Weaker McCarthy Priority: Protect The Wealthy and Tax Cheats.

[jaF0]

The problem is nobody knows while working if they'll really NEED it or not. Full benefits should not go to those who do not. Pay in, but at Retirement age things change.

My account shows the total deductions taken out while working. Maybe refund that to those who have sufficient other assets. Or even double that. In most cases, that won't be anywhere near what would be paid out in full benefits.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

The problem is nobody knows while working if they'll really NEED it or not. Full benefits should not go to those who do not. Pay in, but at Retirement age things change.

My account shows the total deductions taken out while working. Maybe refund that to those who have sufficient other assets. Or even double that. In most cases, that won't be anywhere near what would be paid out in full benefits.

Your logic is faulty.

It's a "public investment" as opposed to "private investment". By your logic, a person who invests privately, then should have to give back the extra money to the private investment holders, if they don't need it.....sounds kind of like communism to me....

 

[jaF0]

I would prefer they not get it back at all. That would just be an alternative, as a concession of sorts.

 

[KeithD]

I would prefer they not get it back at all. That would just be an alternative, as a concession of sorts.

Because you want someone else's work to subsidize you? Sounds like you might be a Trumper.