion because Scouries has definite views.
Og
MarshAlien said:Oh, I already thanked him very much for his intelligent and understated criticism. This has been nothing but a tremendous learning experience for me. As for your feedback, Selena, wow! I concede the prize.
SelenaKittyn said:Did S. post his feedback on your how-to, Marshy, or just to the boards?
MarshAlien said:Just the boards, in his discussion of the how-to contest. Unlike your correspondent, he wouldn't have wasted his time typing something like that for only a few people to read.
The great thing about "da scourge" is the way he never permits lack of knowledge or experience to restrain his urge to share his opinions.MarshAlien said:Just the boards, in his discussion of the how-to contest. Unlike your correspondent, he wouldn't have wasted his time typing something like that for only a few people to read. Of course, I did post my own criticism of one of his works earlier in the thread. And as the saying goes, you reap what you sow . . .
Rumple Foreskin said:ps: Last Place (tm) wise I'm out of the hunt. MarshAlien and I were in a neck-in-neck race for the big bucks until that last sweep did us both in, or out as the case may be. To be honest, I'm pleased with a 4.71 score and 17 PC's but disappointed that my "Happy Hooker" finished with only 31 votes. rf
Box, the sad fate of your fine entry is a cautionary example for all future contestants.Boxlicker101 said:Personally, I would have felt good with that many votes and PC and that score.![]()
Boxlicker101 said:Quote:
Originally Posted by starrkers
Yeah, mine went from awful to mediocre, so I'm out of the running too.
Score 4.65, votes 37, views 4988, comments 16.
You were both head and shoulders, and I don't mean shampoo, above me.My score was only 4.58, with just 19 votes and 9 PC from 6,161 views.
Those low numbers were quite disappointing because my essay was one of the first six to be posted.
Early on, it was actually below 3.00, which made me think I had a shot at the last place (tm) prize, but I doubt if I have a shot at that either.![]()
starrkers said:You got more views than me and less votes - that's weird.
Using Ogg's formula you come out with a score of 3.48 - that's gotta be a contender!
(I still can't believe it got voted that low - I thought it was great)
It was probably the Pavlovian response to the words "iambic" and "Pentameter" that did you in.Boxlicker101 said:My essay was one of the first ones posted. Just in the course of things, it would have picked up quite a few views.![]()
starrkers said:It was probably the Pavlovian response to the words "iambic" and "Pentameter" that did you in.
Yes, but not on Lit, and yours was the first I fully understood.Boxlicker101 said:Could be. Actually, it was more likely "heptameter". I tried to avoid being too technical, but those words are used, and I felt I had to explain them. Have you ever before read a "How-to" that used words like that?
Boxlicker101 said:... My score was only 4.58, with just 19 votes and 9 PC from 6,161 views.Those low numbers were quite disappointing because my essay was one of the first six to be posted.
Early on, it was actually below 3.00, which made me think I had a shot at the last place (tm) prize, but I doubt if I have a shot at that either.![]()