Us and Israel attack Iranian regime

The Straits of Hormuz, in peaceful times, transit 138 per day.
The total number of ships transiting since March 1st is exactly 9. Two oil supertankers, a couple of cargo ship covered in Chinese flags, and the rest are unknown (they turned their transponders off when transiting)
Kuwait has shut down its major pipeline to its port due to lack of available tankers
LINK

Evidently France's volatile president Emmanuel Macron called the new government and spoke to the new Ayatollah. He demanded that the Straits be opened to French ships transiting or he would send his French navy warships as armed escorts.
The Ayatollah did not sound impressed.
 
Yahoo finance! Lmao the same idiots that claimed the Abraham Lincoln was hit by a missile! If they would of hit 10 ships , Trump and the military would of turned these sand monkeys to DUST! Who hit them and with what? They have no Air Force, they have no Navy! What did they use, bottle rockets? Lol yahoo finance!
 
Yahoo finance! Lmao the same idiots that claimed the Abraham Lincoln was hit by a missile! If they would of hit 10 ships , Trump and the military would of turned these sand monkeys to DUST! Who hit them and with what? They have no Air Force, they have no Navy! What did they use, bottle rockets? Lol yahoo finance!
They hit ten ships and dear leader hasn't done that.

They're using drones you moron, they're using snipers.

You're excited about one ship.......they typically send 100+ a day......they've gotten 10 through since last week.
 
I think more people believe Trump than the communist rum MSM, the very same media Trump is taking down for what? Lying! TRUTH NEVER CHANGES TRUTH ALWAYS WINS, ALWAYS!1000023905.jpg
 
Yahoo finance! Lmao the same idiots that claimed the Abraham Lincoln was hit by a missile! If they would of hit 10 ships , Trump and the military would of turned these sand monkeys to DUST! Who hit them and with what? They have no Air Force, they have no Navy! What did they use, bottle rockets? Lol yahoo finance!
Iran HAS an air force and a navy, has had since the Shah's time.
 
There is no fucking block. The new insurance rates have been set and the policies purchased. The ship channels are open and all that has to happen is for the owners to say, "Go!" So why don't they say go? Easy answer, the cost of shipping crude oil and other similar products is based on a percentage of cargo value. Now go look at the commodities market. Getting the picture now sparky?

Follow the fucking money.............ALWAYS.
 
There is no fucking block. The new insurance rates have been set and the policies purchased. The ship channels are open and all that has to happen is for the owners to say, "Go!" So why don't they say go? Easy answer, the cost of shipping crude oil and other similar products is based on a percentage of cargo value. Now go look at the commodities market. Getting the picture now sparky?

Follow the fucking money.............ALWAYS.
How many ships have made it through in a week?
Versus how many normally make it through.

Get a fucking clue.

If there wasn't a block, the ships wouldn't be stopping.

You can argue semantics, like whether there is a naval blockade or not...the result is the same ....ships not moving.
 
Last edited:
How many ships have made it through in a week?
Versus how many normally make it through.

Get a fucking clue.

If there wasn't a block, the ships wouldn't be stopping.

You can argue semantics, like whether there is a naval blockade or not...the result is the same ....ships not moving.
Still too fucking stupid to figure it out?

If you get paid 2% of cargo value per 1000 miles and you see that cargo values are spiking (in this case 50% increase in value over a week), are you going to carry the cargo at the old price or the new price? I'm sure that even a mind as weak as yours can figure out the answer to that question.

Of course the problem for the owners with this strategy is that price increase is transient and the last one to say "go" is going to lose their shorts. It's a high risk/reward game of musical chairs.
 
If you get paid 2% of cargo value per 1000 miles and you see that cargo values are spiking (in this case 50% increase in value over a week), are you going to carry the cargo at the old price or the new price?
Those are insurance issues bro and have nothing to do with anyone on the ground or at sea 👍🏽
 
Still too fucking stupid to figure it out?

If you get paid 2% of cargo value per 1000 miles and you see that cargo values are spiking (in this case 50% increase in value over a week), are you going to carry the cargo at the old price or the new price? I'm sure that even a mind as weak as yours can figure out the answer to that question.

Of course the problem for the owners with this strategy is that price increase is transient and the last one to say "go" is going to lose their shorts. It's a high risk/reward game of musical chairs.
What you seem to not get is that ships aren't moving through the strait.

That means it isn't open.

Explain that however you need....the President isn't changing that state of things currently.

Only two ships a non Iranian origin have passed through since Friday, when the President declared it safe.
 
Last edited:
One tanker, just one tanker ran the strait yesterday and oil dropped $5/bbl. Got it Sparky?
Normal volume is 100+/day.

Got it sparky?
If tankers aren't moving, the strait isn't open.
And prices won't come down.

You can claim this isn't a big deal all you want....prices go up quickly....but fall slowly
 
One tanker, just one tanker ran the strait yesterday and oil dropped $5/bbl.

And in the real world...

"The widening Iran war has upended oil production and shipping across the Middle East, straining energy supplies worldwide.

Those disruptions caused oil to spike Monday, only for it to swiftly fall back after President Donald Trump suggested the war could be near an end.

The price of Brent crude, the international benchmark, briefly surged to $119.50 per barrel on Monday — its highest level since the summer after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. West Texas Intermediate, which is produced in the U.S., also soared to $119.48 per barrel at one point. But those prices fell to under $90 late Monday, as markets made significant reversals after Trump told CBS News he thinks “the war is very complete.”

Still, that’s much higher than the roughly $70 a barrel crude was selling for before the U.S. and Israel launched the war against Iran on Feb. 28."


Before the war it was around $70 per barrel.
Following big falls yesterday, it is now $90 per barrel.
So a net gain of almost $20 to date.

Of course if Trump was not being entirely honest then Monday's prices give an indication of where the price will be heading, so do not leave any unnecessary lights on just yet.
 
Last edited:
There is no fucking block. The new insurance rates have been set and the policies purchased. The ship channels are open and all that has to happen is for the owners to say, "Go!" So why don't they say go? Easy answer, the cost of shipping crude oil and other similar products is based on a percentage of cargo value. Now go look at the commodities market. Getting the picture now sparky?

Follow the fucking money.............ALWAYS.
You don't know any of this, shit for brains.

Do you really expect anyone here believes that you know how overseas shipping insurance works in wartime? 🤣 😁😆🙃
 
Back
Top