The now fully official Author’s Hangout Halloween 2025 competition support thread

oh I'm definitely out. 219 votes but a 4.41 rating. I'm not gonna bounce back from that even with a sweep.

Still im happy with the story and its generally gotten good reviews.
It is a total shame because the Geek Girl is a well written story
Look, we all know some poorly written story about a son tricking his mom and / or sister into fucking by wearing a Halloween costume they dont recognize him in / mistake him for someone else in will win this thing anyway.
I freaking hope not. That would be sad that the lousiest of lousy tropes wins.
I mean, the mom did not recognize the 14 inches cock from her son she had been masturbating to?
 
Look, we all know some poorly written story about a son tricking his mom and / or sister into fucking by wearing a Halloween costume they dont recognize him in / mistake him for someone else in will win this thing anyway.

Uh....Erozetta won last year. The year before that, Altissimus won, Jackie.O.Hikaru was second, and Simon was third.
 
I am ecstatic about the results so far for me.

First participation in a context/competition and first ever SF/F

I have a rating of 4.69 (highest ever for me), 250 votes (highest ever) and 6.3K views. It is a win in my book!

Disclaimer: @EmilyMiller did a beta read so I got some great help. That explain the score A LOT!
She's awesome! She did a read of the beginning of my story and I could tell she knew what she was talking about!
 
Well, I finally picked up my 25 votes. Then I got 1-bombed, as though I'm a serious contender for the prize. ..
 
She (@EmilyMiller) is fantastic.

I feel privileged that she did a beta read of my story
She's awesome! She did a read of the beginning of my story and I could tell she knew what she was talking about!
I am ecstatic about the results so far for me.

First participation in a context/competition and first ever SF/F

I have a rating of 4.69 (highest ever for me), 250 votes (highest ever) and 6.3K views. It is a win in my book!

Disclaimer: @EmilyMiller did a beta read so I got some great help. That explain the score A LOT!
Anyone who used EM editing, beta reading or other suggestions should agree to pay her ten percent of their prize money. The odds of even being in the top three is less than two percent so her money winning odds are in the neighborhood of two dollars. When spread over the number of hours she spent on helping other authors, she’s looking at her winning odds of maybe twenty cents per hour. Sounds like a money-winning venture to me.
(Please, no math nerds need to correct me, I know it is all wild speculation with loose command, if any at all, of statistics.)
 
Uh....Erozetta won last year. The year before that, Altissimus won, Jackie.O.Hikaru was second, and Simon was third.
I know it was probably meant as a joke but given how many authors who frequent AH tend to win or place in contests, still seems in poor taste to me.
 
I freaking hope not. That would be sad that the lousiest of lousy tropes wins.
In all seriousness though, it's an ever-looping and I feel at this point somewhat pointless debate - writers lamenting that readers most reliably react to shallow wank-fuel rather than their well-thought-out masterpieces... and yet for some reason some very complex stories also score high, and of course if *you* or your friends happen to score, then obviously suddenly the readership is very sophisticated.
Not to mention the even nore hilarious phenomenon of readers complaining "this site is all just wish fulfillment junk with no depth" regarding all the tropes they don't personally enjoy, but when they hit the trope they DO personally enjoy, suddenly (figurative) depth is no issue.

The truth is and has always been that some stories vibe with a broad audience and some don't, and frankly I do NOT see a general pattern, so far. Some trends here and there, sure (what IS it with you people and the specific incest tropes?).
I am morbidly curious if it would be possible to write a predictive algorithm for this (you feed your story into it, and it predicts audience engagement).
But either way it stands that some people have an affinity for striking some sort of collective nerve (be it with complex prose or just scribbling down what they thought to themselves while rubbing one out on the toilet one day with no regards for as much as basic grammar), and others can get lucky, and outside that is the vast majority of writers.
 
Addendum:

On another site, someone made an observation about writing success I cannot stop repeating because I find it so interesting:

There is a phenomenon of an author being a one-hit wonder, and sequels being much less well received than first installments, and on forums with multi-chaper content, engagement dropping into the abyss after that first megahit chapter.

And sure some of it can be explained with things like a drop in the writing quality and the novelty wearing off.

But another factor might be that the author hit a homerun with that "collective nerve thing"... Once.
And then they made the mistake to assume that it was something about them or their writing style and worldbuilding ideas in general. But in reality, after that first Hurrah, they go right back into the statistic and are once again no more likely to score than anyone else, once things like loyal fans gained and brand recognition are taken into account.
 
In all seriousness though, it's an ever-looping and I feel at this point somewhat pointless debate - writers lamenting that readers most reliably react to shallow wank-fuel rather than their well-thought-out masterpieces... and yet for some reason some very complex stories also score high, and of course if *you* or your friends happen to score, then obviously suddenly the readership is very sophisticated.
Like I said in another thread:
It's another of those irregular verbs, isn't it? My readers appreciate elegant writing and subtle storytelling, your readers seem to enjoy what you write, his readers don't know better.
 
Back
Top