SebastianHolt
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2025
- Posts
- 3,691
you really are ten bottles short of a six-packNo, Dem corruption would only serve to STIMULATE the conservative intellect.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you really are ten bottles short of a six-packNo, Dem corruption would only serve to STIMULATE the conservative intellect.
you really are ten bottles short of a six-pack
Irrelevant, and also not quite true. He won a plurality of the popular vote, but not a majority.He was voting into office by a majority by both the electoral college and the popular vote.
The Democrats didn't imagine Trump trying to bribe a foreign official or inciting an insurrection, no matter how many times you say that.That used to mean something. Democrats produced a hoax and attempted to impeach him twice not based on evidence but because of hatred.
I'm sure that made perfect sense when Hannity or whoever said it, but you can't even name the policies in question. That says a lot.There were no high crimes. The evidence is clear. Most of Trump’s policies today were popular to democrats back in the 90s, now, today because it’s Trump, and the hatred for Trump is off the rails Dems have done a 180.
Overlooking the fact that you seem to define "extreme left" as anyone who disagrees with you, the fact is his negative view of the president is in fact very, very popular nearly everywhere in the world. Including the USA.Murphy’s ideology is popular among the extreme left, that doesn’t represent the majority.
So we've established that you don't understand NATO or the World Bank any more than Trump does. Noted.Trump is pushing back against the EU, western Europe, NATO and the world bank. Long overdue. They’ve been playing us for suckers for decades and people like you are blind to it. Finally we have a president willing to break ranks and start putting America first.
No. The 2024 election was stolen; Trump was never legitimately elected by the people or congress. At least, this has never been disproven. Unlike 2020 (See what I did there?) But even if you argue otherwise, by now it is clear that the majority of Americans do NOT approve of his actions, particularly with regard to Iran.He was voting into office by a majority by both the electoral college and the popular vote. That used to mean something. Democrats produced a hoax and attempted to impeach him twice not based on evidence but because of hatred. There were no high crimes. The evidence is clear. Most of Trump’s policies today were popular to democrats back in the 90s, now, today because it’s Trump, and the hatred for Trump is off the rails Dems have done a 180.
Trump's attacks on Iran and Venezuela are damaging America's standing abroad, this is not putting America first. Threatening invasions of Greenland, Cuba and Canada is not putting America first, it is destroying America's credibility on the world stage, paving way for Russia and China to gain influence on the world stage. Which is exactly what his pushing back on NATO is doing. Do you WANT China and Russia to dominate over America in global economic and military policy? Sure seems like you do.You’re petty,
Murphy’s ideology is popular among the extreme left, that doesn’t represent the majority.
Trump is pushing back against the EU, western Europe, NATO and the world bank. Long overdue. They’ve been playing us for suckers for decades and people like you are blind to it. Finally we have a president willing to break ranks and start putting America first.
The first four Raisins were worth a hundred dollars 25 years ago. I have the whole set so they are probably worth a fortune. A lot more than your collection of Pokemen.
Once again, false. Once again you show that you don't know what you're talking about. VDH is one good example. There are many more.When Movement Conservatism got started in 1964, its public faces were at least pseudo-cerebral types like William F. Buckley and George Will.
But it is a very long time, now, since American conservatism has been able to rise above the intellectual level of a claymation Christmas special. It is a very long desclension from Buckley and Will to Beck and Carlson.
Why IS that?
Completely not true. It's a spending problem. Five times we've cut tax rates and revenues hve increased every time. Unfortunately, spending has increased faster.
100% true.Dems love to make poor people poorer. They love creating a dependent class of people, it gets them votes. They love giving freebies at other's expense.
Then why did the national debt triple under Reagan? From the end of the Second World War the national debt as a percentage of gross domestic product declined. It declined during the Korean War and the War in Vietnam.Completely not true. It's a spending problem. Five times we've cut tax rates and revenues hve increased every time. Unfortunately, spending has increased faster.
Welfare recipients rarely vote. The War on Poverty was misguided but well intended.Dems love to make poor people poorer. They love creating a dependent class of people, it gets them votes. They love giving freebies at other's expense.
That only works for the very low-paid. Give a poor person a dollar and they spend it at the local store, benefitting local people who also spend the benefit on local goods/services. Each transaction raises tax revenue.Completely not true. It's a spending problem. Five times we've cut tax rates and revenues hve increased every time. Unfortunately, spending has increased faster.
Frosty, Cold Miser, the California Raisins, a T-Rex announcer and Gumby.
The pressure to vote the party line while both parties nominate empty suits and talking turds may lead to cognitive dissonance. Is this the best we can do as a nation? Real thinkers, not copy and paste pundits, may try to avoid labels of con and lib because they don't want to be associated with either party.

Giving freebies to illegals while veterans are living on our streets is intentional. I don't want to pay a dime for illegals.Welfare recipients rarely vote. The War on Poverty was misguided but well intended.
Show your work. I hear this but I've never seen a sliver of evidence supporting it.Completely not true. It's a spending problem. Five times we've cut tax rates and revenues hve increased every time. Unfortunately, spending has increased faster.
There is plenty of money in the United States. All we need is to direct the government to take the money from those who have it. That is what most of the voters want.Completely not true. It's a spending problem. Five times we've cut tax rates and revenues hve increased every time. Unfortunately, spending has increased faster.
Revenues doubled over a ten-year span, but for every new $1.00 of revenue, Congress (which was mostly under Democrat control) spent $1.73. IOW, the tax cuts grew the economy (as they had for Coolidge and JFK and would for Bush and Trump) but the Big Government politicians increased spending even faster than the revenue increases.Then why did the national debt triple under Reagan?
That's a good way to reduce the amount of money in the country. They'll move it somewhere where we can't tax it, stop producing as much, reduce wealth-generating activities. When you tax something, you get less of it. Tax wealthe creation and you'll get less wealth creation, which will reduce the standard of living for all of us.There is plenty of money in the United States. All we need is to direct the government to take the money from those who have it.
Of course you haven't. Your cult doesn't allow you to.Show your work. I hear this but I've never seen a sliver of evidence supporting it.
Your cult