This Spells it All Out, Even For The Clueless On The Left

Is there any doubt as to the extreme corruption within the democrat party. It’s not even worth arguing the point any longer. PB leftist lack self awareness or any semblance of ethical standards.
*Democratic

Here you are arguing the point that you said doesn't deserve argument.

Donald Jr's wedding was paid for by a Russian oligarch.
Your ambassador from greece demanded $50k from a donor to pay off her Amex bill.
How many no bod contracts have gone to trump family friends businesses?

Deciding not to argue that makes sense 👍
 
POD FORCE ONE might want to reconsider their font because it reads as POO FORCE ONE which, unsurprisingly, is actually a more apt title.
 
*Democratic

Here you are arguing the point that you said doesn't deserve argument.

Donald Jr's wedding was paid for by a Russian oligarch.
Your ambassador from greece demanded $50k from a donor to pay off her Amex bill.
How many no bod contracts have gone to trump family friends businesses?

Deciding not to argue that makes sense 👍
In regard to Trump Jr., were any laws broken?

Kimberly got her just reward. She was fired.
 
Lol. Can you imagine the howling you fucking MAGA retards would do if Malia Obama had a wedding paid by Russians or really any foreign agents.

Such hypocrites.
Eric's frantic howling that the standard-issue MAGA partisan would deploy a symphony of righteous indignation if Malia Obama were to accept a wedding funded by a cabal of foreign agents is a magnificent exhibition of the low-IQ mind at play. To our earnest, simple-minded creature, steeped in the theology of the evening broadcast, this is imagined to be a lethal, checkmate-delivery of intellectual lightning. You'd think he was a rooster on a dunghill, entirely convinced they have unmasked a grand, unprecedented historical hypocrisy. But while he sweats and fumes over these tribal theatrics, the practical world continues to turn on hard work and greenbacks. To get into a lather because politicians and their kin behave precisely like politicians and their kin has been the chief recreation of the half-witted since the days of the Pharaohs, and it remains just as pointless today.
 
Eric's frantic howling that the standard-issue MAGA partisan would deploy a symphony of righteous indignation if Malia Obama were to accept a wedding funded by a cabal of foreign agents is a magnificent exhibition of the low-IQ mind at play. To our earnest, simple-minded creature, steeped in the theology of the evening broadcast, this is imagined to be a lethal, checkmate-delivery of intellectual lightning. You'd think he was a rooster on a dunghill, entirely convinced they have unmasked a grand, unprecedented historical hypocrisy. But while he sweats and fumes over these tribal theatrics, the practical world continues to turn on hard work and greenbacks. To get into a lather because politicians and their kin behave precisely like politicians and their kin has been the chief recreation of the half-witted since the days of the Pharaohs, and it remains just as pointless today.
You are at least 75 years old, Jack.
 
Eric's frantic howling that the standard-issue MAGA partisan would deploy a symphony of righteous indignation if Malia Obama were to accept a wedding funded by a cabal of foreign agents is a magnificent exhibition of the low-IQ mind at play. To our earnest, simple-minded creature, steeped in the theology of the evening broadcast, this is imagined to be a lethal, checkmate-delivery of intellectual lightning. You'd think he was a rooster on a dunghill, entirely convinced they have unmasked a grand, unprecedented historical hypocrisy. But while he sweats and fumes over these tribal theatrics, the practical world continues to turn on hard work and greenbacks. To get into a lather because politicians and their kin behave precisely like politicians and their kin has been the chief recreation of the half-witted since the days of the Pharaohs, and it remains just as pointless today.
Dude, give up trying to write in the style of Jane Austen. You suck at it.

Well, your AI bot does anyway.
 
Eric's frantic howling that the standard-issue MAGA partisan would deploy a symphony of righteous indignation if Malia Obama were to accept a wedding funded by a cabal of foreign agents is a magnificent exhibition of the low-IQ mind at play. To our earnest, simple-minded creature, steeped in the theology of the evening broadcast, this is imagined to be a lethal, checkmate-delivery of intellectual lightning. You'd think he was a rooster on a dunghill, entirely convinced they have unmasked a grand, unprecedented historical hypocrisy. But while he sweats and fumes over these tribal theatrics, the practical world continues to turn on hard work and greenbacks. To get into a lather because politicians and their kin behave precisely like politicians and their kin has been the chief recreation of the half-witted since the days of the Pharaohs, and it remains just as pointless today.
This is not a denial, it is a deflection via bloviation.
 
