The only way school shootings/mass shootings are going to stop

[Politruk]

They just won't because the gun grabbers want children to be hurt, to try to remove the firearms.

You really are an idiot.

 

[UltraChad]

There are plenty of free countries that have strict and effectual gun control. The UK is a free country. And the police don't carry guns because the crooks don't either.

The UK is not a free country.

They can't even tell jokes without going to jail.

No private property.

No right to defend themselves.

No right to shit....they are a bunch of enslaved fuckin' cucks who've willingly given up their nation.

 

[Politruk]

The UK is not a free country.

They can't even tell jokes without going to jail.

No private property.

No right to defend themselves.

No right to shit....they are a bunch of enslaved fuckin' cucks who've willingly given up their nation.

Only contemptible cranks in the UK ever complain of lack of freedom there. And not being allowed guns does not mean "no right to defend themselves."

 

[Philthy_Phil]

The only reasonable way to prevent another school shooting is to give every child over 5 and every teacher a handgun.

 

[UltraChad]

Only contemptible cranks in the UK ever complain of lack of freedom there.

So? Doesn't make it not real.

And not being allowed guns does not mean "no right to defend themselves."

It absolutely does, their propensity for prosecuting anyone who hurts one of their OH SO PRECIOUS!!! BELOVED AND WORSHIPED criminal that's violating society, the more vile the more the left loves and worships them.

 

[Politruk]

So? Doesn't make it not real.

Actually, it does.

It absolutely does, their propensity for prosecuting anyone who hurts one of their OH SO PRECIOUS!!! BELOVED AND WORSHIPED criminal that's violating society, the more vile the more the left loves and worships them.

Brits do not need guns to defend themselves because the crooks don't have them either. And there's no reason why that couldn't work here.

 

[UltraChad]

Actually, it does.

No, it doesn't. Stamping your feet saying "NU UHHH!!!" doesn't make the authoritarianism of social democracy go away.

Brits do not need guns to defend themselves

That is one of the more ignorant things you've said.

because the crooks don't have them either.

That doesn't mean you don't need one to defend yourself from them, thus all the victimization you see in those places vs. places where people can arm themselves.

And there's no reason why that couldn't work here.

It doesn't work anywhere, that's why it couldn't work h ere.

 

[Ciceri]

"Our country" in my case is not the USA - hence your embarrassing error. Your failure to read with any care seems an appropriate match for the naivete of your conclusions,

Your error. Your failure. That's no way to have a constructive debate

 

[Politruk]

That doesn't mean you don't need one to defend yourself from them, thus all the victimization you see in those places vs. places where people can arm themselves.

What victimization? Their crime rates are lower than ours.

 

[UltraChad]

What victimization? Their crime rates are lower than ours.

No, they aren't.

Their gun crime is lower but their crime rates aren't.

 

[Politruk]

No, they aren't.

Their gun crime is lower but their crime rates aren't.

The UK's crime rate is lower. And Japan's is much lower.

 

[Politruk]

If CEO shootings become as commonplace as school shootings, there will be gun control and it will be effectively enforced even in the red states.

 

[UltraChad]

The UK's crime rate is lower.

UK's crime rate is almost exactly the same LOL

France and Sweden are more violent... how is that possible with their strict gun control??

Mexico too....way more violent than the USA, major gun control, how do you explain that??

Venezuela, SUPER PROGRESSIVE, big gun control but ultra violent.....amazing how that is.

And Japan's is much lower.

That's because Japan isn't a multicultural progressive shit hole.

 

[Politruk]

That's because Japan isn't a multicultural progressive shit hole.

Japan is a free country with strict gun control.

That is not an oxymoronic description.

 

[UltraChad]

Japan is a free country with strict gun control.

That is not an oxymoronic description.

They are not free and it is an oxymoronic description.

Free people are allowed to arm and defend themselves.

Slaves, not so much.

 

[Politruk]

They are not free and it is an oxymoronic description.

Free people are allowed to arm and defend themselves.

Slaves, not so much.

They use swords -- didn't you ever see Kill Bill?

But swords ain't much use for school massacres.

 

[colddiesel]

The UK is not a free country.

They can't even tell jokes without going to jail.

No private property.

No right to defend themselves.

No right to shit....they are a bunch of enslaved fuckin' cucks who've willingly given up their nation.

I was in the UK only a few weeks back, also the USA. The Brits impress me as the freer society of the two. In particular the Brits are free of the fear of fellow citizens which pervades so much of American society.

 

[UltraChad]

I was in the UK only a few weeks back, also the USA. The Brits impress me as the freer society of the two. In particular the Brits are free of the fear of fellow citizens which pervades so much of American society.

"Freer" in this case meaning more 'progressive' and totalitarian leftist....fuckin' wild.

 

[Politruk]

"Freer" in this case meaning more 'progressive' and totalitarian leftist....fuckin' wild.

Whatever it is, it's better than what we've got.

 

[UltraChad]

Whatever it is, it's better than what we've got.

No it's not.

That's why EVERYONE who says that won't go.....they just won't fucking leave.

USA is SO HORRIBLE even the haters won't get the fuck out. amazing.

 

[Politruk]

No it's not.

That's why EVERYONE who says that won't go.....they just won't fucking leave.

USA is SO HORRIBLE even the haters won't get the fuck out. amazing.

Never, ever fall back on "Love it or leave it!" That was pure idiocy in the Vietnam years and is no less so now.

 

[UltraChad]

Never, ever fall back on "Love it or leave it!" That was pure idiocy in the Vietnam years and is no less so now.

So it's clearly not that bad, and the places you idolize are clearly not that good.

Not even you buy your own bullshit.

Noted.

 

[Politruk]

So it's clearly not that bad, and the places you idolize are clearly not that good.

That is not why "Love it or leave it!" is idiocy. It is idiocy because this is as much my country as yours, and I have as much right to politically participate, and to try to change it. Just as the hippies in the Vietnam era had a right to try to stop the war. In hindsight, even you must agree that the hardhats who told them to shut up, to "Love it or leave it!" were un-American idiots.

 

[UltraChad]

That is not why "Love it or leave it!" is idiocy.

It's not idiocy.

It is idiocy because this is as much my country as yours

Right...but I don't hate it, you do.

I don't think other nations are OH SO BETTER!!!.... you do.

You should leave.

 

[Politruk]

Right...but I don't hate it, you do.

The hippies in the Vietnam era had a right to try to stop the war. In hindsight, even you must agree that the hardhats who told them to shut up, to "Love it or leave it!" were un-American idiots. The hippies were not -- they loved America! Even those who were New Left sortacommies!