The Menendez (demoncrap) indictment: ‘Girlfriend 2,’ the doctor and the senator

sr71plt;66591127[ Are you or anyone else saying that Brown was a Bush crony before he was appointed?[/QUOTE said:
I've already addressed the other parts of your post which you didn't read. So I'm just going to tell you to go back and read the articles I linked to.

Also, I wouldn't bother posting here if you're just going to parrot GOP talking points because as vette and busy body know that's an excellent way to get your asshole ruined.
 
I've already addressed the other parts of your post which you didn't read. So I'm just going to tell you to go back and read the articles I linked to.

Also, I wouldn't bother posting here if you're just going to parrot GOP talking points because as vette and busy body know that's an excellent way to get your asshole ruined.

Other than making the idiotic assertion that if I didn't just parrot what you post I must be Republican, you haven't responded to my questions at all.

Michael Brown was one of hundreds of appointments that George Bush signed in 2003, his name being put forward by the then-chief of FEMA (who, yes, had been Bush's campaign manager in 2000). Brown was then the deputy of FEMA, having moved up from General Counsel. On paper, it was a logical appointment. And if you're suggesting that a president does or should personally vet every government appointment he makes, you don't know much about government.


Are you asserting the existence of a close personal relationship with George Bush as Menendez has with this doctor in Florida rather than just a connection of Brown being one of hundreds of logical appointments that a president makes that are handed over to him by his staff? Or are you suggesting that Brown bankrolled Bush as the Florida doctor has Menendez? Or are you suggesting that Bush did some personal favor for Brown--like arrange visas for a couple of girlfriends previously denied visas--as Menendez allegedly has for the Florida doctor?

Or are you suggesting some other real similarities between the relationship between Brown and Bush and the relationship between the Florida doctor and Menendez? One of Brown buying Bush as the Florida doctor is charged with buying Menendez?

Or are you just blowing doctrinaire smoke and manufacturing some irrelevant jab to irrelevantly post because you are being over-the-edge partisan and can't think up any real connection between these two?

Let me guess which.

Of the two of us who is just making shit up to be dogmatic, I think it's you. And to call you on it doesn't make me a Republican. It makes me tired of this dogmatic, juvenile, partisan made-up shit from both sides of the spectrum.

There's plenty of real stuff to go at the Republicans for without having to make shit like this up just to support a Democrat who may be found needing to be bounced out of office on his head. He doesn't become a "good guy" just because he's a Democrat.

For the record, I'm an Eleanor Roosevelt socialist.
 
Last edited:
Michael Brown was one of hundreds of appointments that George Bush signed in 2003, his name being put forward by the then-chief of FEMA (who, yes, had been Bush's campaign manager in 2000). Brown was then the deputy of FEMA, having moved up from General Counsel. On paper, it was a logical appointment.

Re-read that sentence. Then read this, this, and this.

You see how Brown was completely unqualified for the directorship of FEMA? Again go tell your stupid fucking posts to all those people who lost their homes in Katrina and see how much they give a shit.
 
Nope, doesn't have a damn thing to do with the Menendez case. :rolleyes:

Your posts to this thread are just irrelevant to the thread topic, which is my point.
 
Last edited:
Nope, doesn't have a damn thing to do with the Menendez case. :rolleyes:

Your posts to this thread are just irrelevant to the thread topic, which is my point.

You don't have a point. You are pointless. You are without point.
 
You don't have a point. You are pointless. You are without point.

I guess, since you didn't come back with a reason that the FEMA story has anything to do with the Menendez case, that you finally understood your error and are just too embarrassed to admit it.
 
So if I made one post about when the Easter Bunny met Spiderman, you would write half a dozen posts about how irrelevant it was?
 
So if I made one post about when the Easter Bunny met Spiderman, you would write half a dozen posts about how irrelevant it was?

No, because that wouldn't be you being dishonest by trying to match up a Republican snafu with a Democratic one to irrelevantly make the Democratic one look somehow less a snafu. At least you wouldn't be doing it in that instance--you certainly try to do it in political instances.

As I've noted before, the Republicans have so much available that can be legitimately razzed without making irrelevant shit up about them.

And, in this particular case, just because Menendez is a Democratic politician doesn't mean that what he is accused of doing here is somehow an indictment of Obama or any other Democrat. That's just silliness. And pretty juvenile to boot.
 
Back
Top