There is no 'whistleblower.'

Desiremakesmeweak

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Posts
2,060
The only source the NYT ever had was George Soros' OCCRP (Ukraine) sending 'investigative reports' under some considerable veils regarding 'national security' and/or endangerment to Ukrainian public figures.

It's ALL a pack of lies driven by Bill Browder and George Soros.

Full-fucking-stop.
 
It's official. The deplorables have run out of excuses to defend the criminal con artist so now they deny reality and reach for a bogeyman.
 
The only source the NYT ever had was George Soros' OCCRP (Ukraine) sending 'investigative reports' under some considerable veils regarding 'national security' and/or endangerment to Ukrainian public figures.

It's ALL a pack of lies driven by Bill Browder and George Soros.

Full-fucking-stop.

LMAO. Is your tinfoil hat fitted too tight? 😂🤷
 
The only source the NYT ever had was George Soros' OCCRP (Ukraine) sending 'investigative reports' under some considerable veils regarding 'national security' and/or endangerment to Ukrainian public figures.

It's ALL a pack of lies driven by Bill Browder and George Soros.

Full-fucking-stop.

Q told you that, amirite?
 
Like the bimbo eruptions and the Kavanaugh hearing
now that this has become very popular with the hard Left
you're going to see a third, a fourth, fifth, sixth...,
"whistleblower" and not one of them will care one whit
if they are credible because, as we have learned
without a trial, that volume is a sure sign of guilt...
 
Whistleblower Shmistleblower. The idiot admitted his crime ffs. And said he’d do it again.
 
And, a Washington attorney (Mark Zaid) who was previously representing Obama-era hand-overs, some suggest to extract better pay-out packages, is being used as THE actual source for the secondary supporting 'whistleblowers' in THIS SPECIFIC INSTANCE RE THE UKRAINE. The list of hand-overs are not exactly objective witnesses, and neither are they actual serving officials now.

Whereas in fact, all the recent stories have in fact been emanating from the Ukraine on behalf of people not even remotely connected to the present literal White House geographical location. Which is why NO ONE HAS CLAIMED TO HAVE OVERHEARD ANYTHING DIRECTLY.

The thing is (another) fabrication.
 
And, a Washington attorney (Mark Zaid) who was previously representing Obama-era hand-overs, some suggest to extract better pay-out packages, is being used as THE actual source for the secondary supporting 'whistleblowers' in THIS SPECIFIC INSTANCE RE THE UKRAINE. The list of hand-overs are not exactly objective witnesses, and neither are they actual serving officials now.

Whereas in fact, all the recent stories have in fact been emanating from the Ukraine on behalf of people not even remotely connected to the present literal White House geographical location. Which is why NO ONE HAS CLAIMED TO HAVE OVERHEARD ANYTHING DIRECTLY.

The thing is (another) fabrication.

Once again, your President has admitted to the misconduct he has been accused of. He feels that he has been very open about putting his own reelection over the needs and security of America and sees nothing wrong with this. The whistleblower is merely a corroborating account at this point. Are you calling President Trump a liar? It's okay if you do, many people in America feel that way.
 
And, a Washington attorney (Mark Zaid) who was previously representing Obama-era hand-overs, some suggest to extract better pay-out packages, is being used as THE actual source for the secondary supporting 'whistleblowers' in THIS SPECIFIC INSTANCE RE THE UKRAINE. The list of hand-overs are not exactly objective witnesses, and neither are they actual serving officials now.

Whereas in fact, all the recent stories have in fact been emanating from the Ukraine on behalf of people not even remotely connected to the present literal White House geographical location. Which is why NO ONE HAS CLAIMED TO HAVE OVERHEARD ANYTHING DIRECTLY.

The thing is (another) fabrication.


I can't help but wonder what advantages Trump get with his conversation with Zelensky. I wonder who benefited more from their relationship with Ukraine Trump or the Bidens. It's starting to look like if you're a lefty looney toon and want to avoid a corruption investigation and possible prosecution, just run for office!
 
Back
Top