Trumptards

Carnal_Flower

Literotica Guru
Joined
May 31, 2014
Posts
7,056
Trumptards don't care that Trump is a lying hypocritical shitstain on humanity.

The dum dums have a chief dum dum, which proves being a dum dum is ok.

He can cheat with big-titted ho's, pay for secret abortions, say one thing do another the next day, destroy the environment, bend over for a foreign dictator, it's all ok because they scratched their ass, pulled a lever, and got a stupid in office.
 
Trumptards don't care that Trump is a lying hypocritical shitstain on humanity.

The dum dums have a chief dum dum, which proves being a dum dum is ok.

He can cheat with big-titted ho's, pay for secret abortions, say one thing do another the next day, destroy the environment, bend over for a foreign dictator, it's all ok because they scratched their ass, pulled a lever, and got a stupid in office.

Has he lied under oath?
 
Has he lied under oath?

That's your standard? He'll lie under oath as soon as he testifies under oath. He can't help himself. That's what he is. A liar. That's why his "team" will do anything to prevent him being interviewed by Mueller or testifying anywhere under oath.

Did you hear Kelly Ann Conway yesterday when asked about his lies? She said he tells the truth and brought up two campaign promises which he kept. He literallly lies multiple times every day but he's not a liar because from time to time he does something he said he would do? YGBFKM!
 
That's your standard? He'll lie under oath as soon as he testifies under oath. He can't help himself. That's what he is. A liar. That's why his "team" will do anything to prevent him being interviewed by Mueller or testifying anywhere under oath.

If you ran a company like Apple would you allow some inferior employee to command you to appear in his office and explain what your thinking was when you decided he didn't deserve his raise, or would you tell your HR department to handle it?
 
If you ran a company like Apple would you allow some inferior employee to command you to appear in his office and explain what your thinking was when you decided he didn't deserve his raise, or would you tell your HR department to handle it?

Wow. Just, wow. Yep. "Mr. Cook, the FBI is here to arrest you for laundering money for the Russian mafia." "Ok, thanks. Send them down to HR and have them handle it "
 
Wow. Just, wow. Yep. "Mr. Cook, the FBI is here to arrest you for laundering money for the Russian mafia." "Ok, thanks. Send them down to HR and have them handle it "

Under the present law the President cannot be forced to appear before a grand jury or prosecuted while in office. The President does not have to answer questions as to his thinking when exercising his Article II constitutional authority. Nobody in the executive branch is superior to the President of the United States, nobody. Robert Mueller does not have the authority to subpoena the President, and if he refuses a subpoena and takes it to the SCOTUS you will be instructed in the truth of what I just said.

Oh, and Congress does not have the Constitutional authority to diminish the Article Ii powers of the President by legislation either.
 
Nobody in the executive branch is superior to the President of the United States, nobody.

EVERYBODY in the executive branch is probably superior to Donald Trump. Oh, that's right. You said "Under the law."
 
EVERYBODY in the executive branch is probably superior to Donald Trump. Oh, that's right. You said "Under the law."

I'm sure resting on the soft pillows of studied ignorance has always been a reassuring and comfortably warm place for you. So, do enjoy yourself.:rolleyes::D
 
I'm sure resting on the soft pillows of studied ignorance has always been a reassuring and comfortably warm place for you. So, do enjoy yourself.:rolleyes::D

You forgot the obligatory wang or ass crack in your reply, vette. Slipping up??


The guy is a well known liar and cheat.. he even contradicts his lies with other lies. Why would you defend him? Oh yeah, you're a liar too.
 
I love how all the people wailing about his lies....have no problem with Obamas lies.


Never bring up any scum bag shit (D)'s do.

Even when it's right in their faces, as long as whatever turd they are buying came from a (D)emocrats colon they will hold their nose, eat up and say YUMMM!!!!

LOL how'd that hope n' change turn out for you? :D
 
I love how all the people wailing about his lies....have no problem with Obamas lies.


Never bring up any scum bag shit (D)'s do.

Even when it's right in their faces, as long as whatever turd they are buying came from a (D)emocrats colon they will hold their nose, eat up and say YUMMM!!!!

LOL how'd that hope n' change turn out for you? :D

Hey everybody, SQUIRREL!!!
 
I love how all the people wailing about his lies....have no problem with Obamas lies.


Never bring up any scum bag shit (D)'s do.

Even when it's right in their faces, as long as whatever turd they are buying came from a (D)emocrats colon they will hold their nose, eat up and say YUMMM!!!!

LOL how'd that hope n' change turn out for you? :D

Dumbass.

http://swampland.time.com/2012/08/23/the-party-of-no-new-details-on-the-gop-plot-to-obstruct-obama/

Republican plot to obstruct President Obama before he even took office, including secret meetings led by House GOP whip Eric Cantor (in December 2008) and Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell (in early January 2009) in which they laid out their daring (though cynical and political) no-honeymoon strategy of all-out resistance to a popular President-elect during an economic emergency. “If he was for it,” former Ohio Senator George Voinovich explained, “we had to be against it.” The excerpt includes a special bonus nugget of Mitt Romney dissing the Tea Party.
 
I love how all the people wailing about his lies....have no problem with Obamas lies.


