Trump is finally...

[BotanyBoy]

Good luck with that, little fella.

Omar got almost 50% of the primary vote as a first-time candidate in a crowded field of six Democrats.

She represents the fifth most liberal Congressional district in the United States (real liberal, not this BotanyBoy "I am technically a liberal" revisionist horseshit).

She's got as "safe" a seat as you're likely to see in Congress, and is not going anywhere else anytime soon...except perhaps the Senate.

Oh look...Rob doesn't know what liberalism is...educate yourself for once.

Liberalism
POLITICS

Liberalism, political doctrine that takes protecting and enhancing the freedom of the individual to be the central problem of politics.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/liberalism

See Rob is still trying to conflate liberalism with his brand of anti-liberty, highly authoritarian collectivism.... socialism.

Hard to be a liberal as an authoritarian stain such as yourself Rob.

Hard to love the USA when you consider it's founding and core ideology "toxic shit sludge"

Keep that tail tucked you know you can't refute me......all you've got is ascription, deflection and racial slurs.

Why do you hate the USA so much??

 

[HisArpy]

It's all about the outrage at Trump......not about the content of the words or behavior or the speakers.

Like I said, it's TDS.

If I'd given my life for my Country, I'd be proud that someone decided to say something about how I knew the risks when I signed up, but I decided to make my stand anyway.

To say something like; "The risks were high, but he stepped up and faced them head on knowing he might lose that gamble." would be high praise.

Yet, to some, those words are slanderous. Merely because they need them to be in order to justify their hatred of self which they project onto others.

It also shows that those who repeat that crap have never bothered to serve. Whether it's because they believe they are too privileged, or they are too cowardly, is irrelevant; they didn't serve. Thus, they do not understand the moment when courage compels you to stand up.

 

[about_average]

I got it. What you aren't getting, because poutrage, is that the WORDS are irrelevant to what you are trying to prove.

You're whining about the words someone said to someone else and trying to make those words into a controversy to prove that the speaker "is a meanie".

Grow the fuck up.

Go back and read the thread so you know what you're talking about.

Or shut the fuck up.

 

[about_average]

The USS Cole was a terrorist attack which Al-Qaeda took responsibility for. Al-Qaeda does not like to share their deadly deeds. The U.S. courts held Iran and Sudan liable monetarily. You must get your facts from msnbc.

FYPFY

What was stated by you originally was a country attacking the U.S. and you brought up terrorist organizations
( marine barracks and the Cole ) which are not countries. Your fucking conversations are convoluted and you don't know what the fuck your talking about.

Utter bullshit.
Quote it. You still haven't learned how to follow a thread have you?

 

[Kantarii]

Oh look...Rob doesn't know what liberalism is...educate yourself for once.



https://www.britannica.com/topic/liberalism

See Rob is still trying to conflate liberalism with his brand of anti-liberty, highly authoritarian collectivism.... socialism.

Hard to be a liberal as an authoritarian stain such as yourself Rob.

Hard to love the USA when you consider it's founding and core ideology "toxic shit sludge"

Keep that tail tucked you know you can't refute me......all you've got is ascription, deflection and racial slurs.

Why do you hate the USA so much??

Hahaha... He cracked me up when he said “ a crowded field of 6 Democrats” as if it was crazy crowded like the 20+ Democrats running for President.

 

[Kantarii]

FYPFY


Utter bullshit.
Quote it. You still haven't learned how to follow a thread have you?

Most people aren’t going to scroll through 76 pages on a thread to quote something just for your convenience. If you wanna do that, like you are, go ahead. When you jumped onto this thread, some of the things you are quoting and sharing opinions on were from days before.

 

[Rightguide]

War games in the Persian Gulf.

https://www.checkpointasia.net/that...t-its-carrier-group-to-the-bottom-of-the-sea/

The trouble with war games are the constraints placed on the participants. Any nation state sending an American carrier group to the bottom would be on the receiving end of a nuclear response.

 

[icanhelp1]

FYPFY


Utter bullshit.
Quote it. You still haven't learned how to follow a thread have you?

On 4 November 2002, Qaed Salim Sinan al-Harethi, a suspected al-Qaeda operative, who is believed to have planned the Cole attack, was killed in Yemen by the CIA using an AGM-114 Hellfire missile launched from an MQ-1 Predator drone.

 

[Kantarii]

The trouble with war games are the constraints placed on the participants. Any nation state sending an American carrier group to the bottom would be on the receiving end of a nuclear response.

Iran has nothing in they’re arsenal capable of holding off just one US carrier strike group long enough to send it to the bottom of the Gulf. All Hell would rain down after their first shot.

 

[icanhelp1]

The trouble with war games are the constraints placed on the participants. Any nation state sending an American carrier group to the bottom would be on the receiving end of a nuclear response.

Most commanders participating in war games are given problems that are almost impossible to solve or win. The main objective is to create hypothetical situations that give commanders all they can handle and then rated on their ability to use critical thinking and to apply military doctrine ( past training practices ). Often times doctrine is amended based on the results of the game after intensive after action reviews and reports.

War games are not training exercises per/se; more about using their past training experiences and applying it to a problem. How to deploy weapon systems, intel, personnel, ancillary support systems and other resources. The ability to use what is available and using them as combat multipliers.

The games are designed for both conventional and Asymmetrical threats.

Games are also used to evaluate a units combat proficiency and readiness and used throughout all branches of the military.

 

[about_average]

Most people aren’t going to scroll through 76 pages on a thread to quote something just for your convenience. If you wanna do that, like you are, go ahead. When you jumped onto this thread, some of the things you are quoting and sharing opinions on were from days before.

