EmilyMiller
Story marketing slut
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2022
- Posts
- 15,313
Fingers crossed it recovers.My story now has a score of 4.3 with 10 votes.![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fingers crossed it recovers.My story now has a score of 4.3 with 10 votes.![]()
Well, on the upside, I've never gotten this many votes the first morning before.Fingers crossed it recovers.
Yeah, and the rules specifically mention you can say that.That's crazy, I had a guy mention losing his virginity when he was sixteen without it getting bounced.
The process for assessing whether non-consensual sex (which this clearly is) gets a pass or not is to submit it to @Laurel and not to post text that may well later get rejected on the forums. This is publishing without going through the process. I’d ask you to go through the correct adjudication process. Or at least go ask your question in a separate thread to this one. Thank you.Hey, New here and am finishing up my first submission. It's probably overreaching to go for something like entering a competition, but it's a gothic horror piece and that seems appropriate.
My concern is that the main character gets drugged at a party and, well...
I'm aware the lines can be a little gray in areas like this with NC/R(I read the FAQ first), and I'm looking for a little guidance on whether this scene will pass muster with the mods.
Thanks in advance for any feedback.
Sorry. Deleted. Can I submit partials to this laurel?The process for assessing whether non-consensual sex (which this clearly is) gets a pass or not is to submit it to @Laurel and not to post text that may well later get rejected on the forums. This is publishing without going through the process. I’d ask you to go through the correct adjudication process. Or at least go ask your question in a separate thread to this one. Thank you.
I have done - in other areas - and have got a reply. @Laurel is the co-owner of the site and - as far as anyone knows - the only person who reviews submissions; so her word is final.Sorry. Deleted. Can I submit partials to this laurel?
And the Dark Fairy Tales anthology has been added to the sidebar. Big day for both of us!There is now a front page announcement about the Halloween comp, so maybe we are moving in the direction of normal service being resumed![]()
Yeah - if they’d just add my story to the comp now…And the Dark Fairy Tales anthology has been added to the sidebar. Big day for both of us!
My problem with this is that the competition is already skewed to writers with more followers, and if these authors already have higher scores when the competition truly starts (when the list of all stories is listed on the home page- most readers won't know until then), then readers will decide not to bother voting for the stories with lower scores and less followers. Kind of removes the point of it all IMO and a serious mistake if Laurel wants as level a playing field as she can get. Just saying, and I know I'm not going to win, I'm competing to get a little more exposureYou can see many of them by doing a tag search for “Halloween 2025”
Did it otherwise publish today? If so, that's concerning.Yeah - if they’d just add my story to the comp now…![]()
My story was published - after a resubmission as it was initially caught in the black hole.Did it otherwise publish today? If so, that's concerning.
Otherwise, I counted 20 stories on the Halloween list. Seems low. I'm wondering if they're doing a slow-drip addition of new stories to the list.
Did you get published?You can see many of them by doing a tag search for “Halloween 2025”
My honest advice, based on three years of experience, please stop thinking that:My problem with this is that the competition is already skewed to writers with more followers, and if these authors already have higher scores when the competition truly starts (when the list of all stories is listed on the home page- most readers won't know until then), then readers will decide not to bother voting for the stories with lower scores and less followers. Kind of removes the point of it all IMO and a serious mistake if Laurel wants as level a playing field as she can get. Just saying, and I know I'm not going to win, I'm competing to get a little more exposure
Comps results are in anyway correlated with quality of writing
Those are good figuresI am very happy that my first story has 4.2k views and over 100 votes in about 12 hours.
I expected the Crossdressing category to be fairly slow, but it appears to be pretty active.
It’s an easy hypothesis to prove. While some excellent stories end up placing, it’s not hard to find some winners that have you scratching your head in disbelief.I keep telling myself that...![]()
My problem with this is that the competition is already skewed to writers with more followers, and if these authors already have higher scores when the competition truly starts (when the list of all stories is listed on the home page- most readers won't know until then), then readers will decide not to bother voting for the stories with lower scores and less followers. Kind of removes the point of it all IMO and a serious mistake if Laurel wants as level a playing field as she can get. Just saying, and I know I'm not going to win, I'm competing to get a little more exposure
Did you get published?
SorryMeanwhile, my resubmitted Crime and Punishment story is still in pending limbo.
Have a read of National Nude Daisy, which won the Nude Day Comp this year despite being only the author’s second published story on the site (under that name, anyway). The story is hugely assured, competent and engaging, and was scoring 4.92 at time of the win. Number of followers is not a barrier.My problem with this is that the competition is already skewed to writers with more followers, and if these authors already have higher scores when the competition truly starts (when the list of all stories is listed on the home page- most readers won't know until then), then readers will decide not to bother voting for the stories with lower scores and less followers. Kind of removes the point of it all IMO and a serious mistake if Laurel wants as level a playing field as she can get. Just saying, and I know I'm not going to win, I'm competing to get a little more exposure
And new writers have had less time to accumulate haters. Lack of haters, as opposed to prevalence of lovers, tends to win comps as low votes have such a disproportionate effect. And no, the sweeps are far from comprehensive.The Nude Day competition is the only one I followed closely (the only one I have entered). None of the three prize winners were big name established writers on the site. I had less than 100 followers and had been writing for only a few months. I'm not sure how many followers @Actingup had at the time, but he had fewer than 20 stories total (although some truly excellent ones, unlike me).
My comment to someone earlier today is that there will be a pool of solid stories that will separate out quickly. Almost all of the big name writers will be in that pool -- they all know what they are doing and write consistently good stories. Within that pool, it felt pretty random to me, depending on whose story connected.