This is not a denial, it is a deflection via bloviation.
Eric's naive attempt to manufacture a high-voltage scandal out of this private transactional commerce suffers from a complete absence of elementary thought. The simple truth, unbearable to the professional hyperventilators of Literotica, is that both parties are entirely private citizens, completely free under the law to accept whatever voluntary donation or extravagant gesture a wealthy benefactor cares to fling their way for a family ceremony.

Because neither holds a shred of public office or handles a single lever of state authority, the entire business possesses all the geopolitical significance of a dispute over a grocery bill and deserves not a single moment of real concern for intelligent people. :rolleyes:
 
Eric's naive attempt to manufacture a high-voltage scandal out of this private transactional commerce suffers from a complete absence of elementary thought. The simple truth, unbearable to the professional hyperventilators of Literotica, is that both parties are entirely private citizens, completely free under the law to accept whatever voluntary donation or extravagant gesture a wealthy benefactor cares to fling their way for a family ceremony.

Because neither holds a shred of public office or handles a single lever of state authority, the entire business possesses all the geopolitical significance of a dispute over a grocery bill and deserves not a single moment of real concern for intelligent people. :rolleyes:
:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

More bloviation, more deflection and yet not a single cogent thought that addresses the original post.

"Prose is architecture, not interior decoration, and the Baroque is over."
- Ernest Hemingway
 
What the fuck does 'a shred of public office' or 'a single lever of state authority' mean?
This is what happens when he uses Mad Libs random phrase generators in his word processor.

I get secondhand embarrassment seeing him post this tiresome bloviation day after day. Because you just know that he considers himself an accomplished wordsmith when any academic would roll their eyes at his wordy drivel if it came across their desks.
 
:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:

More bloviation, more deflection and yet not a single cogent thought that addresses the original post.

"Prose is architecture, not interior decoration, and the Baroque is over."
- Ernest Hemingway
The original post would elicit no howling among the educated for the reasons I already explained.

Oh, and that Hemingway chestnut you offered, as if it were a lethal, checkmate-delivery of literary lightning, was an exhibition of a pedestrian mind at work. What you completely fail to grasp, in your rush to enforce the local laws of stylistic austerity, is that Hemingway’s celebrated "architecture" was frequently just a polite alias for his profound poverty of vocabulary. To pretend that the English language, that vast, roaring, magnificent ocean of words, must be permanently restricted to the rhythm of a telegraph operator simply because a twentieth-century sporting gentleman had a fondness for short sentences is a piece of pastoral innocence that would stagger an illiterate. :D
 
The original post would elicit no howling among the educated for the reasons I already explained.

Oh, and that Hemingway chestnut you offered, as if it were a lethal, checkmate-delivery of literary lightning, was an exhibition of a pedestrian mind at work. What you completely fail to grasp, in your rush to enforce the local laws of stylistic austerity, is that Hemingway’s celebrated "architecture" was frequently just a polite alias for his profound poverty of vocabulary. To pretend that the English language, that vast, roaring, magnificent ocean of words, must be permanently restricted to the rhythm of a telegraph operator simply because a twentieth-century sporting gentleman had a fondness for short sentences is a piece of pastoral innocence that would stagger an illiterate. :D

Claiming that an owner of a Nobel Prize in literature who is widely recognized as one of the most influential writers of the twentieth century, whose writings are studied in almost all US high school and college classrooms, suffers from a limited vocabulary is.. asinine.

Thank you for demonstrating your lack of intellect and moronic imbecility for all of us to marvel at.
 
Last edited:
The original post would elicit no howling among the educated for the reasons I already explained.

Oh, and that Hemingway chestnut you offered, as if it were a lethal, checkmate-delivery of literary lightning, was an exhibition of a pedestrian mind at work. What you completely fail to grasp, in your rush to enforce the local laws of stylistic austerity, is that Hemingway’s celebrated "architecture" was frequently just a polite alias for his profound poverty of vocabulary. To pretend that the English language, that vast, roaring, magnificent ocean of words, must be permanently restricted to the rhythm of a telegraph operator simply because a twentieth-century sporting gentleman had a fondness for short sentences is a piece of pastoral innocence that would stagger an illiterate. :D
How does a demonstration of pastoral innocence “stagger an illiterate”? I’ve been trying to pick this metaphor apart and I’m coming up empty.

ChatGPT does this all the time. It spits out highfalutin prose that sounds deep and portentous, but when you read it closely, collapses into a pile of sawdust.
 
Back
Top