It all comes down to put up or shut up.
If someone can't provide any factual basis to a claim then it's bull shit and I'll call it that.

Not sure why I'm bothering replying to you though, you're another who makes claims based on some fantasy in your head, with zero facts, and when your BS is proven to be what it is, you just ignore it.
I can see why you love Trump so much, you don't take any responsibility for your actions (statements) Must be an admirable quality you find in him.

 

[about_average]

The trouble with war games are the constraints placed on the participants. Any nation state sending an American carrier group to the bottom would be on the receiving end of a nuclear response.

Did you even read the article? The red team was the one that had constraints put on it.

Iran has nothing in they’re arsenal capable of holding off just one US carrier strike group long enough to send it to the bottom of the Gulf. All Hell would rain down after their first shot.

Yeah, I'm sure you know more about it than the pentagon.
Are you another person who is "smarter than all the generals"?

 

[BotanyBoy]

I can see why you love Trump so much, you don't take any responsibility for your actions (statements) Must be an admirable quality you find in him.

Learned from the best, all those NY Democrats LMFAO!!!

 

[about_average]

Most commanders participating in war games are given problems that are almost impossible to solve or win.

And they weren't able to, at least not until the red team was put under artificial restrictions.
I'm sure our adversaries will abide by those restrictions so all is good.

 

[Kantarii]

It all comes down to put up or shut up.
If someone can't provide any factual basis to a claim then it's bull shit and I'll call it that.

Not sure why I'm bothering replying to you though, you're another who makes claims based on some fantasy in your head, with zero facts, and when your BS is proven to be what it is, you just ignore it.
I can see why you love Trump so much, you don't take any responsibility for your actions (statements) Must be an admirable quality you find in him.

I don’t know why I’m bothering to reply to you either but it boils down to you being just another run-of-the-mill poster not smart enough to realize I’m not OBLIGATED to defend my views to you. If you really want fucking facts, then google them yourself or shut the fuck up and stop quoting me. Answers to your questions can be found anywhere on the web.

So fuck you and your demand that I need to defend shit to you - it’s my opinion.

I take responsibility and answer for my actions every day I walk out my front door identiting as a transvestite.

 

[Rightguide]

Did you even read the article? The red team was the one that had constraints put on it.

I was speaking in general terms. I didn't need to read the article in order to comment on a subject in which I know as much or more than you.

 

[Kantarii]

I was speaking in general terms. I didn't need to read the article in order to comment on a subject in which I know as much or more than you.

I get the feeling he wants to argue just for the sake of arguing. Like it will change either of our opinions.

 

[Kantarii]

Did you even read the article? The red team was the one that had constraints put on it.

Yeah, I'm sure you know more about it than the pentagon.
Are you another person who is "smarter than all the generals"?

I don’t have to be smarter than all the generals, just smarter than you to know an opinion is just an opinion- that when someone demands facts from someone’s opinion, then they are too lazy to do their own legwork.

So keep that Liberal thinking bullshit on the other side of Atlanta.

 

[Rightguide]

I get the feeling he wants to argue just for the sake of arguing. Like it will change either of our opinions.

He's a doctrinaire leftist with a grating disinterest in facts. He has a well developed level of intellectual dishonesty which he employs in order to throw shade on uncomfortable truth, with less than average success. So, there is little to be gained by an exchange of ideas with him except what I just explained above.

 

[Kantarii]

He's a doctrinaire leftist with a grating disinterest in facts. He has a well developed level of intellectual dishonesty which he employs in order to throw shade on uncomfortable truth, with less than average success. So, there is little to be gained by an exchange of ideas with him except what I just explained above.

It’s called unrealistic expectations. He actually expects you to back your personal opinion up with facts without going to look for answers himself. He needs to turn off CNN or NBC and watch Fox News. At least that way he would get professional opinions and proven facts.

 

[about_average]

I was speaking in general terms. I didn't need to read the article in order to comment on a subject in which I know as much or more than you.

So you know the concept of a red team was started by Pope Gregory IX in 1234? Cool, I'm impressed.
And good to know you know more about the exercise than Marine Corps Lieutenant General Paul Van Riper and Lieutenant General Burwell B. Bell III.

Tell us again how Bergdahl would have been executed in WWII.

I don’t have to be smarter than a general, just smarter than you to know an opinion is just an opinion- that when someone demands facts from someone’s opinion, then they are too lazy to do their own legwork.

I'm pretty sure Burwell wasn't stating an "opinion".
Or are you conflating two entirely different topics?

 

[about_average]

He's a doctrinaire leftist with a grating disinterest in facts.

LOL
Says the man who claims things like:
Bergdahl would have been executed in WWII
and
Comey said the Steele dossier was "salacious and unverified".

 

[Rightguide]

It’s called unrealistic expectations. He actually expects you to back your personal opinion up with facts without going to look for answers himself. He needs to turn off CNN or NBC and watch Fox News. At least that way he would get professional opinions and proven facts.

He would ignore them if you did. It's a game with him.

 

[about_average]

It’s called unrealistic expectations. He actually expects you to back your personal opinion up with facts without going to look for answers himself. He needs to turn off CNN or NBC and watch Fox News. At least that way he would get professional opinions and proven facts.

Yeah, I could learn "proven facts" like how Trump sent his private jet to fly home members of the 8th Tank Battalion when they returned from Operation Desert Storm.
LMAO

 

[zipman]

It’s called unrealistic expectations. He actually expects you to back your personal opinion up with facts without going to look for answers himself. He needs to turn off CNN or NBC and watch Fox News. At least that way he would get professional opinions and proven facts.

Bwahahahahaha!!

Best laugh I've had in a while.