Never bring up any scum bag shit (D)'s do.

Even when it's right in their faces, as long as whatever turd they are buying came from a (D)emocrats colon they will hold their nose, eat up and say YUMMM!!!!

LOL how'd that hope n' change turn out for you? :D

Wow. Look in the mirror buddy.
 
LOL that was easy.

Look at all the totally irrelevant replies....only one of which was mildly interesting.


Hey everybody, SQUIRREL!!!

Dumbass.

http://swampland.time.com/2012/08/23/the-party-of-no-new-details-on-the-gop-plot-to-obstruct-obama/

Republican plot to obstruct President Obama before he even took office, including secret meetings led by House GOP whip Eric Cantor (in December 2008) and Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell (in early January 2009) in which they laid out their daring (though cynical and political) no-honeymoon strategy of all-out resistance to a popular President-elect during an economic emergency. “If he was for it,” former Ohio Senator George Voinovich explained, “we had to be against it.” The excerpt includes a special bonus nugget of Mitt Romney dissing the Tea Party.

Wow. Look in the mirror buddy.

Why?

"It's ONLY bad when someone from the other party does it!" isn't my motto...it's yours. ;)
 
Last edited:
I love how all the people wailing about his lies....have no problem with Obamas lies.

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • DB68410B-735B-4ACE-A242-BBB1036C0C4E.jpeg
    DB68410B-735B-4ACE-A242-BBB1036C0C4E.jpeg
    36.9 KB · Views: 0

So, Botany Boy, Wounded Knee, and Rightguide are back to vigorously defending their hero. Might be good to come back and review all of these statements in several years, and remind their future alts about their vigorous support for a lying moron.
 
Under the present law the President cannot be forced to appear before a grand jury or prosecuted while in office.

One right, one wrong. The President does not have to appear before a grand jury. At least, that's as it stands now, since this question has not gone before the courts.

A President can be prosecuted while in office for crimes committed outside the office. In the con artist's case, he colluded with the Russians before he assumed power. Depending on what else Mueller has found, this may extend to money laundering as well.

In the case of Bill Clinton, the Jones suit was also about what happened before Bill took office. Here are Kenneth Starr's own words on the matter:

“It is proper, constitutional, and legal for a federal grand jury to indict a sitting president for serious criminal acts that are not part of, and are contrary to, the president’s official duties,” the Starr office memo concludes. “In this country, no one, even President Clinton, is above the law.”​

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/22/us/politics/can-president-be-indicted-kenneth-starr-memo.html

Robert Mueller does not have the authority to subpoena the President,

Yes, he does. Whether the con artist has to answer it is the issue.

and if he refuses a subpoena and takes it to the SCOTUS you will be instructed in the truth of what I just said.

Which was shown to be wrong.

Oh, and Congress does not have the Constitutional authority to diminish the Article Ii powers of the President by legislation either.

That part is correct. However, the Constitution can always be amended by the people.

As a side note, just because the Constitution doesn't say a sitting president can't be prosecuted, does not mean it can't happen (watch the double negatives). Think of it like the 9th Amendment. That catch-all amendment was explicitly put in by Madison to cover everything not mentioned in the Bill of Rights.

I cannot remember who said it, but a presidential candidate once remarked, when asked what they would do as president, "I will do everything the Constitution says I can do, and everything it doesn't say I can't do."

The same with prosecuting a sitting president. Just because it's not there, doesn't mean it can't be done.

For a much more in-depth discussion, see the NY Times article from 1998:

https://www.nytimes.com/1998/01/25/weekinreview/the-nation-a-primer-prosecuting-a-president.html
 
So, Botany Boy, Wounded Knee, and Rightguide are back to vigorously defending their hero. Might be good to come back and review all of these statements in several years, and remind their future alts about their vigorous support for a lying moron.

Let's review all of those from the looney left in the last year or so for some real laughs.
 
All they care about is the fact that they finally elected a piece of white trash like them. Nothing else. He's their "Superman" taking on the "elites"--i.e. people more educated than they are. They can't stand the fact that a Negro was better spoken and more accomplished than they could ever dream of being. If Obama could succeed, then the Presidency is a worthless flophouse and we should have our guy inside to shit all over it.

They elected Trump to pee all over Obama's bed, and they love it. That's all they got. We won and now we can pee all over everything. Nothing else matters.

They luuurve his lies. They relish every fart that comes out of his fat ass. It's no use arguing facts.

It's a big F You from the resentful "working class." They love him because of exactly who he is: stupid, lazy, fat, uninformed, a liar, a braggart, delusional, out of his depths. Finally they can get back at all the stuck-up people who did better than they did in school.

Trump's lies and everything he says and does are just pee and shit. The Trumptards clap their hands in joy.
 
Trumptards don't care that Trump is a lying hypocritical shitstain on humanity.

The dum dums have a chief dum dum, which proves being a dum dum is ok.

He can cheat with big-titted ho's, pay for secret abortions, say one thing do another the next day, destroy the environment, bend over for a foreign dictator, it's all ok because they scratched their ass, pulled a lever, and got a stupid in office.



He is white and a repug, just like themselves. So no matter how degenerate he gets, they love that.


They are degenerates themselves.
 
Back
Top