The "I" Word

[unregistered]

 

[Sean]

Another thread by a board liberal about impeaching Obama!

 

[unregistered]

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Slow news Monday, huh, Vette?

http://i1088.photobucket.com/albums/i328/ckinfl/tobiassobbing.gif

 

[bronzeage]

For the benefit of those, such as yourself, who need guidance on what constitutes "high crimes and misdemeanors," and the fantasy you've been led to believe.

So, why isn't the President being impeached? If there really is a case against him, it would be dereliction of duty to let it continue. What's wrong with the GOP majority house, which lets this continue?

 

[IrezumiKiss]

So, why isn't the President being impeached? If there really is a case against him, it would be dereliction of duty to let it continue. What's wrong with the GOP majority house, which lets this continue?

I can't understand this, either.

Either you got something or you don't got.

This is just getting excited over barking. Why even bother barking if you're not gonna bite?

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

So, why isn't the President being impeached? If there really is a case against him, it would be dereliction of duty to let it continue. What's wrong with the GOP majority house, which lets this continue?

Theyre generous people. Besides, Obama now gets to own ebola.

 

[Disgustipated]

So, why isn't the President being impeached? If there really is a case against him, it would be dereliction of duty to let it continue. What's wrong with the GOP majority house, which lets this continue?

Because they have nothing and they are incompetent.

 

[snugglestruggle]

So, why isn't the President being impeached? If there really is a case against him, it would be dereliction of duty to let it continue. What's wrong with the GOP majority house, which lets this continue?

No courage of their convictions. They should either do it because there's a case or STFU

 

[1sickbastard]

So, why isn't the President being impeached? If there really is a case against him, it would be dereliction of duty to let it continue. What's wrong with the GOP majority house, which lets this continue?

That would involve taking personal responsibility, which the current GOP seems to loathe, at least when it comes to their own personal responsibility.

 

[cjh]

So, why isn't the President being impeached? If there really is a case against him, it would be dereliction of duty to let it continue. What's wrong with the GOP majority house, which lets this continue?

He hasn't been impeached for the Benghazi coverup yet?

 

[unregistered]

 

[1sickbastard]

Why don't you read the article and figure it out?

If you need someone to explain the article to you, you could just ask.

The gist of the article, first printed in the Washington Post, reprinted by the National Review and published on the web by Breibert.com, is that the current POTUS could be impeached for his actions, if the House GOP had the fucking stones to actually bring impeachment charges to a floor vote.

So, to re-cap, George Washington Law School professor Johnathan Turley has presented a defensible case that Obama could be impeached for incompetence, negligence, perfidy, violating the public trust or just for being a lousy politician, and such an impeachment would be completely legitimate.

However, the House GOP has NOT brought impeachment charges, and only just managed to vote for a civil suit.

So why hasn't the House GOP brought impeachment charges against Barry?
If they really believed in impeaching the president, not doing so would be a gross dereliction of their solemn duty to the Republic.

In my mind, and I think the minds of those who actually bother to use them, it shapes up to this:
a)The House GOP are a bunch of chickenshit cowards who don't posses the courage of their convictions, or,
b)The House GOP would rather continue to whine & obstruct instead of taking fucking responsibility for the shit they spew and doing their fucking jobs (meaning they should, by the same rational be thrown out of office), or
c)The House GOP are more concerned about their own political careers than fulfilling their oaths of office and serving the Republic, or
d)The guy who wrote it is full of shit, but it's helps to manufacture yet more bullshit outrage to drive up ratings and ad revenues, or
e)You and others of your ilk are so blinded by your own bullshit that you are incapable to think for yourselves and/or hold your political heroes accountable for their utter lack of vision or for the failure of an increasingly outdated, fossilized ideology.

If there's other options, please list them. But do your own thinking if you can. I don't feel like waiting until Fox or Breibert to do it for you.

 

[bronzeage]

Why don't you read the article and figure it out?

It's really simple. GOP impeachment talk is just a sermon for the choir. They know the nation will not support them and it would be a disaster.

It's a lost cause and any attempt to push it will devastate the party and leave them no hope of holding Congress or winning the Whitehouse.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Que]

It's really simple. GOP impeachment talk is just a sermon for the choir. They know the nation will not support them and it would be a disaster.

It's a lost cause and any attempt to push it will devastate the party and leave them no hope of holding Congress or winning the Whitehouse.

So the impeachment talk by the DNC and the President is a sermon for whom, then?

For the record, even if they had the votes in The Senate as well, I am opposed to it for several reasons. For instance: the only thing that would be worse for distorting the eventual place in history for this disaster of an administration is if he were to actually be martyred. Also, Joe Biden??

 

[bronzeage]

And why is that? Like the vetteman schooled you the other day. Impeachment is a political exercise, not a legal exercise. So for all you you blockheads out there, the politics in the nation has to be right, public opinion has to support impeachment, but it a mistake to think that public opinion towards the President, in the present environment, isn't subject to change in this regard, is naive.

That last sentence is some of the biggest bullshit you've ever come up with. The fact is, if Obama hadn't put off the employer mandate, he's be looking at impeachment right now.

You are too funny. School me some more.

Whether or not "Impeachment is a political exercise" or not, it would be political suicide for the GOP and they know it. That's why all they are going to do is talk, which keeps people like you excited, but accomplishes nothing but continue to show the rest of the country that the Republicans are incapable of anything but talk.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Barking.

Moar barking.

Woof woof.

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxpj6grFIe1qcaomb.gif

 

[unregistered]

 

[Que]

Being a duty bound American, Lord knows the vetteman has tried, but you being from "Loosianna" makes the hope for your higher edification a "loosin'" proposition.

HEY!... I began my educmacation in a Parish just south of Mississippi.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Bark!

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxpj6grFIe1qcaomb.gif

 

[DooleyDarter]

Obama has talked about his impeachment more than anybody else, I am waiting for that dumb mother fucker to start the process on hisself any day now.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Obama has talked about his impeachment more than anybody else, I am waiting for that dumb mother fucker to start the process on hisself any day now.

aaaaaaany day now.

ayup.

 

[DooleyDarter]

aaaaaaany day now.

ayup.

*L* hey ya never know

 

[miles]

Obama has talked about his impeachment more than anybody else, I am waiting for that dumb mother fucker to start the process on hisself any day now.

He's using it to energize the Democrap base and raise money.