Time Magazine mic drop

It was a complete sentence, fucktardo.

YOU of all fucktards on this site have no business running around calling others "uneducated" LOL
He was referring to the apostrophe you used that had no place in what you wrote.

Hope this helps, chan.
 
OH LOOK🄸 Al Green has resurrected himself from political irrelevance, but still irrelevant.
Now the retard has been reduced to shaking his cane. Did you see he's already offered article of impeachment against Trump?
 
Here is my ode to Politruk:

He shouts and stomps, his arms held high,
A rebel’s fire in his eye.
Yet every cause he takes to fight,
Somehow turns out not quite right.

With slogans bold and facts so thin,
He dives headfirst, yet cannot swim.
Each tweet a storm, each post a stand,
But truth slips right out of his hand.

But someday time may dull the flame,
And wisdom call him by his name.
Through trial, error, loss, and strife,
He may yet learn the ways of life.
Isn’t AI šŸ¤–šŸ–²ļø fun? šŸ˜„
 
It must be like a cactus suppository to see Musk as an appointed Federal official using his team of geniuses and their highly advanced algorithms to ferret out all of the criminal activity the Democrat left and Deep State conspirators have perpetrated on the American people. It puts a smile on one's face.
You're totally not in a cult.
 
Haha,

Trump was just asked about the cover

He said

Are they still in business, I didn't know

Tee hee
He certainly knew a few weeks ago when they made him "Person of the Year." Guess it's a memory problem.

Wait, isn't that what sunk Biden? How about we stop electing old (wo)men to office? For starters, they won't be around to suffer from either the messes they make or to bear the criticism for making them.

What exactly was wrong with a choice for president between a 47 year-old and a 43 year-old? Both were Senators already, a high federal office neither Trump, GW, Clinton, GHW, Reagan, Carter or Ford held thereafter before becoming president. (The contraries were Biden, Obama, Nixon and LBJ, in case anyone's keeping score at home.)

If you widen the search criteria to any federal elective office, move GHW and Ford over to the second group.
 
Scientific consensus:

A scientific consensus is reached when the vast majority of the scientists involved in a discipline broadly agree on the interpretation of the evidence pertaining to a specific scientific question. When this occurs the case can be considered to have been demonstrated and the burden of proof then falls on those who would dispute the consensus. The following national and international organizations are part of the consensus that global warming is a real phenomenon for which humans are responsible:[28]

  • National Academy of Sciences (NAS)
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
  • NASA's Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS)
  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
  • Royal Society (UK)
  • Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society (CMOS)
  • UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
  • And many more.
Though some have taken non-committal stances, the vast majority of scientific bodies are convinced by the evidence.[note 3] In addition, those pinko tree-huggers at the Pentagon now rank global warming as a "destabilizing force" (damn enviro-weenies).[29][30]

Despite the clarity of the facts, behavioral/social science tells us that simply shoving global warming related scientific data into their face simply solidifies their existing beliefs.[31] There's even a college offering free online classes that teaches you both the science of what is going on and how to fight denialism properly.[32]
 
Back
Top