Two Weeks Until the Heart of Darkness

Israel's Interior Minister Arye Deri says that Donald Trump's election heralds the coming of The Messiah.

Apparently, the swamp to be drained is full of non-Orthodox Jews. Once they're gone, Orthodox Jews can have their way again.

http://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Trumps-election-heralds-coming-of-Messiah-says-Deri-472282

“There is no doubt that one can give thanks to God that all those who have damned the [Jewish] covenant and would wipe out Judaism, thinking they could take control over the Land of Israel here and lead reforms in order to cause destruction received their blow,” Deri said during an address to the local religious council of Ashdod.

“Their influence and the great threat they posed to us because they held [control over] the US government...

They understand that this power has disappeared and we can continue, God willing, to strengthen traditional religion and Judaism, transmitted down to us from generation to generation.”

Trump’s election, he added, presages the coming of the Messianic Age.

“If such a miracle can happen, we have already reached the days of the Messiah. Therefore, we are really in the era of the birth pangs of the Messiah when everything has been flipped to the good of the Jewish people.”

Senior United Torah Judaism leader MK Moshe Gafni was of similar mind, predicting that Reform and Conservative influence in Israel would now wane.

According to a report on the Kikar Hashabbat haredi-news website, Gafni told close associates this was his “hope” and expectation.

“The Right has risen, along with more conservative stances,” said the MK, saying he believes the non-Orthodox Jewish leadership had worked against Trump during the campaign.
 
Where is all the murdering and raping going on?

Oh that's right...major lefty metro areas. :D

Guess who put his house up for sale in one of those areas. Not to far from his library site. Paid 1.5 million property values down about 18% in the area. Wonder why.
 
Guess who put his house up for sale in one of those areas. Not to far from his library site. Paid 1.5 million property values down about 18% in the area. Wonder why.

Well they do have the most strict gun laws in America. Sounds pretty safe, to me.
 
Your place, next Monday. Monday work for everybody?

https://cdn.meme.am/cache/instances/folder651/66510651.jpg

Economic disaster.

That is possible, the guy can't quit fucking with companies and the market...total fucking socialist.

Guess who put his house up for sale in one of those areas. Not to far from his library site. Paid 1.5 million property values down about 18% in the area. Wonder why.

IDK, don't really care......but I'll say wherever he moves we should dump 10,000 Syrian refugees into that neighborhood. :D
 
Just sayin'

What are your worst predictions for a Trump, er, Presidency (cough)

Will we see a war? Will he nuke someone? Will he be impeached? Police state? ....

I think you show yourself not really interested in the answer by the prejudiced way you frame your questions.

I'm tempted to say, no, Snowflake, the USA is not going to become a police state. Trump will not have the power to do that if he wanted to- part of the genius of the Founders of the US of A. Put your little nightmares aside and don't worry about adult questions until you are ready to deal with them.
 
Last edited:
Lol

I've said it before and I'll say it again. You guys think you voted a big dick into office; all you're going to be left with is a flaccid old fool who can't get it up.

I think you show yourself not really interested in the answer by the prejudiced way you frame your questions.

I'm tempted to say, no, Snowflake, the USA is not going to become a police state. Trump will not have the power to do that if he wanted to- part of the genius of the Founders of the US of A. Put your little nightmares aside and don't worry about adult questions until you are ready to deal with them.
 
Lol

I've said it before and I'll say it again. You guys think you voted a big dick into office; all you're going to be left with is a flaccid old fool who can't get it up.

You show once again that you are not interested in a serious discussion. Not only td you pose the wrong questions- some are so off-base as to border on the absurd- but you present with the mindset of thinking about national policy only in sexual terms. And for some reason, you flatter yourself into thinking that you have something worth saying and that you can cast an intelligent vote.

Democracy cannot long endure the onslaught or your mindset into the public sphere.
 
Oh, "national policy" is not about sex?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the wonderful GOP just made defunding Planned Parenthood its top priority.

I didn't say it was "only" about sex. Besides, I was talking in this instance about a metaphorical dimension. (Metaphor: I know it's a big word.)

You show once again that you are not interested in a serious discussion. Not only td you pose the wrong questions- some are so off-base as to border on the absurd- but you present with the mindset of thinking about national policy only in sexual terms. And for some reason, you flatter yourself into thinking that you have something worth saying and that you can cast an intelligent vote.

Democracy cannot long endure the onslaught or your mindset into the public sphere.
 
It's not related?

It's WHAT they want to de-fund and why.

Birth control
Cancer screenings (for women)
Pregnancy and pre-natal care (for women)
Abortion (for women)

i.e., SEX

Take away the funding, you take away all those things, which is pushing a national policy OF SEX

Then why are they after the funding instead of the sex? :D

You just REALLY REALLY wish it was about sex.
 
It's not related?

Sure but it's not the issue.

The money is.

It's WHAT they want to de-fund and why.

Birth control
Cancer screenings (for women)
Pregnancy and pre-natal care (for women)
Abortion (for women)

i.e., SEX

That's not the only aspect of HC they want to defund or why.

They want HC defunded because they don't think it's the job of government to provide HC, at least in theory. Most Republicans are leftist though so that's unlikely to happen, more likely is they will just bastardize ACA to enrich their special interest under the guise of reduction when they should have just shit canned the whole thing.

Take away the funding, you take away all those things, which is pushing a national policy OF SEX

Absolute HORSE SHIT.

It just means you have to spend YOUR money instead of everyone elses....boo hoo.
 
We're talking about PLanned Parenthood.

It's about HC for women, specifically.

Believe what you want, I don't care.

If you DON'T think the Republicans want to push a Christian fundie agenda as it relates to women's health care, shrug.

If you DON'T think this works in concert with their choice for the Supreme Court, shrug

By all means, they can say it's "just about the money," and you can believe what you want

Sure but it's not the issue.

The money is.



That's not the only aspect of HC they want to defund or why.

They want HC defunded because they don't think it's the job of government to provide HC, at least in theory. Most Republicans are leftist though so that's unlikely to happen, more likely is they will just bastardize ACA to enrich their special interest under the guise of reduction when they should have just shit canned the whole thing.



Absolute HORSE SHIT.

It just means you have to spend YOUR money instead of everyone elses....boo hoo.
 
It's about HC for women, specifically.

Only if you ignore all the other shit they don't want to pay for including all HC.

If you DON'T think the Republicans want to push a Christian fundie agenda as it relates to women's health care, shrug.

I never said they didn't.

I said it's simply not the primary argument or point of attack.

They are after the money...not women's health care.

Nothing about what they are doing is stopping women from getting healthcare.

By all means, they can say it's "just about the money," and you can believe what you want

If it's not about the money then why are they going after the funding? :confused:

I'm betting you dodge this one AGAIN.
 
No, it's about women's health.

If that is true then why aren't they banning healthcare for women?

Further more, if it's just about women, why are they trying to shit can HC for men too?

Who goes to work for PP for the money?!

What's that got to do with the price of tea in China?

Gubbmint funding doesn't have shit to do with employment desire.

Schools get BILLIONS of dollars every year....doesn't make me want to be a public babysitting service tech, aka "teacher" (LOL!!!) for 28k a year.
 
Last edited:
You all should be grateful. If Hilary got elected you would be limited in your bitching and whining. Now you have an excuse for every screw up in your pathetic little lives for at least four years. So have a good cry and stay in bed.
 
Back
Top