US Constitution

The First Crusade had no intent on occupying the lands they crossed through, but they soon wore out their welcome...


:)
 
As much as I favor a southern border that is truly secure, I don't think there is any credible argument that the "invasion" and "imminent danger" envisioned by Article I is even remotely similar to that characterized by illegal immigration.

aside from disagreeing with this

aside from what ISH responded

this comment by Pvt Turd Class Hogan is akin to the torture debate....to wit, its OK to torture TICKING BOMBS....but who are ticking BOMBS, how do we know BEFORE they explode if we don't "torture"?

why wait till there IS AN INVASION? Assuming we can even agree on what INVASION means?

His and Her Pan ICK Congress assholes are calling us RACISTS and HATERS for trying to stem the flow.....why wont they say that and worse when there is an invasion , or they will call it instead an

INFLUX OF REFUGEES


No....we are lost!
 
On the 'intent' subject..... they have no 'intent' of spreading disease, occupying territory, or consuming resources, but that, in fact, is exactly what they ARE doing and in that respect the results are no different than any invading army.

Ishmael

Your logic says that all underperforming Americans should be eradicated.

Where would you live?
 
aside from disagreeing with this

aside from what ISH responded

this comment by Pvt Turd Class Hogan is akin to the torture debate....to wit, its OK to torture TICKING BOMBS....but who are ticking BOMBS, how do we know BEFORE they explode if we don't "torture"?

why wait till there IS AN INVASION? Assuming we can even agree on what INVASION means?

His and Her Pan ICK Congress assholes are calling us RACISTS and HATERS for trying to stem the flow.....why wont they say that and worse when there is an invasion , or they will call it instead an

INFLUX OF REFUGEES


No....we are lost!

I'm sure you've noticed that that rhetoric has substantially quieted down as the poll results keep coming in and they're finding out how few agree with them.

Ishmael
 
I'm sure you've noticed that that rhetoric has substantially quieted down as the poll results keep coming in and they're finding out how few agree with them.

Ishmael

Im also NOT so sure anyone will dare stand up to HUSSEIN Obama.....they have prepped the battlefield well with the YOU ARE RACIST attacks on one and all


I just posted yet another D who says THEY ALL KNEW HUSSEIN Obama lied about ObamaCare.....yet they will NOT DARE to say or do anything



SO! SUE ME!

Nothing we can do
 
Your logic says that all underperforming Americans should be eradicated.

Where would you live?

Well, first of all my 'logic' doesn't say, doesn't even imply, that.

Where would I live? Costa Rica is looking better all the time.

Ishmael
 
On the 'intent' subject. I'm certain that as individuals, with the exceptions of the criminal enterprises mentioned, they have no 'intent' of spreading disease, occupying territory, or consuming resources, but that, in fact, is exactly what they ARE doing and in that respect the results are no different than any invading army.

Ishmael

There is one difference. An invading army does not vote.
 
Article I, Section 10, 3rd paragraph.

One way to stop the invasion at the border.

Ishmael

No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

The kids from CA are no invasion of the border states nor do they constitute any imminent danger.

Nor are they the kind of problem National Guard troops can solve. Whom are they going to shoot? The kids who are eager to turn themselves over to the immigration authorities as soon as they get here?
 
The kids from CA are no invasion of the border states nor do they constitute any imminent danger.

Nor are they the kind of problem National Guard troops can solve. Whom are they going to shoot? The kids who are eager to turn themselves over to the immigration authorities as soon as they get here?

Awwww, look at you: lobbying so disingenuously "for the children"...

...getting-off fantasizing 'bout a larger prey pool, eh 0?

Why don't you provide the #s of "kids who are eager to turn themselves over to the immigration authorities", compared to the adults who are apprehended illegally entering the country, and then multiply that number by 5 for the number of illegals who enter and aren't caught...

...never mind.
 
Well, first of all my 'logic' doesn't say, doesn't even imply, that.

Where would I live? Costa Rica is looking better all the time.

Ishmael



Yes...Let us first agree that your logic should be italicized.

Second, yes, I expect you'd like Costa Rica...children there don't get mollycoddled by the Government like at the US Border...they get put to work.

Children in Costa Rica engage in the worst forms of child labor, including in dangerous activities in agriculture and commercial sexual exploitation.

US Dept Labor
http://www.dol.gov/ilab/reports/child-labor/costa_rica.htm
 
Awwww, look at you: lobbying so disingenuously "for the children"...

...getting-off fantasizing 'bout a larger prey pool, eh 0?

Why don't you provide the #s of "kids who are eager to turn themselves over to the immigration authorities", compared to the adults who are apprehended illegally entering the country, and then multiply that number by 5 for the number of illegals who enter and aren't caught...

...never mind.

They're no invasion either, and the NG is no use against them either.
 
On the 'intent' subject. I'm certain that as individuals, with the exceptions of the criminal enterprises mentioned, they have no 'intent' of spreading disease, occupying territory, or consuming resources, but that, in fact, is exactly what they ARE doing and in that respect the results are no different than any invading army.

Ishmael


Even the criminal enterprises have no intention of spreading disease, occupying territory or consuming resources. That is not what any of them are doing.
 
Maybe 700 Yards. I could go measure it. Do you want as the crow flies or has the human drives?
 
According to Wiki:

"The Governor can activate National Guard personnel to "State Active Duty" in response to natural or man-made disasters or Homeland Defense missions. State Active Duty is based on State statute and policy as well as State funds. Soldiers and Airmen remain under the command and control of the Governor. The federal Posse Comitatus Act (PCA) does not apply under state active duty status or Title 32 status."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Guard_of_the_United_States#State_Duty

Thanks!
 
Agreed, there are a shit-ton more swarthy brown people coming across the southern border, as opposed to the relative trickle of swarthy brown people crossing from the northern border. Good point there, Harry.

I am so happy that you agree Tinkerbelle.
 
I'm guessing the restraining order says 2000 feet?

Funny. Though I do look at that and think that if we're goign to put those kinds of restrictions on sex offenders we should just execute them. Being more than 5 miles away from a school is fucking impossible where I live.
 
You know immigrants are not invaders, and you know the NG is useless as a border patrol. They're not trained for that.

Immigrants don't enter the country illegally. Immigrants don't pay human traffickers thousands of dollars to "escort" their kids thousands of miles across dangerous third world nations via less then safe means of transportation to enter the country illegally.

No intellectually honest person can refer to these illegal aliens no matter what their age as immigrants.
 
Back
Top